Selective effects of nicotine on attentional processes

Abstract  Rationale: It is now well established from electrophysiological and behavioural evidence that nicotine has effects on information processing. The results are usually explained either by a primary effect of nicotine or by a reversal effect of a nicotine-induced, abstinence deficit. In addition, there is dispute about the cognitive processes underlying the changes in performance. Methods: This study has approached the first question by using the nicotine patch, in order to administer nicotine chronically. In addition, we examined the effects of nicotine on attention with a selection of tests which assessed the intensity and selectivity features of attention, using the Random Letter Generation test, the Flexibility of Attention test and the Stroop test. Results: Nicotine enhanced the speed of number generation and the speed of processing in both the control and interference conditions of the Stroop test. There were no effects on attentional switching of the Flexibility of Attention test. Conclusion: The results are consistent with the hypothesis that nicotine mainly improves the intensity feature of attention, rather than the selectivity feature.

[1]  K. Bättig,et al.  Psychophysiological correlates of conflict solving and cigarette smoking. , 1983, Activitas nervosa superior.

[2]  D. Warburton,et al.  Evaluation of the information processing and mood effects of a transdermal nicotine patch , 1998, Psychopharmacology.

[3]  N. Benowitz,et al.  Stable isotope method for studying transdermal drug absorption: The nicotine patch , 1991, Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics.

[4]  Alan D. Baddeley,et al.  Working memory or working attention , 1993 .

[5]  A D Baddeley,et al.  The Capacity for Generating Information by Randomization , 1966, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[6]  Donald A. Norman,et al.  Attention to Action , 1986 .

[7]  James L. McClelland,et al.  On the control of automatic processes: a parallel distributed processing account of the Stroop effect. , 1990, Psychological review.

[8]  Mauro Pesenti,et al.  Age-Related Differences in Random Generation , 1998, Brain and Cognition.

[9]  K. Bättig,et al.  Effects of a 2-Day Abstinence From Smoking on Dietary, Cognitive, Subjective, and Physiologic Parameters Among Younger and Older Female Smokers , 1997, Physiology & Behavior.

[10]  W. Brouwer,et al.  Clinical Neuropsychology of Attention , 1994 .

[11]  W. R. Garner.  Applications of Information Theory to Psychology , 1959 .

[12]  Karl Bättig,et al.  Action profiles of smoking and caffeine: Stroop effect, EEG, and peripheral physiology , 1992, Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior.

[13]  F. Teuscher,et al.  Effects of nicotine abstinence and menstrual phase on task performance. , 1994, Addictive behaviors.

[14]  N. Sherwood,et al.  Effects of nicotine on human psychomotor performance , 1993 .

[15]  D. Crews,et al.  The effects of smokeless tobacco on performance and psychophysiological response. , 1992, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[16]  Colin M. Macleod.  Half a century of research on the Stroop effect: an integrative review. , 1991, Psychological bulletin.

[17]  D. Norman,et al.  Attention to action: Willed and automatic control , 1980 .

[18]  Jack E. Henningfield,et al.  Nicotine and Smoking: A Review of Effects on Human Performance , 1994 .

[19]  A Gale,et al.  Evidence of more rapid stimulus evaluation following cigarette smoking. , 1985, Addictive behaviors.

[20]  A. Parrott,et al.  Cigarette smoking and nicotine gum (0, 2 and 4 mg): effects upon four visual attention tasks. , 1992, Neuropsychobiology.

[21]  D. Warburton.  A State Model for Mental Effort , 1986 .