A Low-Cost System for Seismocardiography-Based Cardiac Triggering: A Practical Solution for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Imaging at 3 Tesla

This study describes a pilot clinical validation of a new low-cost system for the continuous monitoring of the human body’s cardiorespiratory activities within the magnetic resonance examination area. This study primarily focuses on monitoring cardiac activity and the related cardiac triggering. The patented system tested by the authors is based on seismocardiography (SCG). The study was conducted on 18 subjects on a Siemens Prisma 3T MR scanner. Standard anatomical and diffusion sequences were used to test cardiac activity monitoring. A wide range of commonly used diagnostic sequences were used to test imaging of the heart by means of cardiac triggering. System functionality was verified against a commercially available electrocardiography (ECG) system. Monitoring of cardiac activity (detection of the R-R interval in ECG and the AO-AO interval in SCG) was objectively evaluated by determining the overall probability of correct detection (ACC), sensitivity (SE), positive predictive value (PPV), and harmonic mean between SE and PPV, i.e. F1. Imaging quality control using Cardiac Triggering was performed by subjective evaluation of images by the physicians. The study conducted clearly confirmed the functionality of the system in terms of continuous cardiac activity monitoring. In all 18 subjects, a mean PPV > 99% was achieved; F1 > 99%; SE > 99%; ACC > 98%; $1.96\sigma $ < 3.5 bpm. Also, Cardiac Triggering functionality was confirmed by the physicians on the basis of analyzing cardiac images using the T1/T2 balanced echo sequences and the T1 flash sequence measured natively.

[1]  Kouhyar Tavakolian,et al.  Seismocardiography: Past, present and future , 2013, 2013 35th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC).

[2]  Walter Heindel,et al.  Hazardous situation in the MR bore: induction in ECG leads causes fire , 2003, European Radiology.

[3]  Harald Becher,et al.  Analysis of regional left ventricular function by cineventriculography, cardiac magnetic resonance imaging, and unenhanced and contrast-enhanced echocardiography: a multicenter comparison of methods. , 2006, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[4]  A. Czylwik,et al.  Cardiac Imaging with a Phonocardiogram Trigger Device , 2010 .

[5]  Andrew C Larson,et al.  Self‐gated cardiac cine MRI , 2004, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[6]  Mark E Ladd,et al.  Initial evaluation of prospective cardiac triggering using photoplethysmography signals recorded with a video camera compared to pulse oximetry and electrocardiography at 7T MRI , 2016, Biomedical engineering online.

[7]  Łukasz Dziuda,et al.  Fiber-optic sensors for monitoring patient physiological parameters: a review of applicable technologies and relevance to use during magnetic resonance imaging procedures , 2015, Journal of biomedical optics.

[8]  Alayar Kangarlu,et al.  Effect of static magnetic field exposure of up to 8 Tesla on sequential human vital sign measurements , 2003, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[9]  Jan Nedoma,et al.  Speech Signal Processing using Microphones NI 9234 and LabVIEW , 2018, ICCMS.

[10]  Thoralf Niendorf,et al.  Electrocardiogram in an MRI Environment: Clinical Needs, Practical Considerations, Safety Implications, Technical Solutions and Future Directions , 2012 .

[11]  Krishna S. Nayak,et al.  Handbook of cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging , 2006 .

[12]  C H Lorenz,et al.  Novel real‐time R‐wave detection algorithm based on the vectorcardiogram for accurate gated magnetic resonance acquisitions , 1999, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[13]  Andrew C Larson,et al.  Preliminary investigation of respiratory self‐gating for free‐breathing segmented cine MRI , 2005, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[14]  Matthias Stuber,et al.  Right coronary MR angiography at 7 T: a direct quantitative and qualitative comparison with 3 T in young healthy volunteers. , 2010, Radiology.

[15]  Wei Liu,et al.  Ultrasound-Triggered Phase Transition Sensitive Magnetic Fluorescent Nanodroplets as a Multimodal Imaging Contrast Agent in Rat and Mouse Model , 2013, PloS one.

[16]  Christian Peters,et al.  Prediction of electrocardiography features points using seismocardiography data: a machine learning approach , 2018, UbiComp.

[17]  M. Fajkus,et al.  A comparison of probes based on Bragg grating sensor and microphones for heart sounds measurement , 2018, Security + Defence.

[18]  Fabian Kording,et al.  Doppler ultrasound compared with electrocardiogram and pulse oximetry cardiac triggering: A pilot study , 2015, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[19]  Julia M. Huntenburg,et al.  A mind-brain-body dataset of MRI, EEG, cognition, emotion, and peripheral physiology in young and old adults , 2019, Scientific Data.

