Statistical interpretation of chemical evidence pertaining to fire debris

Forensic examination of fire debris is a notoriously difficult analytical task due to the complexity and variability of samples encountered. The development of increasingly sophisticated analytical instrumentation facilitates greater sensitivity while drastically increasing the abundance of data produced in a single analytical run. Hybrid methods combining chemometrics and forensic statistics have been developed in order to make optimal use of the complex analytical results. This dissertation addresses the interpretation of such measurements by considering competing hypotheses and using appropriate forensic reference data. Both detection and classification tasks for ignitable liquid residue in fire debris samples are explored as valuable contributions to the investigative process and potential use in a judicial context. Assessing the evidential value of the measurements requires understanding of the analytical signal in addition to extensive comprehension of the many sources of variation within and between samples. Preliminary data processing of chromatographic samples is explored including a discussion of both common practices and an exposition of novel techniques. The statistical modelling of chemically distinctive classes of ignitable liquids and the identification of their potentially discriminative characteristics is also presented. The methods and results presented herein emphasize the importance of a deep understanding of the data produced by analytical methods and a rigorous assessment of the statistical and computational assumptions made when articulating their evidential value. Statistical interpretation of fire debris analyses is based on a general probabilistic (likelihood ratio) framework for interpretation and evaluation of evidence.

[1]  Eric Stauffer,et al.  Alternative Fuels in Fire Debris Analysis: Biodiesel Basics , 2007, Journal of forensic sciences.

[2]  J. Edward Jackson,et al.  A User's Guide to Principal Components. , 1991 .

[3]  Mary R. Williams,et al.  Application of self-organizing feature maps to analyze the relationships between ignitable liquids and selected mass spectral ions. , 2014, Forensic science international.

[4]  James Orwell,et al.  Probabilistic Classification from a K-Nearest-Neighbour Classifier , 2013 .

[5]  Berlin Chen,et al.  Generalized likelihood ratio discriminant analysis , 2009, 2009 IEEE Workshop on Automatic Speech Recognition & Understanding.

[6]  Hans-Gerd Janssen,et al.  Probability of failure of the watershed algorithm for peak detection in comprehensive two-dimensional chromatography. , 2010, Journal of chromatography. A.

[7]  Anders Nordgaard,et al.  The likelihood ratio as value of evidence—more than a question of numbers , 2012 .

[8]  Agnieszka Martyna,et al.  Wine authenticity verification as a forensic problem: an application of likelihood ratio test to label verification. , 2014, Food chemistry.

[9]  R. Zimmermann,et al.  Complete Group-Type Quantification of Petroleum Middle Distillates Based on Comprehensive Two-Dimensional Gas Chromatography Time-of-Flight Mass Spectrometry (GC×GC-TOFMS) and Visual Basic Scripting , 2014 .

[10]  Rafa FIRE DEBRIS ANALYSIS – A SURVEY OF TECHNIQUES USED FOR ACCELERANTS ISOLATION AND CONCENTRATION , 2008 .

[11]  J. Yu,et al.  Pyrolysis Products of Linear Alkylbenzenes— Implications in Fire Debris Analysis * , 2013, Journal of forensic sciences.

[12]  Martin Lopatka,et al.  Automated shape annotation for illicit tablet preparations: a contour angle based classification from digital images. , 2013, Science & justice : journal of the Forensic Science Society.

[13]  Jamie Baerncopf,et al.  A review of modern challenges in fire debris analysis. , 2014, Forensic science international.

[14]  Jack Cochran,et al.  Comprehensive characterization of the halogenated dibenzo-p-dioxin and dibenzofuran contents of residential fire debris using comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography coupled to time of flight mass spectrometry. , 2014, Journal of chromatography. A.

[15]  M. S. Fernandes,et al.  The effect of volatile residues in burnt household items on the detection of fire accelerants , 2002 .

[16]  P Mark L Sandercock,et al.  Fire investigation and ignitable liquid residue analysis--a review: 2001-2007. , 2008, Forensic science international.

[17]  Franco Taroni,et al.  Statistics and the Evaluation of Evidence for Forensic Scientists , 2004 .

[18]  J. A. Pozas,et al.  A comparison of extraction and adsorption methods for the recovery of accelerants from arson debris , 1995 .

[19]  Agnieszka Martyna,et al.  Statistical analysis in forensic science , 2014 .

[20]  Eric Stauffer,et al.  ASTM standards for fire debris analysis: a review. , 2003, Forensic science international.

[21]  M Lopatka,et al.  Probabilistic peak detection for first-order chromatographic data. , 2014, Analytica chimica acta.

