Ability of navigated 3D ultrasound to delineate gliomas and metastases – comparison of image interpretations with histopathology

SummaryBackground. The objective of the study was to test the ability of a 3D ultrasound (US) based intraoperative imaging and navigation system to delineate gliomas and metastases in a clinical setting. The 3D US data is displayed as reformatted 2D image slices. The quality of the displayed 3D data is affected both by the resolution of the acquired data and the reformatting process. In order to investigate whether or not 3D US could be used for reliable guidance in tumour surgery, a study was initiated to compare interpretations of imaged biopsy sites with histopathology. The system also enabled concomitant comparison of navigated preoperative MR with histopathology.Method. Eighty-five biopsies were sampled between 2–7 mm from the tumour border visible in the ultrasound images. Biopsies were collected from 28 operations (7 low-grade astrocytomas, 8 anaplastic astrocytomas, 7 glioblastomas and 6 metastases). Corresponding cross-sections of preoperative MR T1, MR T2 and intraoperative US were concomitantly displayed, steered by the biopsy forceps equipped with a positioning sensor. The surgeons’ interpretation of the images at the electronically indicated biopsy sites were compared with the histopathology of the samples.Findings. The ultrasound findings were in agreement with histopathology in 74% (n = 31) for low-grade astrocytomas, 83% (n = 18) for anaplastic astrocytomas, 77% (n = 26) for glioblastomas and 100% (n = 10) for metastases. Excluding irradiated patients, the results for glioblastomas improved to 80% concurrence (n = 20). As expected tumour cells were found in biopsies outside the US visible tumour border, especially in low-grade gliomas. Navigated 3D US have a significantly better agreement with histopathology than navigated MR T1 for low-grade astrocytomas.Conclusion. Reformatted images from 3D US volumes give a good delineation of metastases and the solid part of gliomas before starting the resection. Navigated 3D US is at least as reliable as navigated 3D MR to delineate gliomas and metastases.

[1]  Mitchel S. Berger,et al.  Low grade gliomas: comparison of intraoperative ultrasound characteristics with preoperative imaging studies , 1992, Journal of Neuro-Oncology.

[2]  Michael S. Berger,et al.  A comparison between preoperative magnetic resonance and intraoperative ultrasound tumor volumes and margins , 1994, Journal of clinical ultrasound : JCU.

[3]  S Kellermann,et al.  Gross-total surgery of supratentorial low-grade gliomas under intraoperative MR guidance. , 2001, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[4]  B A Kall,et al.  Imaging-based stereotaxic serial biopsies in untreated intracranial glial neoplasms. , 1987, Journal of neurosurgery.

[5]  V. Tronnier,et al.  Initial Experience with an Ultrasound-Integrated Single-Rack Neuronavigation System , 2001, Acta Neurochirurgica.

[6]  M. Westphal,et al.  Ultrasound-guided surgery of deep seated brain lesions. , 2000, European journal of ultrasound : official journal of the European Federation of Societies for Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology.

[7]  F. Lindseth,et al.  SonoWand, an Ultrasound-based Neuronavigation System , 2000, Neurosurgery.

[8]  M M Bonsanto,et al.  Clinical evaluation and follow-up results for intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging in neurosurgery. , 2000, Neurosurgery.

[9]  N. Di Lorenzo,et al.  A comparison of computerized tomography-guided stereotactic and ultrasound-guided techniques for brain biopsy. , 1991, Journal of neurosurgery.

[10]  K. Takakura,et al.  Development of a frameless and armless stereotactic neuronavigation system with ultrasonographic registration. , 1997, Neurosurgery.

[11]  L D Lunsford,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging does not define tumor boundaries. , 1986, Acta radiologica. Supplementum.

[12]  R L Ehman,et al.  Cerebral astrocytomas: histopathologic correlation of MR and CT contrast enhancement with stereotactic biopsy. , 1988, Radiology.

[13]  Geirmund Unsgaard,et al.  Neuronavigation by Intraoperative Three-dimensional Ultrasound: Initial Experience during Brain Tumor Resection , 2002, Neurosurgery.

[14]  G. Ojemann,et al.  Correlation of intraoperative ultrasound tumor volumes and margins with preoperative computerized tomography scans. An intraoperative method to enhance tumor resection. , 1989, Journal of neurosurgery.

[15]  C R Wirtz,et al.  Intraoperative MR imaging increases the extent of tumor resection in patients with high-grade gliomas. , 1999, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[16]  F. Lindseth,et al.  Accuracy evaluation of a 3D ultrasound-based neuronavigation system. , 2002, Computer aided surgery : official journal of the International Society for Computer Aided Surgery.

[17]  J. Koivukangas,et al.  Ultrasound-controlled neuronavigator-guided brain surgery. , 1993, Journal of neurosurgery.

[18]  W. Hall,et al.  Brain tumor resection: intraoperative monitoring with high-field-strength MR imaging-initial results. , 2000, Radiology.

[19]  R. Sawaya,et al.  Use of intraoperative ultrasound for localizing tumors and determining the extent of resection: a comparative study with magnetic resonance imaging. , 1996, Journal of neurosurgery.

[20]  Geirmund Unsgaard,et al.  Brain Operations Guided by Real-time Two-dimensional Ultrasound: New Possibilities as a Result of Improved Image Quality , 2002, Neurosurgery.

[21]  M. Woydt,et al.  Correlation of intra-operative ultrasound with histopathologic findings after tumour resection in supratentorial gliomas , 2005, Acta Neurochirurgica.

[22]  G. Fuller.  Pathology and Genetics of Tumours of the Nervous System (World Health Organization Classification of Tumours). , 2001 .

[23]  T. Peters,et al.  Intraoperative ultrasound for guidance and tissue shift correction in image-guided neurosurgery. , 2000, Medical physics.

[24]  Donald W. Kormos,et al.  Glioma Resection in a Shared-resource Magnetic Resonance Operating Room after Optimal Image-guided Frameless Stereotactic Resection , 2001, Neurosurgery.

[25]  I. Puls,et al.  Early Postoperative Transcranial Sonography (TCS), CT, and MRI after Resection of High Grade Glioma: Evaluation of Residual Tumour and its Influence on Prognosis , 2000, Acta Neurochirurgica.

[26]  L. Auer,et al.  Intraoperative ultrasound (US) imaging. Comparison of pathomorphological findings in US and CT , 2005, Acta Neurochirurgica.