How Display Shapes Affect 360-Degree Panoramic Video Communication

Field-of-view limitation has been a long-standing issue in video communication systems. With the advancement of omnidirectional panoramic technology, the omnidirectional camera, which can provide a 360° field of view, has become increasingly popular in the last few years. Previous research indicated that one-way video communication systems with a wider field of view improve task efficiency. Therefore, we propose to utilize omnidirectional cameras in a symmetrical video communication system and study how this configuration affects remote collaboration. In this study, we conducted experiments based on two conditions, which are an omnidirectional camera with a spherical display and an omnidirectional camera with a horizontally placed 2D flat display. Under these conditions, we analyzed how the display types affected remote collaboration. Our results show that participants marginally preferred the spherical display to the 2D flat display. We also show the advantages and disadvantages of each display. The findings contribute to our understanding of how to design an environment for remote collaboration that captures and shows a 360° panoramic view of a remote site.

[1]  Anthony Steed,et al.  SphereAvatar: a situated display to represent a remote collaborator , 2012, CHI.

[2]  Carman Neustaedter,et al.  Collaboration with 360° Videochat: Challenges and Opportunities , 2017, Conference on Designing Interactive Systems.

[3]  Jun Rekimoto,et al.  JackIn Head: Immersive Visual Telepresence System with Omnidirectional Wearable Camera , 2017, IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph..

[4]  Carman Neustaedter,et al.  Mechanics of Camera Work in Mobile Video Collaboration , 2015, CHI.

[5]  Tamotsu Machida GEO-COSMOS: world's first spherical display , 2002, SIGGRAPH '02.

[6]  William W. Gaver,et al.  A Virtual Window on media space , 1995, CHI '95.

[7]  Robert E. Kraut,et al.  Coordination of communication: effects of shared visual context on collaborative work , 2000, CSCW '00.

[8]  Hideki Koike,et al.  OmniEyeball: Spherical Display Embedded With Omnidirectional Camera Using Dynamic Spherical Mapping , 2016, UIST.

[9]  Anthony Steed,et al.  Comparing flat and spherical displays in a trust scenario in avatar-mediated interaction , 2014, CHI.

[10]  Marcelo Knörich Zuffo,et al.  Spheree: a 3D perspective-corrected interactive spherical scalable display , 2014, SIGGRAPH '14.

[11]  Hideaki Kuzuoka,et al.  Showing Objects: Holding and Manipulating Artefacts in Video-mediated Collaborative Settings , 2017, CHI.

[12]  Robert E. Kraut,et al.  The VideoWindow system in informal communication , 1990, CSCW '90.

[13]  Hideki Koike,et al.  Ballumiere: Real-Time Tracking and Spherical Projection for High-Speed Moving Balls , 2016, ISS.

[14]  William W. Gaver The affordances of media spaces for collaboration , 1992, CSCW '92.

[15]  Hideaki Kuzuoka,et al.  Improving visibility of remote gestures in distributed tabletop collaboration , 2011, CSCW '11.

[16]  James Norris,et al.  Putting things in focus: establishing co-orientation through video in context , 2013, CHI.

[17]  Abigail Sellen,et al.  One is not enough: multiple views in a media space , 1993, INTERCHI.

[18]  Luc Van Gool,et al.  Blue-c: a spatially immersive display and 3D video portal for telepresence , 2003, IPT/EGVE.

[19]  Hideaki Kuzuoka,et al.  Flexible Ecologies And Incongruent Locations , 2015, CHI.

[20]  Bin Xu,et al.  Attention from Afar: Simulating the Gazes of Remote Participants in Hybrid Meetings , 2017, Conference on Designing Interactive Systems.

[21]  Anthony Steed,et al.  Preserving gaze direction in teleconferencing using a camera array and a spherical display , 2012, 2012 3DTV-Conference: The True Vision - Capture, Transmission and Display of 3D Video (3DTV-CON).

[22]  Hideaki Kuzuoka,et al.  Impact of seating positions on group video communication , 2008, CSCW.

[23]  Hrvoje Benko,et al.  Multi-point interactions with immersive omnidirectional visualizations in a dome , 2010, ITS '10.

[24]  Roel Vertegaal,et al.  Organic user interfaces: designing computers in any way, shape, or form , 2007, CACM.

[25]  Ravin Balakrishnan,et al.  Sphere: multi-touch interactions on a spherical display , 2008, UIST '08.

[26]  Christian Heath,et al.  The Naturalistic Experiment , 2018 .

[27]  Hideaki Kuzuoka,et al.  Fractured Ecologies: Creating Environments for Collaboration , 2003, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[28]  Bilge Mutlu,et al.  Can You See Me Now?: How Field of View Affects Collaboration in Robotic Telepresence , 2015, CHI.