[22]  Mary R. Williams,et al.  Covariance mapping in the analysis of ignitable liquids by gas chromatography/mass spectrometry. , 2006, Analytical chemistry.

[23]  Dirk Zimmer,et al.  Noise Generation for Continuous System Simulation , 2014 .

[24]  M. van Zaanen,et al.  Vibration Sensitive Keystroke Analysis , 2009 .

[25]  J. Goodpaster,et al.  Comparing the Effects of Weathering and Microbial Degradation on Gasoline Using Principal Components Analysis * , 2012, Journal of forensic sciences.

[26]  Luc Patiny,et al.  Monitoring of illicit pill distribution networks using an image collection exploration framework. , 2012, Forensic science international.

[27]  Hadi Parastar,et al.  Comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography (GC × GC) retention time shift correction and modeling using bilinear peak alignment, correlation optimized shifting and multivariate curve resolution , 2012 .

[28]  Mary R. Williams,et al.  Hierarchical Cluster Analysis of Ignitable Liquids Based on the Total Ion Spectrum , 2014, Journal of forensic sciences.

[29]  Richard D. Deveaux,et al.  Applied Smoothing Techniques for Data Analysis , 1999, Technometrics.

[30]  Ying-yu Li,et al.  An Analysis of Background Interference on Fire Debris , 2013 .

[31]  James Curran,et al.  A graphical simulation model of the entire DNA process associated with the analysis of short tandem repeat loci , 2005, Nucleic acids research.

[32]  V. McGuffin,et al.  Effect of evaporation and matrix interferences on the association of simulated ignitable liquid residues to the corresponding liquid standard. , 2012, Forensic science international.

[33]  M. Aalders,et al.  Objective Color Classification of Ecstasy Tablets by Hyperspectral Imaging , 2013, Journal of forensic sciences.

[34]  Mary R. Williams,et al.  Progress Toward the Determination of Correct Classification Rates in Fire Debris Analysis II: Utilizing Soft Independent Modeling of Class Analogy (SIMCA) , 2014, Journal of forensic sciences.

[35]  G Zadora,et al.  Likelihood ratio model for classification of forensic evidence. , 2009, Analytica chimica acta.

[36]  Erin Waddell,et al.  Chemometric Applications To A Complex Classification Problem: Forensic Fire Debris Analysis , 2013 .

[37]  D Meuwly,et al.  Forensic individualisation from biometric data. , 2006, Science & justice : journal of the Forensic Science Society.

[38]  Eric Stauffer,et al.  Concept of pyrolysis for fire debris analysts , 2003 .

[39]  Tormod Næs,et al.  A user-friendly guide to multivariate calibration and classification , 2002 .

[40]  Robert P. W. Duin,et al.  Classifier Conditional Posterior Probabilities , 1998, SSPR/SPR.

[41]  Jeanet Hendrikse,et al.  ENFSI collaborative testing programme for ignitable liquid analysis: a review. , 2007, Forensic science international.

[42]  Erica Beecher-Monas,et al.  Evaluating Scientific Evidence: An Interdisciplinary Framework for Intellectual Due Process , 2006 .

[43]  Peter Norvig,et al.  Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach , 1995 .

[44]  M Lopatka,et al.  Surface granularity as a discriminating feature of illicit tablets. , 2011, Forensic science international.

[45]  Brian A. McGaw,et al.  Trends in Analytical Chemistry, Reference Edition, Volume 15, 1996. Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1996, x+677+S190pp. ISSN 0167-2940. , 1999 .

[46]  G. M. Mong,et al.  Impurity profiling of a chemical weapon precursor for possible forensic signatures by comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography/mass spectrometry and chemometrics. , 2010, Analytical chemistry.

[47]  Mary R. Williams,et al.  Progress Toward the Determination of Correct Classification Rates in Fire Debris Analysis , , , 2013, Journal of forensic sciences.

[48]  Age K. Smilde,et al.  Metabolic network discovery through reverse engineering of metabolome data , 2009, Metabolomics.

[49]  U. Brinkman,et al.  Comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography: a powerful and versatile analytical tool. , 2003, Journal of chromatography. A.

[50]  U. Brinkman,et al.  Recent developments in the application of comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography. , 2008, Journal of chromatography. A.

[51]  Michael E. Sigman,et al.  Ignitable Liquid Classification and Identification Using the Summed-Ion Mass Spectrum , 2008 .

[52]  Pierre Esseiva,et al.  Different likelihood ratio approaches to evaluate the strength of evidence of MDMA tablet comparisons. , 2009, Forensic science international.