[20]  Yu Ding,et al.  Magnetic field threshold for accurate electrocardiography in the MRI environment , 2010, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[21]  Jan Nedoma,et al.  Analysis of non-invasive FBG sensor for monitoring patient vital signs during MRI , 2017, Security + Defence.

[22]  Maxim Zaitsev,et al.  Hybrid ultrasound MRI for improved cardiac imaging and real‐time respiration control , 2010, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[23]  M. Gutberlet,et al.  Influence of high magnetic field strengths and parallel acquisition strategies on image quality in cardiac 2D CINE magnetic resonance imaging: comparison of 1.5 T vs. 3.0 T , 2005, European Radiology.

[24]  X Hu,et al.  Retrospective estimation and correction of physiological fluctuation in functional MRI , 1995, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[25]  S. Schoenberg,et al.  Cardiac magnetic resonance perfusion imaging for the functional assessment of coronary artery disease: a comparison with coronary angiography and fractional flow reserve. , 2006, European heart journal.

[26]  D. Altman,et al.  Measuring agreement in method comparison studies , 1999, Statistical methods in medical research.

[27]  Steven L Wolf,et al.  Targeted Neuromodulation of Abnormal Interhemispheric Connectivity to Promote Neural Plasticity and Recovery of Arm Function after Stroke: A Randomized Crossover Clinical Trial Study Protocol , 2018, Neural plasticity.

[28]  Jan Nedoma,et al.  Comparison of the LMS, NLMS, RLS, and QR-RLS algorithms for vehicle noise suppression , 2018 .

[29]  Marcus Schreckenberg,et al.  High-resolution transthoracic real-time three-dimensional echocardiography: quantitation of cardiac volumes and function using semi-automatic border detection and comparison with cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. , 2004, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[30]  Alan C. Bovik,et al.  No-Reference Image Quality Assessment in the Spatial Domain , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[31]  Paul M. Danehy,et al.  Femtosecond Laser Tagging Characterization of a Sweeping Jet Actuator Operating in the Compressible Regime , 2016 .

[32]  C H Lorenz,et al.  Performance of QRS detection for cardiac magnetic resonance imaging with a novel vectorcardiographic triggering method , 2000, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[33]  Richard Hansen,et al.  National Instruments LabVIEW: A Programming Environment for Laboratory Automation and Measurement , 2007 .

[34]  Radek Martinek,et al.  A novel LabVIEW-based multi-channel non-invasive abdominal maternal-fetal electrocardiogram signal generator , 2016, Physiological measurement.

[35]  Omer T. Inan,et al.  Relationship between cardiac quiescent periods derived from seismocardiography and echocardiography , 2015, 2015 37th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC).

[36]  Stefan Maderwald,et al.  Cardiac MRI: evaluation of phonocardiogram-gated cine imaging for the assessment of global und regional left ventricular function in clinical routine , 2012, European Radiology.

[37]  R. Sablong,et al.  Optical cardiac and respiratory device for synchronized MRI on small animal , 2007, 2007 29th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[38]  Fabian Kording,et al.  Doppler Ultrasound Triggering for Cardiovascular MRI at 3T in a Healthy Volunteer Study , 2016, Magnetic resonance in medical sciences : MRMS : an official journal of Japan Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine.

[39]  Kwang-Suk Jung,et al.  Atomic force microscopy using optical pickup head to measure cantilever displacement , 2011 .

[40]  Carson A. Wick,et al.  An Adaptive Seismocardiography (SCG)-ECG Multimodal Framework for Cardiac Gating Using Artificial Neural Networks , 2018, IEEE Journal of Translational Engineering in Health and Medicine.

[41]  Quynh Nhu Nguyen,et al.  Cables and electrodes can burn patients during MRI. , 2006, Nursing.

[42]  Zhi-Pei Liang,et al.  Real-time cardiac MRI without triggering, gating, or breath holding , 2008, 2008 30th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[43]  Thoralf Niendorf,et al.  Toward cardiovascular MRI at 7 T: clinical needs, technical solutions and research promises , 2010, European Radiology.

[44]  Seok-Bum Ko,et al.  A heart rate sensor based on seismocardiography for vital sign monitoring systems , 2011, 2011 24th Canadian Conference on Electrical and Computer Engineering(CCECE).

[45]  Sandeep N. Gupta,et al.  Evaluation of diffuse myocardial fibrosis in heart failure with cardiac magnetic resonance contrast-enhanced T1 mapping. , 2008, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[46]  Tajudeen Abiodun Ishola,et al.  A NOVEL VARIABLE RATE PNEUMATIC FERTILIZER APPLICATOR , 2014 .

