Research on the social acceptance of renewable energy technologies: Past, present and future

Abstract Social sciences have been very prolific in the last decades in publishing research that attempts to better understand the social acceptance of renewable energy technologies and associated infrastructures (RET) – such as high voltage power lines – and processes – such as communities’ participation in related decision-making processes. This Perspective proposes that this might be a good point in time, roughly 30 years after social sciences begun looking at the social side of RET, to offer a (over)view on that research, if and how it has changed over time and where it leaves us currently or, in other words, which directions we should follow in the future. I first provide an overview of research on the social acceptance of RET, suggesting that it can be roughly organized around three waves - normative, criticism and critical -; for then identifying and discussing some avenues for future research.

[1]  Martin J. Pasqualetti,et al.  Morality, Space, and the Power of Wind‐Energy Landscapes , 2000 .

[2]  R. Phadke.  Resisting and Reconciling Big Wind: Middle Landscape Politics in the New American West , 2011 .

[3]  S. Batel.  A critical discussion of research on the social acceptance of renewable energy generation and associated infrastructures and an agenda for the future , 2017 .

[4]  Petra Schweizer-Ries,et al.  Public acceptance of renewable energies: Results from case studies in Germany , 2008 .

[5]  P. Devine‐Wright.  Public engagement with large‐scale renewable energy technologies: breaking the cycle of NIMBYism , 2011 .

[6]  Claire Haggett,et al.  Uncommon ground: The role of different place attachments in explaining community renewable energy projects , 2017 .

[7]  Mike Gismondi.  Historicizing transitions: The value of historical theory to energy transition research , 2018 .

[8]  D. Uzzell,et al.  Environmental Policies and The Reproduction of Business as Usual: How Does It Work? , 2019 .

[9]  W. Freudenburg,et al.  NIMBYs and LULUs: Stalking the Syndromes , 1992 .

[10]  N. Rose.  Governing the Soul: The Shaping of the Private Self , 1991 .

[11]  N. Freudenberg,et al.  Not in our backyards: The grassroots environmental movement , 1991 .

[12]  D. Bell,et al.  The ‘Social Gap’ in Wind Farm Siting Decisions: Explanations and Policy Responses , 2005 .

[13]  Claire Haggett,et al.  Understanding public responses to offshore wind power , 2011 .

[14]  C. Gross,et al.  Community perspectives of wind energy in Australia: The application of a justice and community fairness framework to increase social acceptance , 2007 .

[15]  Rachel Hirsch,et al.  A case-control study of support/opposition to wind turbines: Perceptions of health risk, economic benefits, and community conflict , 2013 .

[16]  Kate Burningham,et al.  Using the Language of NIMBY: A topic for research, not an activity for researchers , 2000 .

[17]  Patrick Devine-Wright,et al.  Beyond NIMBYism: towards an integrated framework for understanding public perceptions of wind energy , 2005 .

[18]  W. Kempton,et al.  Public opinion about large offshore wind power: Underlying factors , 2007 .

[19]  Cymene Howe.  Anthropocenic Ecoauthority: The Winds of Oaxaca , 2014 .

[20]  L. Gailing,et al.  Political landscapes between manifestations and democracy, identities and power , 2017 .

[21]  Mark Scott,et al.  Opportunity or Threat: Dissecting Tensions in a Post‐Carbon Rural Transition , 2017 .

[22]  G. Walker,et al.  Energy and Society , 2018 .

[23]  Maarten Wolsink,et al.  Wind power implementation: The nature of public attitudes: Equity and fairness instead of ‘backyard motives’ , 2007 .

[24]  N. Marres.  Material Participation: Technology, the Environment and Everyday Publics , 2012 .

[25]  Carly McLachlan,et al.  'You don't do a chemistry experiment in your best china': Symbolic interpretations of place and technology in a wave energy case , 2009 .

[26]  B. Wiersma,et al.  Community benefits, framing and the social acceptance of offshore wind farms: An experimental study in England , 2014 .

[27]  Patrick Devine-Wright,et al.  Towards a better understanding of people’s responses to renewable energy technologies: Insights from Social Representations Theory , 2015, Public understanding of science.

[28]  K. Ingold,et al.  Bringing the policy making perspective in: a political science approach to social acceptance , 2017 .

[29]  M. Slattery,et al.  Public attitudes of wind energy in Texas: Local communities in close proximity to wind farms and their effect on decision-making , 2010 .

