Delayed offset of distracters masks a local target.

[1]  Johan Wagemans,et al.  Time-course contingencies in perceptual organization and identification of fragmented object outlines. , 2009, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[2]  H. Pratt,et al.  Perceptual visual grouping under inattention: Electrophysiological functional imaging , 2008, Brain and Cognition.

[3]  Talis Bachmann,et al.  Luminance processing in object substitution masking , 2008, Vision Research.

[4]  James T. Enns,et al.  Object substitution masking , 2008, Scholarpedia.

[5]  Hidenao Fukuyama,et al.  Recovery from object substitution masking induced by transient suppression of visual motion processing: a repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation study. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[6]  Ronald A. Rensink,et al.  Consequences of display changes during interrupted visual search: Rapid resumption is target specific , 2007, Perception & psychophysics.

[7]  R. Kimchi,et al.  The time course of perceptual grouping: The role of segregation and shape formation , 2007, Perception & psychophysics.

[8]  Thomas A Carlson,et al.  No Representation Without Awareness in the Lateral Occipital Cortex , 2007, Psychological science.

[9]  Michael Pilling,et al.  What is being masked in object substitution masking? , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[10]  Alejandro Lleras,et al.  On the role of object representations in substitution masking. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[11]  R. Kimchi,et al.  Perceptual grouping and attention: Not all groupings are equal , 2004, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[12]  Matthew S. Tata,et al.  Warning: Attending to a mask may be hazardous to your perception , 2004, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[13]  D. Navon.  What does a compound letter tell the psychologist's mind? , 2003, Acta psychologica.

[14]  Glyn W. Humphreys,et al.  Visual marking: using time in visual selection , 2003, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[15]  C. Moore,et al.  When the target becomes the mask: using apparent motion to isolate the object-level component of object substitution masking. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[16]  Katherine M. Mathis,et al.  Gestalt grouping and common onset masking , 2002, Perception & psychophysics.

[17]  Matthew S. Tata,et al.  Attend to it now or lose it forever: Selective attention, metacontrast masking, and object substitution , 2002, Perception & psychophysics.

[18]  J. Enns.  Visual binding in the standing wave illusion , 2002, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[19]  Keith A Hutchison,et al.  Masking by object substitution: dissociation of masking and cuing effects. , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[20]  María J. Blanca,et al.  Effect of the similarity between target and global and local levels in hierarchical stimuli processing , 2002, Psychological research.

[21]  A. Gellatly,et al.  Effect of object onset on the distribution of visual attention. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[22]  M. Chun,et al.  The spatial gradient of visual masking by object substitution , 2001, Vision Research.

[23]  S Yantis,et al.  Attentional capture by globally defined objects , 2001, Perception & psychophysics.

[24]  M. Chun,et al.  Asymmetric object substitution masking. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[25]  J. Driver,et al.  Segmentation, attention and phenomenal visual objects , 2001, Cognition.

[26]  Ronald A. Rensink,et al.  Competition for consciousness among visual events: the psychophysics of reentrant visual processes. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[27]  A. Gellatly,et al.  Accuracy of target detection in new-object and old-object displays. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[28]  A. Gellatly,et al.  Do equiluminant object onsets capture visual attention? , 1999, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[29]  Bradley S. Gibson,et al.  Stimulus-Driven Attentional Capture Is Contingent on Attentional Set for Displaywide Visual Features , 1998 .

[30]  M. Kubovy,et al.  On the Lawfulness of Grouping by Proximity , 1998, Cognitive Psychology.

[31]  I. Rock,et al.  Inattentional blindness: Perception without attention. , 1998 .

[32]  B. Gibson,et al.  Stimulus-driven attentional capture is contingent on attentional set for displaywide visual features. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[33]  J. Enns,et al.  Object Substitution: A New Form of Masking in Unattended Visual Locations , 1997 .

[34]  D D Kurylo,et al.  Time course of perceptual grouping , 1997, Perception & psychophysics.

[35]  John G. Taylor,et al.  A competition for consciousness? , 1996, Neurocomputing.

[36]  Johan Wagemans,et al.  Higher-order structure in regularity detection , 1993, Vision Research.

[37]  J. C. Johnston,et al.  Involuntary covert orienting is contingent on attentional control settings. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[38]  I. Rock,et al.  Perception without attention: Results of a new method , 1992, Cognitive Psychology.

[39]  I. Rock,et al.  Perceptual organization and attention , 1992, Cognitive Psychology.

[40]  G. Baylis,et al.  Visual parsing and response competition: The effect of grouping factors , 1992, Perception & psychophysics.

[41]  D. Navon,et al.  Testing a queue hypothesis for the processing of global and local information. , 1991, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[42]  D. Navon.  Does attention serve to integrate features , 1990 .

[43]  J. R. Pomerantz,et al.  Emergent features, attention, and perceptual glue in visual form perception. , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[44]  A Treisman,et al.  Feature analysis in early vision: evidence from search asymmetries. , 1988, Psychological review.

[45]  S. Yantis,et al.  Abrupt visual onsets and selective attention: evidence from visual search. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[46]  Raja Parasuraman,et al.  Varieties of attention , 1984 .

[47]  J. Duncan.  Selective attention and the organization of visual information. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[48]  D Navon,et al.  How Many Trees Does it Take to Make a Forest? , 1983, Perception.

[49]  A Treisman,et al.  Perceptual objects and the cost of filtering , 1983, Perception & psychophysics.

[50]  D. Navon,et al.  Do attention and decision follow perception Comment on Miller. , 1981, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[51]  I. Rock,et al.  The effect of inattention on form perception. , 1981, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[52]  D. Navon.  Perception of misoriented words and letter strings. , 1978, Canadian journal of psychology.

[53]  N. F. Johnson,et al.  Identification of words and letters within words. , 1978, The American journal of psychology.

[54]  D. Navon.  Forest before trees: The precedence of global features in visual perception , 1977, Cognitive Psychology.

[55]  Neal F. Johnson,et al.  On the function of letters in word identification: Some data and a preliminary model , 1975 .

[56]  J. C. Johnston,et al.  Perception of Letters in Words: Seek Not and Ye Shall Find , 1974, Science.

[57]  G. M. Reicher.  Perceptual recognition as a function of meaninfulness of stimulus material. , 1969, Journal of experimental psychology.

[58]  U. Neisser.  Cognitive Psychology: Classic Edition , 1967 .

[59]  W. R. Garner,et al.  Goodness of pattern and pattern uncertainty. , 1963 .