[47]  David A. Bluemke,et al.  Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging and its electrocardiographs (ECG): tips and tricks , 2012, The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging.

[48]  Leon Axel,et al.  Clinical Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging Techniques , 2019, Contemporary Cardiology.

[49]  Andrew C Larson,et al.  Comparison of self‐gated cine MRI retrospective cardiac synchronization algorithms , 2008, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[50]  P. Boesiger,et al.  Good practices in EEG-MRI: The utility of retrospective synchronization and PCA for the removal of MRI gradient artefacts , 2010, NeuroImage.

[51]  Ari Paasio,et al.  Seismocardiography: Toward heart rate variability (HRV) estimation , 2015, 2015 IEEE International Symposium on Medical Measurements and Applications (MeMeA) Proceedings.

[52]  Thoralf Niendorf,et al.  The MR-stethoscope: safe cardiac gating free of interference with electro-magnetic fields at 1.5 T, 3.0 T and 7.0 T , 2009 .

[53]  Christoph Butenweg,et al.  Comparison of left ventricular function assessment using phonocardiogram- and electrocardiogram-triggered 2D SSFP CINE MR imaging at 1.5 T and 3.0 T , 2010, European Radiology.

[54]  Markus Barth,et al.  ECG Triggering in Ultra-High Field Cardiovascular MRI , 2016, Tomography.

[55]  Nicolai Spicher Cardiac activity measurement from video signals of the human skin in ultrahigh-field magnetic resonance imaging , 2016, GI-Jahrestagung.

[56]  Jan Nedoma,et al.  Validation of a Novel Fiber-Optic Sensor System for Monitoring Cardiorespiratory Activities During MRI Examinations , 2017 .

[57]  J M Rubin,et al.  Doppler US gating of cardiac MR imaging. , 2000, Academic radiology.

[58]  Thoralf Niendorf,et al.  Acoustic cardiac triggering: a practical solution for synchronization and gating of cardiovascular magnetic resonance at 7 Tesla , 2010, Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance.

[59]  D. Peters,et al.  Respiratory bellows revisited for motion compensation: Preliminary experience for cardiovascular MR , 2011, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[60]  Michael Erb,et al.  Feasibility of real-time surface electromyographytriggered diffusion-weighted imaging for prospective imaging of spontaneous unintentional focal muscular motion in human calf musculature , 2017 .

[61]  D Stucht,et al.  Limitations of VCG based gating methods in ultra high field cardiac MRI , 2013, Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance.

[62]  Klaas Nicolay,et al.  Comparison between prospective and retrospective triggering for mouse cardiac MRI , 2007, NMR in biomedicine.

[63]  Jan Nedoma,et al.  Comparative Effectiveness of ICA and PCA in Extraction of Fetal ECG From Abdominal Signals: Toward Non-invasive Fetal Monitoring , 2018, Front. Physiol..

[64]  Pierre Croisille,et al.  Cardiac and respiratory double self‐gated cine MRI in the mouse at 7 T , 2006, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[65]  Kouhyar Tavakolian,et al.  Ballistocardiography and Seismocardiography: A Review of Recent Advances , 2015, IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics.

[66]  G J Metzger,et al.  Initial results of cardiac imaging at 7 tesla , 2009, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[67]  Jan Nedoma,et al.  A Non-Invasive Multichannel Hybrid Fiber-Optic Sensor System for Vital Sign Monitoring , 2017, Sensors.

[68]  Anja C S Brau,et al.  Fiber‐optic stethoscope: A cardiac monitoring and gating system for magnetic resonance microscopy , 2002, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[69]  V. Robin,et al.  Alterations in human ECG due to the MagnetoHydroDynamic effect: A method for accurate R peak detection in the presence of high MHD artifacts , 2007, 2007 29th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[70]  Richard M. Millis Advances in Electrocardiograms - Methods and Analysis , 2012 .

[71]  Peter Boesiger,et al.  Feasibility of Cardiac Gating Free of Interference With Electro-Magnetic Fields at 1.5 Tesla, 3.0 Tesla and 7.0 Tesla Using an MR-Stethoscope , 2009, Investigative radiology.

[72]  Thoralf Niendorf,et al.  Cardiac chamber quantification using magnetic resonance imaging at 7 Tesla—a pilot study , 2010, European Radiology.

[73]  Claudia Metzler-Baddeley,et al.  E06 Using 3T MRI to explore myelin break-down in pre-symptomatic huntington’s disease , 2018, Imaging.