The challenge of human interdependence: Consequences for thinking about the day to day practice of management in organizations

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to locate the dominant discourse on organizations and their management in the history of Western thought. Such location highlights the fundamental, taken‐for‐granted assumptions underlying the dominant discourse. The purpose is also to identify an alternative way of thinking about organizations, which derives from different fundamental assumptions.Design/methodology/approach – The approach adopted in the paper is to review two fundamentally different approaches in Western thought to understanding the nature of the individual human agent, the organization and the relationship between them. One approach derives from the philosophy of Kant and the other from Hegel.Findings – The exploration of different ways of thinking in this paper leads to a major undermining of the dominant discourse and overturns the most widespread prescriptions for strategic management and the management of change.Originality/value – In doing so the paper has profound significance for the concept...

[1]  Meeta Dasgupta,et al.  Innovation in Organizations , 2009 .

[2]  Sang Joon Kim,et al.  A Mathematical Theory of Communication , 2006 .

[3]  R. Stacey Experiencing Emergence in Organizations : local interaction and the emergence of global pattern , 2005 .

[4]  Ralph Stacey,et al.  Complexity and the Experience of Leading Organizations , 2005 .

[5]  R. Stacey,et al.  Complexity and the Experience of Managing in Public Sector Organizations , 2005 .

[6]  Ralph Stacey,et al.  A Complexity Perspective on Researching Organizations : Taking Experience Seriously , 2005 .

[7]  Morris B. Holbrook,et al.  Complexity and Management: Fad or Radical Challenge to Systems Thinking? , 2002 .

[8]  Patricia Shaw,et al.  Complexity and Management: Fad or Radical Challenge to Systems Thinking? , 2002 .

[9]  Douglas Griffin,et al.  The Emergence of Leadership: Linking Self-Organization and Ethics , 2001 .

[10]  Ralph Stacey,et al.  Complex Responsive Processes in Organizations: Learning and Knowledge Creation , 2001 .

[11]  Philip J. Streatfield,et al.  The paradox of control in organizations , 2001 .

[12]  I. Prigogine,et al.  The end of certainty : time, chaos, and the new laws of nature , 1997 .

[13]  Brian C. Goodwin,et al.  How the Leopard Changed Its Spots , 1995 .

[14]  John Archibald Wheeler,et al.  At Home in the Universe , 1994 .

[15]  Norbert Elias,et al.  The Society of Individuals , 1993 .

[16]  M. J. Petry The Phenomenology of Spirit , 1978 .

[17]  J. Lopreato,et al.  General system theory : foundations, development, applications , 1970 .

[18]  Viktor Mikhaĭlovich Glushkov,et al.  An Introduction to Cybernetics , 1957, The Mathematical Gazette.

[19]  J. Lanzetta,et al.  Innovation in organizations , 1965 .

[20]  Kenneth L. Artis Design for a Brain , 1961 .

[21]  Robert Liebendorfer Mind, self and society , 1960 .

[22]  W. Ashby,et al.  An introduction to cybernetics. , 1956 .

[23]  F. H. Adler Cybernetics, or Control and Communication in the Animal and the Machine. , 1949 .

[24]  F. Stuart Chapin,et al.  What is Sociology , 1918 .