Sliding Mode Boundary Control of an Euler–Bernoulli Beam Subject to Disturbances

In this paper, a control technique is presented for an undamped, pinned–pinned Euler–Bernoulli beam with control inputs and bounded disturbances on one boundary. The control strategy drives the system to its origin at an arbitrary exponential rate in the presence of the disturbances. This is achieved in two main steps. First, a backstepping transformation is used to convert the marginally stable Euler–Bernoulli beam system to a new form that has an exponentially stable homogeneous form. Control inputs are needed to fully convert the system to this form; however, since they are distorted by unknown bounded disturbances, the next step implements a sliding mode controller to account for them. The proposed sliding manifolds require a combination of classical and “second order” techniques in order to avoid discontinuous chattering on the physical system. Therefore, the continuous sliding mode controllers developed return the beam to its origin at an arbitrary exponential rate, and do so in the presence of unknown bounded disturbances on the boundary. The main contributions of this paper with respect to previous backstepping designs for the Euler–Bernoulli beam are that all three of the following goals are accomplished together: (i) steady-state position is the origin, (ii) decay rate has no theoretical restrictions, and (iii) is robust to bounded disturbances.

[1]  Weijiu Liu,et al.  Elementary Feedback Stabilization of the Linear Reaction-Convection-Diffusion Equation and the Wave Equation , 2009 .

[2]  Emilia Fridman Observers and initial state recovering for a class of hyperbolic systems via Lyapunov method , 2013, Autom..

[3]  M. Krstić,et al.  Backstepping Boundary Controllers and Observers for the Slender Timoshenko Beam: Part I - Design , 2006, 2006 American Control Conference.

[4]  Amr M. Baz,et al.  Boundary Control of Beams Using Active Constrained Layer Damping , 1997 .

[5]  Wu-Chung Su,et al.  Recent Trends in Stabilization and Control of Distributed Parameter Dynamic Systems , 2014 .

[6]  Garrett M. Clayton,et al.  Boundary control of harmonic disturbances on flexible cantilever beams using piezoelectric patch actuators , 2016 .

[7]  Xuefang Li,et al.  Adaptive Boundary Iterative Learning Control for an Euler–Bernoulli Beam System With Input Constraint , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems.

[8]  Ole Christensen,et al.  Functions, Spaces, and Expansions , 2010 .

[9]  Laura Levaggi Infinite dimensional systems' sliding motions , 2001, 2001 European Control Conference (ECC).

[10]  Wu-Chung Su,et al.  Sliding mode boundary control of a parabolic PDE system with parameter variations and boundary uncertainties , 2011, Autom..

[11]  D. Russell On the positive square root of the fourth derivative operator , 1988 .

[12]  Irena Lasiecka,et al.  Exact controllability of the Euler-Bernoulli equation with boundary controls for displacement and moment , 1990 .

[13]  M. Krstić Boundary Control of PDEs: A Course on Backstepping Designs , 2008 .

[14]  S. Adali,et al.  Maximum Principle for Optimal Boundary Control of Vibrating Structures with Applications to Beams , 1998 .

[15]  Yuri V. Orlov,et al.  Discontinuous unit feedback control of uncertain infinite-dimensional systems , 2000, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control..

[16]  Steven G. Krantz,et al.  The Euler-Bernoulli beam equation with boundary energy dissipation , 1988 .

[17]  Omer Morgiil Dynamic Boundary Control of a Euler-Bernoulli Beam , 1992 .

[18]  J. C. Bruch,et al.  Vibration damping in beams via piezo actuation using optimal boundary control , 2000 .

[19]  Emilia Fridman,et al.  Sliding mode control of Schrödinger equation-ODE in the presence of unmatched disturbances , 2016, Syst. Control. Lett..

[20]  Feng-Fei Jin,et al.  The active disturbance rejection and sliding mode control approach to the stabilization of the Euler-Bernoulli beam equation with boundary input disturbance , 2013, Autom..

[21]  Liviu Librescu,et al.  Bending Vibration Control of Cantilevers via Boundary Moment and Combined Feedback Control Laws , 1998 .

[22]  Shuzhi Sam Ge,et al.  Vibration Control of a Flexible Beam With Output Constraint , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics.

[23]  Miroslav Krstic,et al.  Arbitrary Decay Rate for Euler-Bernoulli Beam by Backstepping Boundary Feedback , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.

[24]  Shuzhi Sam Ge,et al.  Dynamic modeling and vibration control of a flexible satellite , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems.

[25]  D. Karagiannis,et al.  Sliding mode boundary control for vibration suppression in a pinned-pinned Euler–Bernoulli beam with disturbances , 2018 .

[26]  Feng-Fei Jin,et al.  Backstepping approach to the arbitrary decay rate for Euler–Bernoulli beam under boundary feedback , 2010, Int. J. Control.

[27]  T. K. Caughey,et al.  On the stability problem caused by finite actuator dynamics in the collocated control of large space structures , 1985 .

[28]  Bao-Zhu Guo,et al.  Lyapunov approach to output feedback stabilization for the Euler-Bernoulli beam equation with boundary input disturbance , 2015, Autom..

[29]  Shawn E. Burke,et al.  Distributed actuator control design for flexible beams , 1988, Autom..

[30]  Miroslav Krstic,et al.  Motion Planning and Tracking for Tip Displacement and Deflection Angle for Flexible Beams , 2009 .

[31]  M. Balas Active control of flexible systems , 1978 .

[32]  Verica Radisavljevic-Gajic,et al.  Sliding mode boundary control for an Euler-Bernoulli beam with boundary disturbances and parameter variations , 2014, 2014 American Control Conference.

[33]  Christopher Edwards,et al.  Sliding Mode Control and Observation , 2013 .

[34]  Miroslav Krstic,et al.  Boundary controllers and observers for Schrödinger equation , 2007, 2007 46th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control.