Quantitative analysis of thermographic data through different algorithms

Abstract Pulsed thermography is commonly used as non-destructive technique for evaluating defects within materials and components. However, raw thermal imaging data are usually not suitable for quantitative evaluation of defects. It was necessary to process the raw thermal data acquired to obtain a series of satisfactory results for a correct and quantitative material evaluation. In the last years, many data processing algorithms have been developed and each of them provide enhanced detection and sizing of flaws. In this work, starting from the same brief pulsed thermographic test carried out on an aluminium specimen with twenty flat bottom holes of known nominal size, different algorithms have been compared. The algorithms used have been: Pulsed Phase Thermography (PPT), Slope, Correlation Coefficient (R 2 ), Thermal Signal Reconstruction (TSR), Principal Component Analysis (PCT). By analysing the results obtained using different approaches, it was possible to focus on the advantages, disadvantages and sensitivity of the various thermographic algorithms implemented.

[1]  Steven M. Shepard,et al.  Advances in pulsed thermography , 2001, SPIE Defense + Commercial Sensing.

[2]  Davide Palumbo,et al.  A new rapid thermographic method to assess the fatigue limit in GFRP composites , 2016 .

[3]  Jose Miguel Lopez-Higuera,et al.  Quantification by Signal to Noise Ratio of Active Infrared Thermography Data Processing Techniques , 2013 .

[4]  Daniel L. Balageas,et al.  Defense and illustration of time-resolved pulsed thermography for NDE , 2012 .

[5]  Davide Palumbo,et al.  Quantitative damage evaluation of composite materials with microwave thermographic technique: feasibility and new data analysis , 2015 .

[6]  Davide Palumbo,et al.  Damage Investigation in Composite Materials by Means of New Thermal Data Processing Procedures , 2016 .

[7]  Davide Palumbo,et al.  Assessment of the effect of defects on mechanical properties of adhesive bonded joints by using non destructive methods , 2016 .

[8]  Daniel L. Balageas,et al.  Comparative Assessment of Thermal NDT Data Processing Techniques for Carbon Fiber Reinforced Polymers , 2017 .

[9]  Davide Palumbo,et al.  Study of damage evolution in composite materials based on the Thermoelastic Phase Analysis (TPA) method , 2017 .

[10]  Jiangang Sun,et al.  Analysis of data processing methods for pulsed thermal imaging characterisation of delaminations , 2013 .

[11]  Carosena Meola,et al.  Comparison between pulsed and modulated thermography in glass-epoxy laminates , 2002 .

[12]  D. Palumbo,et al.  Ultrasonic analysis and lock-in thermography for debonding evaluation of composite adhesive joints , 2016 .