First update of the International Xenotransplantation Association consensus statement on conditions for undertaking clinical trials of porcine islet products in type 1 diabetes—Chapter 2a: source pigs—preventing xenozoonoses

Chapter 2 of the original consensus statement published in 2009 by IXA represents an excellent basis for the production of safe donor pigs and pig‐derived materials for porcine islet xenotransplantation. It was intended that the consensus statement was to be reviewed at interval to remain relevant. Indeed, many of the original salient points remain relevant today, especially when porcine islet xenotransplantation is performed in conjunction with immunosuppressants. However, progress in the field including demonstrated safe clinical porcine xenograft studies, increased understanding of risks including those posed by PERV, and advancement of diagnostic capabilities now allow for further consideration. Agents of known and unknown pathogenic significance continue to be identified and should be considered on a geographic, risk‐based, dynamic, and product‐specific basis, where appropriate using validated, advanced diagnostic techniques. PERV risk can be sufficiently reduced via multicomponent profiling including subtype expression levels in combination with infectivity assays. Barrier facilities built and operated against the AAALAC Ag Guide or suitable alternative criteria should be considered for source animal production as long as cGMPs and SOPs are followed. Bovine material‐free feed for source animals should be considered appropriate instead of mammalian free materials to sufficiently reduce TSE risks. Finally, the sponsor retention period for archival samples of donor materials was deemed sufficient until the death of the recipient if conclusively determined to be of unrelated and non‐infectious cause or for a reasonable period, that is, five to 10 yrs. In summary, the safe and economical production of suitable pigs and porcine islet xenograft materials, under appropriate guidance and regulatory control, is believed to be a viable means of addressing the unmet need for clinical islet replacement materials.

[1]  J. Denner,et al.  Microbiological safety of the first clinical pig islet xenotransplantation trial in New Zealand , 2014, Xenotransplantation.

[2]  Barry H. Smith,et al.  No Evidence of Viral Transmission following Long-Term Implantation of Agarose Encapsulated Porcine Islets in Diabetic Dogs , 2014, Journal of diabetes research.

[3]  P. Duncan,et al.  Systematic evaluation of in vitro and in vivo adventitious virus assays for the detection of viral contamination of cell banks and biological products. , 2014, Vaccine.

[4]  A. Varki,et al.  Long-Term IgG Response to Porcine Neu5Gc Antigens without Transmission of PERV in Burn Patients Treated with Porcine Skin Xenografts , 2013, The Journal of Immunology.

[5]  Christopher M. Hindson,et al.  Absolute quantification by droplet digital PCR versus analog real-time PCR , 2013, Nature Methods.

[6]  Y. Takeuchi,et al.  Role of DNA Methylation in Expression and Transmission of Porcine Endogenous Retroviruses , 2013, Journal of Virology.

[7]  S. Bornstein,et al.  Screening pigs for xenotransplantation: prevalence and expression of porcine endogenous retroviruses in Göttingen minipigs , 2013, Xenotransplantation.

[8]  Z. Duan,et al.  Detection of novel viruses in porcine fecal samples from China , 2013, Virology Journal.

[9]  A. Skalka,et al.  Retroviral DNA Methylation and Epigenetic Repression Are Mediated by the Antiviral Host Protein Daxx , 2012, Journal of Virology.

[10]  Z. Gu,et al.  Comparison of Droplet Digital PCR to Real-Time PCR for Quantitative Detection of Cytomegalovirus , 2012, Journal of Clinical Microbiology.

[11]  Udo Albus,et al.  Book Review: Guide for the Care and use of Laboratory Animals , 1998 .

[12]  J. Denner,et al.  Infection Barriers to Successful Xenotransplantation Focusing on Porcine Endogenous Retroviruses , 2012, Clinical Microbiology Reviews.

[13]  Y. Takeuchi,et al.  Xenotransplantation‐associated infectious risk: a WHO consultation , 2012, Xenotransplantation.

[14]  A. Potter,et al.  Detection and Control of Prion Diseases in Food Animals , 2012, ISRN veterinary science.

