Communicating an arts foundation’s values: sights, sounds and social media

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to test and refine the long-established signal transmission model of the communication process by examining the ways in which a newly formed nonprofit arts foundation communicated its professed values to its stakeholders. Design/methodology/approach The study uses a mixed method case study approach. Interviews with key informants and observations of the foundation’s webpages enabled the identification of the professed values of the arts foundation. Next, a questionnaire survey established whether these values had been successfully decoded by stakeholders and identified the channels via which the values-related signals had been received. Findings The transmission model was found to be relevant as a model. However, to improve its fit within a nonprofit arts context, a modification to the model is suggested which highlights the importance of multi-sensory channels, the importance of context and the increasingly important role of the stakeholder. Research limitations/implications This study is a small-scale case study, although its mixed methods help to ensure validity. Practical implications The findings will help nonprofit arts organisations to decide how to best communicate their values to their stakeholders. Social implications The improved communications model will contribute to the enabling of organisations to uphold and transmit their values and thus improve society’s overall quality of life. Originality/value Literature which provides in-depth examination of the communication of values within a nonprofit arts context via a range of channels, including traditional, online and multi-sensory, is sparse. The opportunity to study a newly formed nonprofit arts organisation is also rare. The results of this study provide valuable evidence that even in today’s social media-rich world, people, sounds, sights and material objects in physical space still have a vital role to play in the communication of values.

[1]  S. Hudson,et al.  The effects of social media on emotions, brand relationship quality, and word of mouth: An empirical study of music festival attendees , 2015 .

[2]  Milena Micevski,et al.  An evaluation of nonprofit brand image: towards a better conceptualization and measurement , 2015 .

[3]  A. Hede,et al.  Marketing communications for special events: Analysing managerial practice, consumer perceptions and preferences , 2011 .

[4]  Eric W. K. Tsang.  Generalizing from Research Findings: The Merits of Case Studies , 2014 .

[5]  Terry O'Sullivan,et al.  Sounding boards: performing arts organizations and the Internet forum , 2007 .

[6]  J. Pedersen,et al.  Negotiating Values in the Creative Industries: Fairs, Festivals And Competitive Events , 2012 .

[7]  Brands in the arts and culture sector , 2014 .

[8]  Werner J. Severin,et al.  Communication Theories: Origins, Methods and Uses in the Mass Media , 1991 .

[9]  S. Pervan,et al.  Marketing orientation and arts organisations: the case for business sponsorship , 2009 .

[10]  Ruth Rentschler,et al.  Exhibitions as sub-brands: an exploratory study , 2014 .

[11]  Karen Smith.  THE INFORMATION MIX FOR EVENTS: A COMPARISON OF MULTIPLE CHANNELS USED BY EVENT ORGANISERS AND VISITORS , 2008 .

[12]  H. Stride.  An investigation into the values dimensions of branding: implications for the charity sector , 2006 .

[13]  Gregory D. Saxton,et al.  Information, Community, and Action: How Nonprofit Organizations Use Social Media , 2011, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[14]  Ruth Finnegan,et al.  Communicating: The Multiple Modes of Human Interconnection , 2002 .

[15]  A. Jyrämä,et al.  Arts Organizations and Branding: Creating a New Joint Brand for Three Arts Organizations , 2015 .

[16]  Simon Hudson,et al.  Engaging with consumers using social media: a case study of music festivals , 2013 .

[17]  N. Madichie.  Event Studies: Theory, Research and Policy for Planned Events , 2009 .

[18]  Richard D. Waters,et al.  Tweet, tweet, tweet: A content analysis of nonprofit organizations Twitter updates , 2011 .

[19]  Kyle M. Woosnam,et al.  The Role of Personal Values in Determining Tourist Motivations: An Application to the Winnipeg Fringe Theatre Festival, a Cultural Special Event , 2009 .

[20]  Jean Hartley,et al.  Case study research , 2004 .

[21]  D. O’reilly.  Branding the Arts and Entertainment , 2011 .

[22]  Leonard H. Hoyle.  Event Marketing: How to Successfully Promote Events, Festivals, Conventions, and Expositions , 2002 .

[23]  Charles Bladen,et al.  Events Management: An Introduction , 2012 .

[24]  J. Kennell.  Eventful cities: cultural management and urban revitalisation , 2012 .

[25]  Daniel M. Cable,et al.  Linking Organizational Values to Relationships with External Constituents: A Study of Nonprofit Professional Theatres , 2000 .

[26]  Stephen Brown.  Brands on a wet, black bough: marketing the masterworks of modernism. , 2015 .

[27]  R. Finkel.  "Dancing around the ring of fire": Social capital, tourism resistance, and gender dichotomies at up Helly Aa in Lerwick, Shetland. , 2010 .

[28]  Una McMahon-Beattie,et al.  Visitor Management for Festivals and Events , 2004 .

[29]  Maree Thyne,et al.  The importance of values research for nonprofit organisations: the motivation‐based values of museum visitors , 2001 .

[30]  Gregory D. Saxton,et al.  Tweeting Social Change , 2014 .

[31]  Linda Wilks.  The special challenges of marketing the arts festival , 2013 .

[32]  S. Hall.  The 'Structured Communication' of Events , 1973 .

[33]  E. Sharpe.  Festivals and Social Change: Intersections of Pleasure and Politics at a Community Music Festival , 2008 .

[34]  M. Rokeach,et al.  THE ROLE OF VALUES IN PUBLIC OPINION RESEARCH , 1968 .

[35]  Carlos Rey,et al.  Balanced Organizational Values: From Theory to Practice , 2015 .