Geospatial data resampling and resolution effects on watershed modeling: A case study using the agricultural non-point source pollution model

Abstract.Researchers have been coupling geographic information systems (GIS) data handling and processing capability to watershed and water-quality models for many years. This capability is suited for the development of databases appropriate for water modeling. However, it is rare for GIS to provide direct inputs to the models. To demonstrate the logical procedure of coupling GIS for model parameter extraction, we selected the Agricultural Non-Point Source (AGNPS) pollution model. Investigators can generate data layers at various resolutions and resample to pixel sizes to support models at particular scales. We developed databases of elevation, land cover, and soils at various resolutions in four watersheds. The ability to use multiresolution databases for the generation of model parameters is problematic for grid-based models. We used database development procedures and observed the effects of resolution and resampling on GIS input datasets and parameters generated from those inputs for AGNPS. Results indicate that elevation values at specific points compare favorably between 3- and 30-m raster datasets. Categorical data analysis indicates that land cover classes vary significantly. Derived parameters parallel the results of the base GIS datasets. Analysis of data resampled from 30-m to 60-, 120-, 210-, 240-, 480-, 960-, and 1920-m pixels indicates a general degradation of both elevation and land cover correlations as resolution decreases. Initial evaluation of model output values for soluble nitrogen and phosphorous indicates similar degradation with resolution.

[1]  J. A. Calvin.  Regression Models for Categorical and Limited Dependent Variables , 1998 .

[2]  E. Lynn Usery,et al.  AGNPS WATERSHED MODELING WITH GIS DATABASES , 2002 .

[3]  Lawrence W. Martz,et al.  Grid size dependency of parameters extracted from digital elevation models , 1994 .

[4]  Baxter E. Vieux,et al.  DEM aggregation and smoothing effects on surface runoff modeling , 1993 .

[5]  S. Sorooshian,et al.  Calibration of watershed models , 2003 .

[6]  James R. Anderson,et al.  A land use and land cover classification system for use with remote sensor data , 1976 .

[7]  Baxter E. Vieux,et al.  Closure of "Nonpoint-Pollution Model Sensitivity to Grid-Cell Size" , 1993 .

[8]  J. R. Pittman,et al.  Water quality in the Georgia-Florida coastal plain, Georgia and Florida, 1992-96 , 1998 .

[9]  Robert J. Gilliom,et al.  A national look at water quality , 2002 .

[10]  D. Wolock,et al.  Effects of digital elevation model map scale and data resolution on a topography‐based watershed model , 1994 .

[11]  Michael E. Hodgson,et al.  What cell size does the computed slope/aspect angle represent? , 1995 .

[12]  Pixie Hamilton.  Water-Quality patterns in some of the nation's major river basins and aquifers , 2002 .

[13]  Richard E. Macur,et al.  Input parameter and model resolution effects on predictions of solute transport , 1996 .

[14]  Michael J. Oimoen,et al.  The National Elevation Dataset , 2002 .

[15]  Limin Yang,et al.  COMPLETION OF THE 1990S NATIONAL LAND COVER DATA SET FOR THE CONTERMINOUS UNITED STATES FROM LANDSAT THEMATIC MAPPER DATA AND ANCILLARY DATA SOURCES , 2001 .

[16]  S. Mostaghimi,et al.  IDENTIFICATION OF CRITICAL NONPOINT POLLUTION SOURCE AREAS USING GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEMS AND WATER QUALITY MODELING , 1992 .