An Exploration of Why People Participate in Second Life Social Support Groups

The present study investigates why people participate in Second Life social support groups. Twenty-three participants in Alcoholics Anonymous and Cancer Caregiver groups that meet in Second Life were interviewed and asked how satisfied they are with those meetings, what influences their satisfaction, what they find most helpful, what they like the least, the nature of their relationships in the group, and what surprised them the most. Their responses identify the text-based anonymity, nearly synchronous communication, visual representation of avatars, and use of time and virtual space as influences that stimulate hyperpersonal relationship development in their Second Life social support groups.

[1]  J. Norris,et al.  The Growth and Direction of Healthcare Support Groups in Virtual Worlds , 2009 .

[2]  Christopher E. Beaudoin.  Explaining the Relationship between Internet Use and Interpersonal Trust: Taking into Account Motivation and Information Overload , 2008, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[3]  Kevin B. Wright,et al.  Social support satisfaction, on‐line communication apprehension, and perceived life stress within computer‐mediated support groups , 2000 .

[4]  C. Wankel.  Higher Education in Virtual Worlds : Teaching and Learning in Second Life , 2010 .

[5]  C. Nass,et al.  When a Talking-Face Computer Agent Is Half-Human and Half-Humanoid: Human Identity and Consistency Preference. , 2007 .

[6]  Jan Colvin,et al.  Caregivers of Older Adults: Advantages and Disadvantages of Internet‐based Social Support* , 2004 .

[7]  Kristine L. Nowak,et al.  AA online: the enactment of supportive Computer Mediated Communication , 2005 .

[8]  Suzanne Pingree,et al.  Effects of Insightful Disclosure Within Computer Mediated Support Groups on Women With Breast Cancer , 2006, Health communication.

[9]  Carol Stringer Cawyer,et al.  Communicating social support: Identifying supportive episodes in an HIV/AIDS support group , 1995 .

[10]  J. Grube,et al.  Developing an optimal match within online communities: an exploration of CMC support communities and traditional support , 2001 .

[11]  Neil S. Coulson,et al.  Receiving Social Support Online: An Analysis of a Computer-Mediated Support Group for Individuals Living with Irritable Bowel Syndrome , 2005, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[12]  Christian Rauh,et al.  The Influence of the Avatar on Online Perceptions of Anthropomorphism, Androgyny, Credibility, Homophily, and Attraction , 2005, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[13]  J. Walther.  Computer-Mediated Communication , 1996 .

[14]  Qimei Chen,et al.  Internet Community Group Participation: Psychosocial Benefits for Women with Breast Cancer , 2005, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[15]  C. Latkin,et al.  Social Networks, Norms, and 12-Step Group Participation , 2008, The American journal of drug and alcohol abuse.

[16]  Kristen Campbell Eichhorn,et al.  Soliciting and Providing Social Support Over the Internet: An Investigation of Online Eating Disorder Support Groups , 2008, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[17]  Kevin B. Wright,et al.  On‐line support groups: An investigation of relationships among source credibility, dimensions of relational communication, and perceptions of emotional support , 2002 .

[18]  Mark W. Bell.  Toward a Definition of “Virtual Worlds” , 1970 .

[19]  A. Strauss,et al.  Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. , 1993 .

[20]  K. Miller,et al.  Providing Care for Elderly Parents: A Structurational Approach to Family Caregiver Identity , 2008 .

[21]  Panayiotis Zaphiris,et al.  The role of message-sequences in the sustainability of an online support community for older people , 2010, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[22]  S. Kleinman.  Social Identification in a Computer-Mediated Group for Women in Science and Engineering , 2000 .

[23]  Feng-Yang Kuo,et al.  An Exploratory Study of Trust Dynamics in Work-Oriented Virtual Teams , 2009, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[24]  K. Wright.  Computer‐mediated support groups: An examination of relationships among social support, perceived stress, and coping strategies , 1999 .

[25]  Vincent R. Waldron,et al.  Communication of social support in computer-mediated groups for people with disabilities. , 1999, Health communication.

[26]  J. Till,et al.  Evaluation of support groups for women with breast cancer: importance of the navigator role , 2003, Health and quality of life outcomes.

[27]  Tom Boellstorff.  Coming of Age in Second Life: An Anthropologist Explores the Virtually Human , 2008 .

[28]  Kevin B. Wright,et al.  Motives for communication within on‐line support groups and antecedents for interpersonal use , 2002 .

[29]  W. Diehl,et al.  Unintended Outcomes in Second Life: Intercultural Literacy and Cultural Identity in a Virtual World , 2008 .

[30]  Tara M. Emmers-Sommer,et al.  Predictors of Relationship Satisfaction in Online Romantic Relationships , 2006 .

[31]  Kevin B. Wright,et al.  Health-related Support Groups on the Internet: Linking Empirical Findings to Social Support and Computer-mediated Communication Theory , 2003, Journal of health psychology.

[32]  D. Nicholas,et al.  Evaluation of an Online Peer Support Network for Adolescents with Chronic Kidney Disease , 2009 .

[33]  Jennifer Martin.  Consuming Code: Use-Value, Exchange-Value, and the Role of Virtual Goods in Second Life , 2008 .

[34]  Rodney Harrison,et al.  Excavating Second Life , 2009 .

[35]  James D. Robinson,et al.  Impersonal, Interpersonal, and Hyperpersonal Social Support: Cancer and Older Adults , 2003, Health communication.

[36]  Hyun Jung Oh,et al.  The Effect of Computer-Mediated Social Support in Online Communities on Patient Empowerment and Doctor–Patient Communication , 2012, Health communication.

[37]  B. Glaser.  Basics of Grounded Theory Analysis: Emergence Vs. Forcing , 1992 .

[38]  L. B. Rosenfeld,et al.  A test of competing models of the influence of social support on school engagement in the presence of neighborhood danger , 2004 .

[39]  Christopher A. Paul.  Culture and Practice: What We Do, Not Just Where We Are , 2009 .

[40]  K. Wright.  Social support within an on-line cancer community: an assessment of emotional support, perceptions of advantages and disadvantages, and motives for using the community from a communication perspective , 2002 .

[41]  A. Strauss,et al.  The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research aldine de gruyter , 1968 .

[42]  Michael Grüninger,et al.  Introduction , 2002, CACM.

[43]  J. Sherblom.  The computer-mediated communication (CMC) classroom: a challenge of medium, presence, interaction, identity, and relationship , 2010 .

[44]  Jerry Suls,et al.  Hystersisters online: social support and social comparison among hysterectomy patients on the internet , 2006, Annals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine.

[45]  N. Petry,et al.  Changing network support for drinking: initial findings from the network support project. , 2007, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.

[46]  Martin Tanis,et al.  Health-Related On-Line Forums: What's the Big Attraction? , 2008, Journal of health communication.

[47]  Smiljana Antonijevic,et al.  Information, Communication & Society , 2008 .

[48]  Anol Bhattacherjee,et al.  Social Support : An Investigation of Network Information Technology Based on UTAUT , 2008 .

[49]  K B Wright,et al.  Shared ideology in Alcoholics Anonymous: a grounded theory approach. , 1997, Journal of health communication.