University-Industry Collaboration and Technology Transfer in Hong Kong and Knowledge-based Economic Growth

The twenty-first century is the century of knowledge-based international economic competition. More than ever, the prosperity of nations depends on the ability of public and private institutions, policies, managers, and workers to mobilize and exploit knowledge-intensive capabilities and assets. Although natural resources play an important role in economic competitiveness, the ability of even resource-rich economies to raise and sustain their citizens’ living standards depends on their ability to exploit the created resources of knowledge and human capital.

[1]  David C. Mowery,et al.  Patenting and Licensing University Inventions: Lessons from the History of the Research Corporation , 2001 .

[2]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  ABSORPTIVE CAPACITY: A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON LEARNING AND INNOVATION , 1990 .

[3]  A. Hughes Innovation Policy as Cargo Cult: Myth and Reality in Knowledge-Led Productivity Growth , 2010 .

[4]  Edwin Mansfield,et al.  Academic research and industrial innovation , 1991 .

[5]  Kimberly S. Hamilton,et al.  The changing composition of innovative activity in the US -- a portrait based on patent analysis , 2001 .

[6]  M. Heller,et al.  Can Patents Deter Innovation , 1998 .

[7]  Partha Dasgupta,et al.  Creation and Transfer of Knowledge , 1998 .

[8]  David C. Mowery,et al.  Learning to Patent: Institutional Experience, Learning, and the Characteristics of U.S. University Patents After the Bayh-Dole Act, 1981-1992 , 2002 .

[9]  Richard K. Lester,et al.  Made by Hong Kong , 1997 .

[10]  B. Zorina Khan,et al.  Ivory Tower and Industrial Innovation: University-Industry Technology Transfer Before and After the Bayh-Dole Act. By David C. Mowery, Richard R. Nelson, Bhaven N. Sampat and Arvids A. Ziedonis. Stanford, CA: Stanford Business Books, 2004. Pp. xiv, 241. $39.95. , 2004, The Journal of Economic History.

[11]  Timothy F. Bresnahan,et al.  Building High-Tech Clusters , 2004 .

[12]  M. Trajtenberg,et al.  University Versus Corporate Patents: A Window On The Basicness Of Invention , 1997 .

[13]  Rebecca S. Eisenberg,et al.  Public Research and Private Development: Patents and Technology Transfer in Government-Sponsored Research , 1996 .

[14]  S. Winter,et al.  Appropriating the Returns from Industrial Research and Development , 1987 .

[15]  Scott Shane,et al.  Why do some universities generate more start-ups than others? , 2003 .

[16]  Rebecca S. Lowen Making Silicon Valley: Innovation and the Growth of High Tech, 1930 1970. By Christophe L cuyer. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 2006. Pp. vii, 393. $40 , 2006 .

[17]  Henry Etzkowitz,et al.  Knowledge as property: The Massachusetts Institute of technology and the debate over academic patent policy , 1994 .

[18]  R. Nelson,et al.  American Universities and Technical Advance in Industry , 1994 .

[19]  Kimberly S. Hamilton,et al.  The increasing linkage between U.S. technology and public science , 1997 .

[20]  D. Mowery,et al.  The Bayh-Dole Act of 1980 and University–Industry Technology Transfer: A Model for Other OECD Governments? , 2004 .

[21]  Arvids A. Ziedonis,et al.  Changes in university patent quality after the Bayh-Dole act: a re-examination , 2003 .

[22]  Timothy F. Bresnahan,et al.  Building High-Tech Clusters: Old-Economy Inputs for New-Economy Outcomes , 2004 .

[23]  Steven Klepper,et al.  Entrepreneurship, Growth, and Public Policy: Silicon Valley, a Chip off the Old Detroit Bloc , 2009 .

[24]  M. Heller,et al.  Can Patents Deter Innovation? The Anticommons in Biomedical Research , 1998, Science.

[25]  Naubahar Sharif,et al.  Mobilizing Technology Transfer from University to Industry: The Experience of Hong Kong Universities , 2007 .

[26]  Gustavo Crespi,et al.  Labour Mobility of Academic Inventors: Career Decision and Knowledge Transfer , 2006 .

[27]  Byron E. Shafer Is America different? : a new look at American exceptionalism , 1991 .

[28]  Rosemarie H. Ziedonis,et al.  Reprinted Article The patent paradox revisited: an empirical study of patenting in the U.S. semiconductor industry, 1979–1995 , 2009 .

[29]  Roger L. Geiger,et al.  Research and Relevant Knowledge: American Research Universities since World War II , 1994 .

[30]  David C. Mowery,et al.  Ivory tower and industrial innovation : university-industry technology transfer before and after the Bayh-Dole Act in the United States , 2004 .

[31]  Magnus Henrekson,et al.  Bottom-Up vs. Top-Down Policies Towards the Commercialization of University Intellectual Property , 2003 .

[32]  M. Deutsch Cooperation and competition , 2011, The International Encyclopedia of Biological Anthropology.

[33]  M. Trajtenberg,et al.  University Patenting Amid Changing Incentives for Commercialization , 1998 .

[34]  R. H. Keniston,et al.  AN ASSOCIATION OF AMERICAN UNIVERSITIES. , 1900, Science.

[35]  Roger L. Geiger,et al.  To Advance Knowledge: The Growth of American Research Universities, 1900–1940 by Roger L. Geiger (review) , 1986, Technology and Culture.

[36]  M. Trajtenberg,et al.  Universities as a Source of Commercial Technology: A Detailed Analysis of University Patenting, 19651988 , 1995, Review of Economics and Statistics.

[37]  Magnus Gulbrandsen,et al.  University-industry relations in Norway , 2007 .

[38]  Arvids A. Ziedonis,et al.  The growth of patenting and licensing by U.S. universities: an assessment of the effects of the Bayh–Dole act of 1980 , 2001 .

[39]  Roberto Mazzoleni,et al.  How Do University Inventions Get into Practice ? , 2000 .