[15]  X. Meng,et al.  Emerging and re-emerging swine viruses. , 2012, Transboundary and emerging diseases.

[16]  Wei Wang,et al.  A clinical trial of xenotransplantation of neonatal pig islets for diabetic patients. , 2011, Zhong nan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Central South University. Medical sciences.

[17]  A. Lubiniecki Evolution of Approaches to Viral Safety Issues for Biological Products , 2011, PDA Journal of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology.

[18]  Arifa S. Khan Current Testing Methods and Challenges for Detection of Adventitious Viruses , 2011, PDA Journal of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology.

[19]  O. Garkavenko,et al.  Multiplex high resolution melting assay for estimation of Porcine Endogenous Retrovirus (PERV) relative gene dosage in pigs and detection of PERV infection in xenograft recipients. , 2011, Journal of virological methods.

[20]  H. Niemann,et al.  Development of sensitive methods for detection of porcine endogenous retrovirus-C (PERV-C) in the genome of pigs. , 2011, Journal of virological methods.

[21]  N. Mueller,et al.  Microbial safety in xenotransplantation , 2011, Current opinion in organ transplantation.

[22]  R. Valdés-González,et al.  No evidence of porcine endogenous retrovirus in patients with type 1 diabetes after long‐term porcine islet xenotransplantation , 2010, Journal of medical virology.

[23]  H. Schuurman Chapter 2: Source pigs , 2009, Xenotransplantation.

[24]  Anika Ashok,et al.  Guidance for Industry by U.S. Department of Health and Human Services—Food and Drug Administration—Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research (CBER)—February 1999 , 2009 .

[25]  P. Cochat,et al.  Et al , 2008, Archives de pediatrie : organe officiel de la Societe francaise de pediatrie.

[26]  E. Wolf,et al.  Distribution and expression of porcine endogenous retroviruses in multi‐transgenic pigs generated for xenotransplantation , 2008, Xenotransplantation.

[27]  Barry H. Smith,et al.  Encapsulation of Porcine Islets Permits Extended Culture Time and Insulin Independence in Spontaneously Diabetic BB Rats , 2007, Cell transplantation.

[28]  J. Torres,et al.  Distribution of the cellular prion protein (PrPC) in brains of livestock and domesticated species , 2006, Acta Neuropathologica.

[29]  A. Zurbriggen,et al.  [TSE surveillance in small ruminants and pigs: a pilot study]. , 2006, Schweizer Archiv fur Tierheilkunde.

[30]  R. Barker,et al.  Dura mater-associated Creutzfeldt–Jakob disease: experience from surveillance in the UK , 2006, Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry.

[31]  M. S. Brewer,et al.  Prion biology relevant to bovine spongiform encephalopathy. , 2005, Journal of animal science.

[32]  S. Sreevatsan,et al.  An overview of transmissible spongiform encephalopathies , 2004, Animal Health Research Reviews.

[33]  N. Hunter Scrapie and experimental BSE in sheep. , 2003, British medical bulletin.

[34]  S. Done,et al.  Studies of the transmissibility of the agent of bovine spongiform encephalopathy to pigs. , 2003, The Journal of general virology.

[35]  J. Denner,et al.  Differences in Release and Determination of Subtype of Porcine Endogenous Retroviruses Produced by Stimulated Normal Pig Blood Cells , 2003, Intervirology.

[36]  M. Dawson,et al.  The neuropathology of experimental bovine spongiform encephalopathy in the pig. , 2000, Journal of comparative pathology.

[37]  H. Fraser,et al.  Experimentally induced bovine spongiform encephalopathy did not transmit via goat embryos. , 1999, The Journal of general virology.

[38]  B. Hering,et al.  First update of the International Xenotransplantation Association consensus statement on conditions for undertaking clinical trials of porcine islet products in type 1 diabetes—Executive summary , 2016, Xenotransplantation.

[39]  B. Tag,et al.  Das Bundesgesetz über die Transplantation von Organen, Geweben und Zellen - die schweizerische Rechtslage zur Transplantationsmedizin , 2009 .