Preschoolers favor the creator's label when reasoning about an artifact's function

The creator of an artifact, by virtue of having made the object, has privileged knowledge about its intended function. Do children recognize that the label an artifact's creator uses can convey this privileged information? 3- and 4-year-olds were presented with an object that looked like a member of one familiar artifact category, but which the speaker referred to with the label of a different familiar category (e.g. a key-like object was called a "spoon"). Children who heard the speaker refer to the object as something she made were more likely to assign its function on the basis of the anomalous label she used than those who heard it referred to as something the speaker found. Thus, even very young children expect a unique connection between the label the creator of an artifact uses and the function she intends it to have.

[1]  V. Jaswal,et al.  Don't believe everything you hear: preschoolers' sensitivity to speaker intent in category induction. , 2004, Child development.

[2]  L. Markson,et al.  Children's Reliance on Creator's Intent in Extending Names for Artifacts , 2003, Psychological science.

[3]  Lori Markson,et al.  Intention and Analogy in Children's Naming of Pictorial Representations , 1998 .

[4]  Susan Carey,et al.  Developmental changes within the core of artifact concepts , 2001, Cognition.

[5]  Linda B. Smith,et al.  The place of perception in children's concepts ☆ , 1993 .

[6]  Paul Bloom,et al.  Young children are sensitive to how an object was created when deciding what to name it , 2000, Cognition.

[7]  V. Sloutsky.  The role of similarity in the development of categorization , 2003, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[8]  D. Kelemen.  Are Children “Intuitive Theists”? , 2004, Psychological science.

[9]  S. Gelman,et al.  The Essential Child : Origins of Essentialism in Everyday Thought , 2003 .

[10]  Susan C. Johnson,et al.  Function and the Origins of the Design Stance , 2002 .

[11]  Paul Bloom.  Intention, history, and artifact concepts , 1996, Cognition.

[12]  Lisa M. Oakes,et al.  Early Category and Concept Development: Making Sense of the Blooming, Buzzing Confusion , 2008 .

[13]  S. Brison.  The Intentional Stance , 1989 .

[14]  P. Bloom.  How children learn the meanings of words , 2000 .

[15]  Deborah Kelemen,et al.  The scope of teleological thinking in preschool children , 1999, Cognition.

[16]  Susan A Gelman,et al.  Shape and representational status in children's early naming , 1998, Cognition.

[17]  D. Dennett.  The Intentional Stance. , 1987 .