A combined field and laboratory investigation for the effective application of ergonomics in situ.

Despite extensive research on musculoskeletal disorders associated with manual labour, the enormity of the problems experienced in industry remains. Recognizing the importance of applying the science of ergonomics, the focus of this paper was to highlight the substantial difference between conducting rigorous controlled research in the laboratory and the less controlled, but more realistic research within the working environment. Our proposal is not to use one or the other methodology, but rather to combine basic assessments made in situ with rigorous laboratory experimentation investigating human responses both pre- and post-intervention, and finally to go back into the field to test the efficacy of the proposed ergonomics intervention. The combined 'field-lab-field' format presented in this paper is based on research conducted in an industrially developing country, and it is argued that this is the most likely means of assuring that the application of rigorous ergonomics theory will improve the poor working conditions so evident in developing regions.

[1]  Gary A. Mirka,et al.  Accuracy of a three-dimensional lumbar motion monitor for recording dynamic trunk motion characteristics , 1992 .

[2]  David Meister,et al.  Theoretical issues in general and developmental ergonomics , 2000 .

[3]  Anil Mital,et al.  A comparison of literature-based design recommendations and experimental capability data for a complex manual materials handling activity , 1999 .

[4]  W S Marras,et al.  The effectiveness of commonly used lifting assessment methods to identify industrial jobs associated with elevated risk of low-back disorders. , 1999, Ergonomics.

[5]  David J. Oborne,et al.  Ergonomics at work , 1982 .

[6]  D M Zalk,et al.  Grassroots ergonomics: initiating an ergonomics program utilizing participatory techniques. , 2001, The Annals of occupational hygiene.

[7]  A Garg,et al.  Revised NIOSH equation for the design and evaluation of manual lifting tasks. , 1993, Ergonomics.

[8]  W S Marras,et al.  Measuring trunk motions in industry: variability due to task factors, individual differences, and the amount of data collected , 2000, Ergonomics.

[9]  W S Marras,et al.  Biomechanical risk factors for occupationally related low back disorders. , 1995, Ergonomics.

[10]  R. H. Westgaard,et al.  Ergonomic intervention research for improved musculoskeletal health: A critical review , 1997 .

[11]  H Shahnavaz,et al.  The promises and problems of ergonomics application in the People's Republic of China. , 1989, Applied ergonomics.

[12]  G. Borg.  Psychophysical bases of perceived exertion. , 1982, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[13]  N. Buis.  Ergonomics, legislation and productivity in manual materials handling , 1990 .

[14]  W. Marras.  Occupational low back disorder causation and control , 2000, Ergonomics.

[15]  Desmond O'neill,et al.  The promotion of ergonomics in industrially developing countries , 2005 .

[16]  A Mital,et al.  Maximum Acceptable Weight of Lift as a Function of Material Density, Center of Gravity Location, Hand Preference, and Frequency , 1983, Human factors.

[17]  C. J. Christie,et al.  An indirect method to assess the energy expenditure of manual labourers in situ , 2004 .

[18]  M M Ayoub,et al.  Psychophysical modelling for combined manual materials-handling activities. , 1986, Ergonomics.