Enhanced Model for Measuring Information Systems Success

The increased use of information systems (IS) has led to a number of changes in the workflow of the private and public sectors; they play a vital role when they are reliable and of high quality. The quality of the information systems plays a decisive role in the success of the system, and the best performance of the organization depends on the successful implementation of the IS. The quality and success of the information system have been widely discussed over the past two decades. As systems and technologies are improved and developed, researchers and practitioners have debated debates about their effectiveness and evaluation. In addition to the major concern about the effectiveness of information systems, the factors influencing the efficiency of information systems are also important. Several researchers have created models for measuring quality and the success of the information system [1, 2]; highlighting the need for better and more consistent success factors. However, several authors claim that there are several measures of success of an IS, which generates a certain amount of confusion, especially since there are few recognized criteria for choosing indicators of success [3], These same authors add that the current measuring instruments of IS’s success rest on poor theoretical foundations. To this end, our contribution in this paper is to propose a new holistic model that brings together several factors (technological, organizational, human and change management) to measure the quality and success of an information system, and to apply the AHP multicriteria prioritization method for the selection and prioritization of these criteria.

[1]  Darshana Sedera,et al.  Enterprise Systems Success: A Measurement Model , 2003, ICIS.

[2]  Gwo-Hshiung Tzeng,et al.  Creating the aspired intelligent assessment systems for teaching materials , 2011, Expert Syst. Appl..

[3]  Phillip Ein-Dor,et al.  Strategic Planning for Management Information Systems , 1978 .

[4]  Anol Bhattacherjee,et al.  Understanding Information Systems Continuance: An Expectation-Confirmation Model , 2001, MIS Q..

[5]  David Gitumu Mugo,et al.  The Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) and its Application to the Utilization of Mobile Learning Technologies , 2017 .

[6]  Ephraim R. McLean,et al.  The DeLone and McLean Model of Information Systems Success: A Ten-Year Update , 2003, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[7]  Peter B. Seddon A Respecification and Extension of the DeLone and McLean Model of IS Success , 1997, Inf. Syst. Res..

[8]  Alphonse Chapanis,et al.  Human factors in systems engineering , 1996 .

[9]  William J. Kettinger,et al.  Pragmatic Perspectives on the Measurement of Information Systems Service Quality Analysis with LISREL : An Appendix to Pragmatic Perspectives on the Measurement of Information Systems Service Quality , 2002 .

[10]  P. C. Lai,et al.  The literature review of technology adoption models and theories for the novelty technology , 2017 .

[11]  Vangalur S. Alagar,et al.  Context-Aware Systems and Applications , 2014, Mob. Networks Appl..

[12]  Leon A. Kappelman,et al.  Measuring Information Systems Service Quality: Concerns on the Use of the SERVQUAL Questionnaire , 1997, MIS Q..

[13]  Ephraim R. McLean,et al.  Measuring information systems success: models, dimensions, measures, and interrelationships , 2008, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[14]  Brian Hollocks,et al.  Managing Management Information Systems , 1978 .

[15]  Ephraim R. McLean,et al.  Information Systems Success: The Quest for the Dependent Variable , 1992, Inf. Syst. Res..

[16]  Richard T. Watson,et al.  Service Quality: A Measure of Information System Effectiveness , 1995, MIS Q..

[17]  William J. Doll,et al.  The Measurement of End-User Computing Satisfaction , 1988, MIS Q..

[18]  Juhani Iivari,et al.  An empirical test of the DeLone-McLean model of information system success , 2005, DATB.

[19]  Fred D. Davis,et al.  User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models , 1989 .

[20]  T. Saaty,et al.  The Analytic Hierarchy Process , 1985 .

[21]  Gordon B. Davis,et al.  User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View , 2003, MIS Q..

[22]  D. Sandy Staples,et al.  Dimensions of Information Systems Success , 1999, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[23]  Gilbert A. Churchill,et al.  Improving the measurement of service quality , 1993 .

[24]  William R. King,et al.  An empirical study of the impacts of integrating business planning and information systems planning , 1999 .

[25]  Richard J. Holden,et al.  The Technology Acceptance Model: Its past and its future in health care , 2010, J. Biomed. Informatics.

[26]  Makoto Takizawa,et al.  Future Data and Security Engineering , 2014, Lecture Notes in Computer Science.

[27]  Carol Stoak Saunders,et al.  Measuring Performance of the Information Systems Function , 1992, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[28]  William J. Kettinger,et al.  Perceived Service Quality and User Satisfaction with the Information Services Function , 1994 .

[29]  Blake Ives,et al.  Executive Involvement and Participation in the Management of Information Technology , 1991, MIS Q..

[30]  James C. Wetherbe,et al.  Key Issues in Information Systems Management: 1994-95 SIM Delphi Results , 1996, MIS Q..

[31]  Peter G. W. Keen,et al.  Information systems and organizational change , 1990, CACM.

[32]  Sammy W. Pearson,et al.  Development of a Tool for Measuring and Analyzing Computer User Satisfaction , 1983 .