[30]  P. Devine‐Wright,et al.  Energy Colonialism and the Role of the Global in Local Responses to New Energy Infrastructures in the UK: A Critical and Exploratory Empirical Analysis , 2017 .

[31]  Gordon Walker,et al.  Good Neighbours, Public Relations and Bribes: The Politics and Perceptions of Community Benefit Provision in Renewable Energy Development in the UK , 2010 .

[32]  Sara Penrhyn Jones,et al.  Tilting at Windmills in a changing climate: a performative walking practice and dance-documentary film as an embodied mode of engagement and persuasion , 2012 .

[33]  P. Devine‐Wright.  Reconsidering public attitudes and public acceptance of renewable energy technologies: a critical review , 2007 .

[34]  Richard Alan Hindmarsh,et al.  Deliberative Speak at the Turbine Face: Community Engagement, Wind Farms, and Renewable Energy Transitions, in Australia , 2008 .

[35]  Maarten Wolsink,et al.  Invalid theory impedes our understanding: A critique on the persistence of the language of NIMBY , 2006 .

[36]  E. Swyngedouw.  Apocalypse Forever? , 2010 .

[37]  J. Richard Eiser,et al.  Identifying predictors of attitudes towards local onshore wind development with reference to an English case study , 2009 .

[38]  Mhairi Aitken,et al.  Why we still don't understand the social aspects of wind power: A critique of key assumptions within the literature , 2010 .

[39]  Geraint Ellis,et al.  Cool Rationalities and Hot Air: A Rhetorical Approach to Understanding Debates on Renewable Energy , 2008, Global Environmental Politics.

[40]  C. Kropp,et al.  Controversies around energy landscapes in third modernity , 2018 .

[41]  Yoav Rinon.  Plato's Pharmacy , 1992 .

[42]  Stephen D. Hill,et al.  Lessons learned from Ontario wind energy disputes , 2016, Nature Energy.

[43]  David Rudolph,et al.  Making Space for Wind Farms: Practices of Territorial Stigmatisation in Rural Denmark , 2018, Antipode.

[44]  K. Bickerstaff.  Risk perception research: socio-cultural perspectives on the public experience of air pollution. , 2004, Environment international.

[45]  Matthew Adams.  Approaching Nature, ‘Sustainability’ and Ecological Crises from a Critical Social Psychological Perspective , 2014 .

[46]  P. Devine‐Wright,et al.  Community renewable energy: What should it mean , 2008 .

[47]  P. Devine‐Wright.  Rethinking NIMBYism: The role of place attachment and place identity in explaining place‐protective action , 2009 .

[48]  Thomas Bauwens,et al.  What drives the development of community energy in Europe? The case of wind power cooperatives , 2016 .

[49]  E. Creamer,et al.  Community renewable energy: What does it do? Walker and Devine-Wright (2008) ten years on , 2019, Energy Research & Social Science.

[50]  Kate Burningham,et al.  An Array of Deficits: Unpacking NIMBY Discourses in Wind Energy Developers' Conceptualizations of Their Local Opponents , 2015 .

[51]  K. Borch,et al.  Mapping wind-power controversies on social media: Facebook as a powerful mobilizer of local resistance , 2020 .

[52]  Gordon Walker,et al.  Renewable energy and the public , 1995 .

[53]  Gordon Walker,et al.  Beyond Distribution and Proximity: Exploring the Multiple Spatialities of Environmental Justice , 2009 .

[54]  L. Steg,et al.  Psychological factors influencing sustainable energy technology acceptance: A review-based comprehensive framework , 2012 .

[55]  Johannes Pohl,et al.  Attitudes of U.S. Wind Turbine Neighbors: Analysis of a Nationwide Survey , 2019, Energy Policy.

[56]  M. Wolsink.  Social acceptance revisited: gaps, questionable trends, and an auspicious perspective , 2018, Energy Research & Social Science.

[57]  P. Devine‐Wright,et al.  Social acceptance of low carbon energy and associated infrastructures: A critical discussion , 2013 .

[58]  D. Bell,et al.  Re-visiting the ‘social gap’: public opinion and relations of power in the local politics of wind energy , 2013 .

[59]  G. Ellis,et al.  Many ways to say ‘no’, different ways to say ‘yes’: Applying Q-Methodology to understand public acceptance of wind farm proposals , 2007 .

[60]  Maarten Wolsink,et al.  Planning of renewables schemes: Deliberative and fair decision-making on landscape issues instead of reproachful accusations of non-cooperation , 2007 .

[61]  Energy Colonialism Powers the Ongoing Unnatural Disaster in Puerto Rico , 2018 .

[62]  Claire Haggett,et al.  Tilting at Windmills?: Using Discourse Analysis to Understand the Attitude-Behaviour Gap in Renewable Energy Conflicts , 2011 .

[63]  B. Sovacool,et al.  A conceptual framework for understanding the social acceptance of energy infrastructure: Insights from energy storage , 2017 .

[64]  Maarten Wolsink,et al.  Wind power deployment outcomes: How can we account for the differences? , 2008 .

[65]  Elizabeth L. Malone,et al.  Stories about ourselves: How national narratives influence the diffusion of large-scale energy technologies , 2017 .

[66]  P. Devine‐Wright,et al.  Disruption to place attachment and the protection of restorative environments: A wind energy case study , 2010 .

[67]  B. Sovacool,et al.  Elite Power in Low-Carbon Transitions: A Critical and Interdisciplinary Review , 2019, Energy Research & Social Science.

[68]  David Uzzell,et al.  Transforming environmental psychology , 2009 .

[69]  Eefje Cuppen,et al.  The value of social conflicts. Critiquing invited participation in energy projects , 2018 .

[70]  R. McLeman,et al.  Attitudes towards new renewable energy technologies in the eastern Ontario highlands. , 2012 .

[71]  Michèle Knodt,et al.  Sustainable energy transformations in an age of populism, post-truth politics, and local resistance , 2018, Energy Research & Social Science.

[72]  Daniel Wuebben.  From wire evil to power line poetics: The ethics and aesthetics of renewable transmission , 2017 .

[73]  R. Stedman,et al.  Learning (or living) to love the landscapes of hydroelectricity in Canada: Eliciting local perspectives on the Mactaquac Dam via headpond boat tours , 2016 .

[74]  B. Lennon,et al.  Citizen or consumer? Reconsidering energy citizenship , 2020, Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning.

[75]  Maarten Wolsink,et al.  Wind power and the NIMBY-myth: institutional capacity and the limited significance of public support , 2000 .

[76]  Charles R. Warren,et al.  ‘Green On Green’: Public perceptions of wind power in Scotland and Ireland , 2005 .

[77]  D. Horst.  NIMBY or not? Exploring the relevance of location and the politics of voiced opinions in renewable energy siting controversies , 2007 .

[78]  Claire Haggett.  Over the Sea and Far Away? A Consideration of the Planning, Politics and Public Perception of Offshore Wind Farms , 2008 .

[79]  M. Lima,et al.  Predictors of Attitudes Towards the Construction of a Waste Incinerator: Two Case Studies1 , 2006 .

[80]  Christopher Rootes,et al.  Environmental movements, waste and waste infrastructure: an introduction , 2009 .

[81]  Rolf Wüstenhagen,et al.  Social acceptance of renewable energy innovation: An introduction to the concept , 2007 .

[82]  B. Sovacool.  What Are We Doing Here? Analyzing Fifteen Years of Energy Scholarship and Proposing a Social Science Research Agenda , 2014 .

[83]  Kate Burningham,et al.  Imagined publics and engagement around renewable energy technologies in the UK , 2012 .

[84]  P. Devine‐Wright,et al.  Developing a critical agenda to understand pro‐environmental actions: contributions from Social Representations and Social Practices Theories , 2016 .

[85]  R. Lake,et al.  VOLUNTEERS, NIMBYs, AND ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE: DILEMMAS OF DEMOCRATIC PRACTICE , 1996 .

[86]  Nick Eyre,et al.  Geographies of energy transition: Space, place and the low-carbon economy , 2013 .

[87]  Jennifer Baka.  Making space for energy: wasteland development, enclosures, and energy dispossessions , 2017 .

[88]  C. Mouffe.  Agonistics: Thinking the World Politically , 2013 .

[89]  Dan van der Horst,et al.  Exploring the landscape of wind farm developments; local area characteristics and planning process outcomes in rural England , 2010 .

[90]  Gillian Irene Bristow,et al.  Acceptance, acceptability and environmental justice: the role of community benefits in wind energy development , 2011 .

[91]  P. Devine‐Wright,et al.  Partnership or placation? The role of trust and justice in the shared ownership of renewable energy projects , 2016 .