Development of a Core Clinical Dataset to Characterize Serious Illness, Injuries, and Resource Requirements for Acute Medical Responses to Public Health Emergencies

Objectives: In developed countries, public health systems have become adept at rapidly identifying the etiology and impact of public health emergencies. However, within the time course of clinical responses, shortfalls in readily analyzable patient-level data limit capabilities to understand clinical course, predict outcomes, ensure resource availability, and evaluate the effectiveness of diagnostic and therapeutic strategies for seriously ill and injured patients. To be useful in the timeline of a public health emergency, multi-institutional clinical investigation systems must be in place to rapidly collect, analyze, and disseminate detailed clinical information regarding patients across prehospital, emergency department, and acute care hospital settings, including ICUs. As an initial step to near real-time clinical learning during public health emergencies, we sought to develop an “all-hazards” core dataset to characterize serious illness and injuries and the resource requirements for acute medical response across the care continuum. Subjects: A multidisciplinary panel of clinicians, public health professionals, and researchers with expertise in public health emergencies. Design: Group consensus process. Interventions: The consensus process included regularly scheduled conference calls, electronic communications, and an in-person meeting to generate candidate variables. Candidate variables were then reviewed by the group to meet the competing criteria of utility and feasibility resulting in the core dataset. Measurements and Main Results: The 40-member panel generated 215 candidate variables for potential dataset inclusion. The final dataset includes 140 patient-level variables in the domains of demographics and anthropometrics (7), prehospital (11), emergency department (13), diagnosis (8), severity of illness (54), medications and interventions (38), and outcomes (9). Conclusions: The resulting all-hazard core dataset for seriously ill and injured persons provides a foundation to facilitate rapid collection, analyses, and dissemination of information necessary for clinicians, public health officials, and policymakers to optimize public health emergency response. Further work is needed to validate the effectiveness of the dataset in a variety of emergency settings.

[1]  D. Buckeridge,et al.  Systematic Review: Surveillance Systems for Early Detection of Bioterrorism-Related Diseases , 2004, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[2]  E. Draper,et al.  APACHE II: A severity of disease classification system , 1985, Critical care medicine.

[3]  R. Brook,et al.  Consensus methods: characteristics and guidelines for use. , 1984, American journal of public health.

[4]  Michael Klompas,et al.  Uses of electronic health records for public health surveillance to advance public health. , 2015, Annual review of public health.

[5]  David M. Hartley,et al.  Syndromic Surveillance and Bioterrorism-related Epidemics , 2003, Emerging infectious diseases.

[6]  William B. Lober,et al.  Review Paper: Implementing Syndromic Surveillance: A Practical Guide Informed by the Early Experience , 2003, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[7]  Mikaela Keller,et al.  Automated vocabulary discovery for geo-parsing online epidemic intelligence , 2009, BMC Bioinformatics.

[8]  Vital signs: central line-associated blood stream infections--United States, 2001, 2008, and 2009. , 2011, MMWR. Morbidity and mortality weekly report.

[9]  J. Vincent,et al.  The SOFA (Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment) score to describe organ dysfunction/failure , 1996, Intensive Care Medicine.

[10]  C. Cairns,et al.  Computer-facilitated review of electronic medical records reliably identifies emergency department interventions in older adults. , 2013, Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine.

[11]  Landon Fridman Detwiler,et al.  Visualization and analytics tools for infectious disease epidemiology: A systematic review , 2014, J. Biomed. Informatics.

[12]  Stephanie W. Haas,et al.  Integration of Syndromic Surveillance Data into Public Health Practice at State and Local Levels in North Carolina , 2012, Public health reports.

[13]  C. Webb,et al.  The Delphi technique: a methodological discussion. , 1994, Journal of advanced nursing.

[14]  J. Brownstein,et al.  Influenza A (H1N1) virus, 2009--online monitoring. , 2009, The New England journal of medicine.

[15]  P. Pronovost,et al.  Open Access Study Protocol: the Improving Care of Acute Lung Injury Patients (icap) Study , 2005 .

[16]  Robert A. Jenders,et al.  A systematic literature review of automated clinical coding and classification systems , 2010, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[17]  Russell R. Miller,et al.  Critical illness from 2009 pandemic influenza A virus and bacterial coinfection in the United States* , 2012, Critical care medicine.

[18]  G. Martin,et al.  Navigating the Institutional Review Board Approval Process in a Multicenter Observational Critical Care Study* , 2014, Critical care medicine.

[19]  A. Randolph,et al.  Critically Ill Children During the 2009–2010 Influenza Pandemic in the United States , 2011, Pediatrics.

[20]  Francis Collins,et al.  Research as a part of public health emergency response. , 2013, The New England journal of medicine.

[21]  W. Haddon,et al.  The injury severity score: a method for describing patients with multiple injuries and evaluating emergency care. , 1974, The Journal of trauma.

[22]  D. Annane,et al.  InFACT: a global critical care research response to H1N1 , 2010, The Lancet.

[23]  Samuel M. Brown,et al.  Structure, Process, and Annual ICU Mortality Across 69 Centers: United States Critical Illness and Injury Trials Group Critical Illness Outcomes Study* , 2014, Critical care medicine.

[24]  Lucila Ohno-Machado,et al.  Natural language processing: algorithms and tools to extract computable information from EHRs and from the biomedical literature , 2013, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[25]  D. Cook,et al.  A Canadian Critical Care Trials Group project in collaboration with the international forum for acute care trialists - Collaborative H1N1 Adjuvant Treatment pilot trial (CHAT): study protocol and design of a randomized controlled trial , 2011, Trials.

[26]  Thomas E Stewart,et al.  Development of a clinical definition for acute respiratory distress syndrome using the Delphi technique. , 2005, Journal of critical care.

[27]  C. Callaway,et al.  The Resuscitation Outcomes Consortium Epistry-Trauma: design, development, and implementation of a North American epidemiologic prehospital trauma registry. , 2008, Resuscitation.

[28]  F. Shann,et al.  PIM2: a revised version of the Paediatric Index of Mortality , 2003, Intensive Care Medicine.

[29]  William W O'Neill,et al.  Rapid medical relief--Project Medishare and the Haitian earthquake. , 2010, The New England journal of medicine.

[30]  Stéfan Jacques Darmoni,et al.  Evaluation of syndromic algorithms for detecting patients with potentially transmissible infectious diseases based on computerised emergency-department data , 2013, BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making.

[31]  W. Sibbald,et al.  Consensus conferences in critical care medicine. Methodologies and impact. , 1997, Critical care clinics.

[32]  O. Sibony,et al.  Using and Reporting the Delphi Method for Selecting Healthcare Quality Indicators: A Systematic Review , 2011, PloS one.

[33]  Stephanie W. Haas,et al.  Implementation of Emergency Medical Text Classifier for Syndromic Surveillance , 2013, AMIA.

[34]  J. Hadler,et al.  Mortality among survivors of the Sept 11, 2001, World Trade Center disaster: results from the World Trade Center Health Registry cohort , 2011, The Lancet.

[35]  C. Sprung,et al.  Early observational research and registries during the 2009–2010 influenza A pandemic , 2010, Critical care medicine.