Personal digital assistants as cognitive aids for individuals with severe traumatic brain injury: A community-based trial

Objective: The purpose of this study was to examine the efficacy of personal digital assistants (PDAs) as cognitive aids in a sample of individuals with severe traumatic brain injury (TBI). Method: The group included 23 community-dwelling individuals at least 1 year post-severe TBI, who had difficulties in performing everyday tasks due to behavioural memory problems. Participants were trained by an occupational therapist to use PDAs as cognitive aids and assessed for occupational performance (using Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM)) and participation in everyday life tasks (using Craig Handicap Assessment and Rating Technique–Revised (CHART)) before training and 8 weeks after training concluded. Results: Statistically significant improvement was noted for self-ratings of occupational performance and satisfaction with occupational performance (COPM); significant improvement in a self-rating of participation was noted (CHART-R). Conclusion: A brief training intervention utilizing PDAs as cognitive aids is associated with improved self-ratings of performance in everyday life tasks among community-dwelling individuals with severe TBI.

[1]  G M Giles,et al.  The effectiveness of an electronic memory aid for a memory-impaired adult of normal intelligence. , 1989, The American journal of occupational therapy : official publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association.

[2]  Steven E. Stock,et al.  Enhancing Independent Task Performance for Individuals with Mental Retardation through Use of a Handheld Self-Directed Visual and Audio Prompting System. , 2002 .

[3]  D. Cifu,et al.  Acute predictors of successful return to work 1 year after traumatic brain injury: a multicenter analysis. , 1997, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[4]  Treatment and rehabilitation of mild and moderate head trauma. , 1986 .

[5]  Thomas D. Williams,et al.  The visions system , 1975, SGAR.

[6]  C. Boake,et al.  Prediction of employment outcome one to three years following traumatic brain injury (TBI). , 1998, Brain injury.

[7]  The essential steps cognitive orthotic. , 2003, NeuroRehabilitation.

[8]  L. Tooth,et al.  Patterns of community integration 2-5 years post-discharge from brain injury rehabilitation. , 2001, Brain injury.

[9]  Experimental aging research. , 2010, Experimental aging research.

[10]  Alan D. Baddeley,et al.  The Rivermead Behavioural Memory Test - Extended Version , 1999 .

[11]  P J Donovick,et al.  Traumatic brain injury (TBI) 10-20 years later: a comprehensive outcome study of psychiatric symptomatology, cognitive abilities and psychosocial functioning. , 2001, Brain injury.

[12]  P. Gorman,et al.  Effectiveness of the ISAAC cognitive prosthetic system for improving rehabilitation outcomes with neurofunctional impairment. , 2003, NeuroRehabilitation.

[13]  J. Evans,et al.  Reducing everyday memory and planning problems by means of a paging system: a randomised control crossover study , 2001, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[14]  M. Rosenthal,et al.  A Multicenter Longitudinal Investigation of Return to Work and Community Integration Following Traumatic Brain Injury , 1996 .

[15]  D. Chute,et al.  ProsthesisWare: concepts and caveats for microcomputer-based aids to everyday living. , 1994, Experimental aging research.

[16]  J. Barbenel,et al.  The efficacy of an intelligent cognitive orthosis to facilitate handwashing by persons with moderate to severe dementia , 2004 .

[17]  Barbara A Wilson,et al.  Preliminary report of a NeuroPage service within a health care system. , 2003, NeuroRehabilitation.

[18]  T. Wade,et al.  Mobile phones as a new memory aid: a preliminary investigation using case studies. , 2001, Brain injury.

[19]  J. Whyte,et al.  Use of a Portable Voice Organizer to Remember Therapy Goals in Traumatic Brain Injury Rehabilitation: A Within-Subjects Trial , 2002, The Journal of head trauma rehabilitation.

[20]  Richard Levinson,et al.  The Planning and Execution Assistant and Trainer (peat) , 1997 .

[21]  N. Kirsch,et al.  A generic, ‘in-house’, alphanumeric paging system for prospective activity impairments after traumatic brain injury , 2004, Brain injury.

[22]  H. Emslie,et al.  Comparison of pocket-computer memory aids for people with brain injury. , 2001, Brain injury.

[23]  M. D. van den Broek,et al.  Evaluation of an electronic memory aid in the neuropsychological rehabilitation of prospective memory deficits. , 2000, Brain injury.

[24]  H. J. Kim,et al.  Electronic memory aids for outpatient brain injury: follow-up findings. , 2000, Brain injury.

[25]  L R Salmi,et al.  Prevalence of impairments 5 years after a head injury, and their relationship with disabilities and outcome. , 1996, Brain injury.

[26]  H. J. Kim,et al.  Utility of a microcomputer as an external memory aid for a memory-impaired head injury patient during in-patient rehabilitation. , 1999, Brain injury.

[27]  B. Wilson.  Cognitive rehabilitation, an integrative neuropsychological approach , 2002 .

[28]  H. Emslie,et al.  Evaluation of NeuroPage: a new memory aid , 1997, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[29]  Steven E. Stock,et al.  Enhancing independent time-management skills of individuals with mental retardation using a Palmtop personal computer. , 2002, Mental retardation.

[30]  A. Baddeley,et al.  The development and validation of a test battery for detecting and monitoring everyday memory problems. , 1989, Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology.