Development of FAIR superconducting magnets and cryogenic system *

The first full size dipoles were built and tested [1]. These model tests show that the predictions established on Nuclotron model magnets are correct and thus the curved single layer magnet was the appropriate choice for the main dipole [2]. The generated AC losses were measured and a model built allowing calculating the expected loss of the dipole for any arbitrary cycle just with a few parameters [2]. Its predicted field quality matches the measured ones nicley. These results reassure that it is necessary to build the SIS100 main dipole based one a coil design with a high current cable and a single layer coil, which will provide the magnet with sufficient cooling power so that it will be able to provide even the triangular cycle [2]. This magnet has to be procured and tested. Prototype wires and cable pieces with a CuMn interfilamentary matrix were developed in frame of an INTAS project for the required high current Nuclotron cable [3]. An analysis of the source of the AC losses revealed that significant loss occurs in the nose of the stainless steel endplate, supporting the Rogowsky profile. A field analysis showed that the integral field strength non linearity is dominated by the non linearity of the B-H curve along the load line and thus a rectangular magnet end should be considered [2]. The high currenct cable, required for the main dipole, was used as basis for a 2 turn quadrupole design. This design allows constructing a G11 coil reinforcement structure and profiting from the R&D made for the dipole[2].

[1]  A. Kovalenko,et al.  Fast Ramped Superferric Prototypes and Conclusions for the Final Design of the SIS 100 Main Magnets , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity.

[2]  K. Sugita,et al.  Design Study of the Multipole Corrector Magnet for SIS 100 , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity.

[3]  P. Schnizer,et al.  Numerical Analysis of the Operation Parameters of Fast Cycling Superconducting Magnets , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity.

[4]  A. Stafiniak,et al.  Quench Measurement on SIS100 Dipole Model , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity.

[5]  A. Stafiniak,et al.  The GSI Cryogenic Prototype Test Facility—First Experience Gained on 2-Phase-Flow Superconducting Prototype Magnets of the FAIR Project , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity.

[6]  S. Farinon,et al.  Technical design report of a superconducting model dipole for FAIR SIS300 , 2009 .

[7]  V. Sytnik,et al.  SIS 300 R&D at IHEP in 2009 , 2009 .

[8]  C. Heil,et al.  SIS 100 Main Magnets: Test Results and Operation Parameters , 2009 .

[9]  A. Kovalenko,et al.  Full Size Model Magnets for the FAIR SIS100 Synchrotron , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity.

[10]  P. Shcherbakov,et al.  Analysis of the Eddy Current Relaxation Time Effects in the FAIR SIS 100 Main Magnets , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity.

[11]  S. Russenschuck,et al.  Magnetic and Thermal Characteristics of a Model Dipole Magnet for the SIS 300 , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity.

[12]  A. Kalimov,et al.  Status of the Design of a Full Length Superferric Dipole and Quadrupole Magnets for the FAIR SIS 100 Synchrotron , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity.