Evaluation of Different Scenarios to Switch the Whole Regional Bus Fleet of an Italian Alpine Region to Zero-Emission Buses

Public bus decarbonization is increasingly important to address the global issue of climate change. There are several challenges associated with large-scale introduction of zero-emission technologies in public fleets. This is especially the case in an extra-urban context, of mountain regions with challenging weather conditions. In this work the analysis of the state-of-the-art ZEBs, local bus lines, and timetables was performed to understand the best fit of technology—battery electric buses (BEBs) or fuel cell electric buses (FCEBs)—for each line in such a region. Further, a simulation tool was developed to calculate the compatibility of zero-emission technologies with the current needs of the public transportation considering distance, altitude difference, and climate conditions. The results show that a complete switch of the fleet is possible with a slight increase in the number of buses and that there is no clear difference in the distance covered in mountainous areas by BEBs versus FCEBs, but that both technologies can cover similar distances. The tool developed is not limited to bus fleets but can be applied to all kinds of fleets that cover clearly defined daily routes.

[1]  Zhijia Tan,et al.  Balancing the GHG emissions and operational costs for a mixed fleet of electric buses and diesel buses , 2022, Applied Energy.

[2]  Q. Meng,et al.  Electric Bus Charging Scheduling for a Single Public Transport Route Considering Nonlinear Charging Profile and Battery Degradation Effect , 2022, Transportation Research Part B: Methodological.

[3]  M. Salicrú,et al.  Charging operations in battery electric bus systems considering fleet size variability along the service , 2022, Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies.

[4]  P. Muñoz,et al.  Comparative analysis of cost, emissions and fuel consumption of diesel, natural gas, electric and hydrogen urban buses , 2022, Energy Conversion and Management.

[5]  C. Mullen,et al.  Electric buses in England and Sweden – Overcoming barriers to introduction , 2022, Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment.

[6]  Camila Balbontin,et al.  Comparative assessment of zero emission electric and hydrogen buses in Australia , 2022, Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment.

[7]  G. Papa,et al.  Electric-bus routes in hilly urban areas: Overview and challenges , 2022, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews.

[8]  J. Nelson,et al.  Electric and hydrogen buses: Shifting from conventionally fuelled cars in the UK , 2020 .

[9]  Nader A. El-Taweel,et al.  Integrated Utility-Transit Model for Optimal Configuration of Battery Electric Bus Systems , 2020, IEEE Systems Journal.

[10]  G. Correa,et al.  A comparative energy and environmental analysis of a diesel, hybrid, hydrogen and electric urban bus , 2019, Energy.

[11]  Ran Wei,et al.  Optimizing the spatio-temporal deployment of battery electric bus system , 2018 .

[12]  D. Goehlich,et al.  Electrification of a city bus network—An optimization model for cost-effective placing of charging infrastructure and battery sizing of fast-charging electric bus systems , 2017 .

[13]  Mark Ferguson,et al.  Simulation of electric buses on a full transit network: Operational feasibility and grid impact analysis , 2017 .

[14]  Mark Ferguson,et al.  Electric buses: A review of alternative powertrains , 2016 .

[15]  P. Ekins,et al.  Hydrogen and fuel cell technologies for heating: A review , 2015 .

[16]  Dietmar Göhlich,et al.  Technology assessment of an electric urban bus system for Berlin , 2014 .

[17]  Winai Chanpeng,et al.  Design of Efficient In-Wheel Motor for Electric Vehicles☆ , 2014 .