Exploring Performances of Electric Micro-Mobility Vehicles and Behavioural Patterns of Riders for In-Depth Accident Analysis

(1) Background: Electric micro-mobility vehicles (i.e., e-bikes and e-scooters) represent a fast-growing portion of the circulating fleet, leading to a multiplication of accident cases also attributable to risky behaviours adopted by the riders. Still, data on vehicle performance and rider behaviour are sparse and difficult to interpret (if not unavailable). Information regarding the overall accident dynamics can, however, aid in identifying users’ risky riding behaviour that actually led to a harmful event, allowing one to propose efficient strategies and policies to reduce the occurrence of road criticalities. (2) Methods: Speed and acceleration data of six cyclists of traditional and electric bikes were extracted from six closed-circuit experiments and real road tests performed in the city of Florence (Italy) to derive their behavioural patterns in diverse road contexts. (3) Results: The application of analysis of variance and linear regression procedures to such data highlights differences between men and women in terms of performance/behaviour in standing start; additionally, the use of e-bikes favours a higher speed ride in correspondence to roundabouts and roads with/without the right of way. To thoroughly assess the rider’s responsibilities in an eventual accident, an ancillary procedure was highlighted to evaluate whether a micro-mobility vehicle complies with the applicable regulations. (4) Conclusion: With these results, the prospective recognition of rider behaviour was facilitated during the investigation process, and the abilities to extract such relevant information from in-depth accident data wereconsequently enhanced.

[1]  Carlo Cialdai,et al.  Vehicle stiffness assessment for energy loss evaluation in vehicle impacts. , 2019, Forensic science international.

[2]  Leonardo Di Gangi,et al.  Injury risk assessment based on pre-crash variables: The role of closing velocity and impact eccentricity. , 2020, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[3]  L. Ruhrort Reassessing the Role of Shared Mobility Services in a Transport Transition: Can They Contribute the Rise of an Alternative Socio-Technical Regime of Mobility? , 2020, Sustainability.

[4]  Michael Branion-Calles,et al.  To scoot or not to scoot: Findings from a recent survey about the benefits and barriers of using E-scooters for riders and non-riders , 2020 .

[5]  David A. Krauss,et al.  Behavior of Electric Scooter Operators in Naturalistic Environments , 2019, SAE Technical Paper Series.

[6]  Maya Siman-Tov,et al.  The casualties from electric bike and motorized scooter road accidents , 2017, Traffic injury prevention.

[7]  Marco Dozza,et al.  E-bikers' braking behavior: Results from a naturalistic cycling study. , 2019, Traffic injury prevention.

[8]  Xingchen Yan,et al.  Analyzing E-Bikers’ Risky Riding Behaviors, Safety Attitudes, Risk Perception, and Riding Confidence with the Structural Equation Model , 2020, International journal of environmental research and public health.

[10]  J. D. Winter,et al.  PC-based hazard anticipation training for experienced cyclists: Design and evaluation , 2020 .

[11]  W. Fan,et al.  Cyclist injury severity analysis with mixed-logit models at intersections and nonintersection locations , 2019, Journal of Transportation Safety & Security.

[12]  F. Lippert,et al.  Injury from electric scooters in Copenhagen: a retrospective cohort study , 2019, BMJ Open.

[13]  Isabelle Ragot-Court,et al.  Assessment of risky behaviours among E-bike users: A comparative study in Shanghai , 2019, Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives.

[14]  Marco Dozza,et al.  Using naturalistic data to assess e-cyclist behavior , 2016 .

[15]  Josef F. Krems,et al.  The German Naturalistic Cycling Study – Comparing cycling speed of riders of different e-bikes and conventional bicycles , 2014 .

[16]  Barbara Laa,et al.  Survey of E-scooter users in Vienna: Who they are and how they ride , 2020 .

[17]  Dietmar Otte,et al.  Accident typology comparisons between pedelecs and conventional bicycles , 2020, Journal of Transportation Safety & Security.

[18]  Min He,et al.  Dynamics of electric bike ownership and use in Kunming, China , 2016 .

[19]  Francisco Alonso,et al.  Socioeconomic Status, Health and Lifestyle Settings as Psychosocial Risk Factors for Road Crashes in Young People: Assessing the Colombian Case , 2021, International journal of environmental research and public health.

[20]  Luciano R Costa,et al.  Car speed estimation based on image scale factor. , 2020, Forensic science international.

[21]  Tibor Petzoldt,et al.  Traffic conflicts and their contextual factors when riding conventional vs. electric bicycles , 2017 .

[22]  Michael McQueen,et al.  The E-Bike Potential: Estimating regional e-bike impacts on greenhouse gas emissions , 2020 .

[23]  Michiel Christoph,et al.  Speed choice and mental workload of elderly cyclists on e-bikes in simple and complex traffic situations: a field experiment. , 2015, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[24]  Tibor Petzoldt,et al.  The influence of speed, cyclists' age, pedaling frequency, and observer age on observers' time to arrival judgments of approaching bicycles and e-bikes. , 2016, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[25]  M. Burinskienė,et al.  Challenges Caused by Increased Use of E-Powered Personal Mobility Vehicles in European Cities , 2019 .

[26]  Tsutomu Suzuki,et al.  Quantifying e-bike applicability by comparing travel time and physical energy expenditure: A case study of Japanese cities , 2019, Journal of Transport & Health.

[27]  Alberto Doria,et al.  The influence of the dynamic response of the rider’s body on the open-loop stability of a bicycle , 2014 .

[28]  Chung-Cheng Lu,et al.  Adoption intentions for micro-mobility – Insights from electric scooter sharing in Taiwan , 2020 .

[29]  Brian Casey Langford,et al.  Risky riding: Naturalistic methods comparing safety behavior from conventional bicycle riders and electric bike riders. , 2015, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[30]  Christopher R. Cherry,et al.  Comparing physical activity of pedal-assist electric bikes with walking and conventional bicycles , 2017 .

[31]  Robin S. Sharp Optimal stabilization and path-following controls for a bicycle , 2007 .

[32]  David Raffo,et al.  Electrically-assisted bikes: potential impacts on travel behaviour , 2017 .

[33]  M. Kück,et al.  Everyday Pedelec Use and Its Effect on Meeting Physical Activity Guidelines , 2020, International journal of environmental research and public health.

[34]  A. Fyhri,et al.  Do people who buy e-bikes cycle more? , 2020 .

[35]  Zhongxiang Feng,et al.  Risk Riding Behaviors of Urban E-Bikes: A Literature Review , 2019, International journal of environmental research and public health.

[36]  Inhwan Han,et al.  Car speed estimation based on cross-ratio using video data of car-mounted camera (black box). , 2016, Forensic science international.

[37]  Mette Møller,et al.  E-bike safety: Individual-level factors and incident characteristics , 2016 .

[38]  Weixu Wang,et al.  Comparative analysis of the safety effects of electric bikes at signalized intersections , 2013 .