Detection and discrimination of sinusoidal grating displacements.

Vertical sine-wave gratings of varying spatial frequency were stepped instantaneously to the right or to the left at differing phase angles (theta). Separate paradigms measured the contrast threshold for the detection of such a step and for the discrimination of the direction of the same step. By considering the grating before and after its displacement as a rotating phasor, we made the following predictions: (1) Contrast sensitivity for the detection of a displacement should rise as sin(theta). (2) Contrast sensitivity for the discrimination of the direction of the displacement should rise as sin(theta/2). Both predictions were confirmed using a range of spatial frequencies and phase angles. From the results of additional experiments, by measuring the discrimination of the direction thresholds as a function of contrast, we derived a nonlinear contrast response function for the motion system. This function appears to saturate fully at fairly low levels, in the neighborhood of 2 to 3% under the conditions examined. Our results suggest a direct connection among the contrast sensitivity, the contrast response function, and motion-hyperacuity thresholds.

[1]  H. Barlow,et al.  Selective Sensitivity to Direction of Movement in Ganglion Cells of the Rabbit Retina , 1963, Science.

[2]  C Blakemore,et al.  On the existence of neurones in the human visual system selectively sensitive to the orientation and size of retinal images , 1969, The Journal of physiology.

[3]  H. Barlow,et al.  Three factors limiting the reliable detection of light by retinal ganglion cells of the cat , 1969, The Journal of physiology.

[4]  K Nakayama,et al.  Local adaptation in cat LGN cells: evidence for a surround antagonism. , 1971, Vision research.

[5]  O. Braddick.  A short-range process in apparent motion. , 1974, Vision research.

[6]  J. Lappin,et al.  The detection of coherence in moving random-dot patterns , 1976, Vision Research.

[7]  A. Pantle,et al.  Motion aftereffect as a function of the contrast of sinusoidal gratings , 1976, Vision Research.

[8]  Gerald Westheimer,et al.  Spatial phase sensitivity for sinusoidal grating targets , 1978, Vision Research.

[9]  A. Pantle,et al.  Temporal frequency response characteristic of motion channels measured with three different psychophysical techniques , 1978, Perception & psychophysics.

[10]  Brian J. Murphy,et al.  Summation and discrimination of gratings moving in opposite directions , 1980, Vision Research.

[11]  M. J. Keck,et al.  Influence of the spatial periodicity of moving gratings on motion response. , 1980, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[12]  S Marcelja,et al.  Mathematical description of the responses of simple cortical cells. , 1980, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[13]  K. Nakayama,et al.  Psychophysical isolation of movement sensitivity by removal of familiar position cues , 1981, Vision Research.

[14]  G. Legge.  A power law for contrast discrimination , 1981, Vision Research.

[15]  D. Pollen,et al.  Phase relationships between adjacent simple cells in the visual cortex. , 1981, Science.

[16]  Randolph Blake,et al.  Phase effects in monoptic and dichoptic temporal integration: Flicker and motion detection , 1981, Vision Research.

[17]  K. Nakayama.  Differential motion hyperacuity under conditions of common image motion , 1981, Vision Research.

[18]  I. Ohzawa,et al.  Contrast gain control in the cat visual cortex , 1982, Nature.

[19]  C. Baker,et al.  The basis of area and dot number effects in random dot motion perception , 1982, Vision Research.

[20]  D. G. Albrecht,et al.  Striate cortex of monkey and cat: contrast response function. , 1982, Journal of neurophysiology.

[21]  R. Shapley,et al.  X and Y cells in the lateral geniculate nucleus of macaque monkeys. , 1982, The Journal of physiology.

[22]  D. Burr,et al.  Contrast sensitivity at high velocities , 1982, Vision Research.

[23]  C. Baker,et al.  Does segregation of differently moving areas depend on relative or absolute displacement? , 1982, Vision Research.

[24]  J. Movshon,et al.  The statistical reliability of signals in single neurons in cat and monkey visual cortex , 1983, Vision Research.

[25]  B. Julesz,et al.  Displacement limits for spatial frequency filtered random-dot cinematograms in apparent motion , 1983, Vision Research.

[26]  R. Watt,et al.  The recognition and representation of edge blur: Evidence for spatial primitives in human vision , 1983, Vision Research.

[27]  K. Nakayama,et al.  Temporal and spatial characteristics of the upper displacement limit for motion in random dots , 1984, Vision Research.

[28]  J. van Santen,et al.  Elaborated Reichardt detectors. , 1985, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.