The Role of Serum Calprotectin in Defining Disease Outcomes in Non-Systemic Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis: A Pilot Study

Serum calprotectin (MRP8/14) is currently being studied as a promising biomarker of disease activity and outcome in patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) but the data in the literature are conflicting. The aim of our study was to investigate the potential role of serum calprotectin as biomarker of disease activity and flare/remission in a group of nsJIA patients during a follow-up period of 18 months. In this prospective longitudinal study, two groups of patients with ns-JIA (55 active patients and 56 patients in remission according to Wallace’s criteria) and a control group (50 children) were recruited at baseline from January 2020 to September 2021. JIA patients were followed for up to 18 months at four timepoints: 3 months (T1), 6 months (T2), 12 months (T3) and 18 months (T4). At each timepoint, the following were recorded: JADAS27, blood counts, ESR, CRP, albumin, ferritin and serum calprotectin. To illustrate the performance of calprotectin, Kaplan–Meier curves were constructed from baseline to relapse/remission, dichotomizing patients at baseline in positive/negative on the basis progressive calprotectin cut-offs. Associations between baseline factors and relapse were determined using Cox regression models. Multivariate models were constructed to analyze the effect of covariates. Comparing baseline clinical and laboratory data of the three groups (active vs. inactive JIA vs. controls), only serum calprotectin reached statistical significance (active patients vs. inactive (p = 0.0016) and vs. controls (p = 0.0012)). In the inactive group, during the 18 months of follow up, 31 patients (55.3%) had a relapse. Comparing the baseline data of relapsers vs. non-relapsers, serum calprotectin showed higher levels (p = 0.001) in relapsers. In survival analysis, a log rank test showed significant differences of up to 12 ng/mL (p = 0.045). Multivariate Cox regression confirmed that only baseline calprotectin levels were independently associated with disease recurrence. In the active group, in the 12 months of follow-up, 19 patients (38%) entered remission of the disease. In addition, in this group, the only statistical difference at the baseline was the value of MPR8/14 (p = 0.0001). Log rank test showed significant differences up to 10 ng/mL (p = 0.003). In the multivariate Cox regression, serum calprotectin levels at baseline were independently associated with remission. In conclusion, our study would suggest a dual role for calprotectin in predicting future relapse and treatment response in patients with nsJIA, thus influencing therapeutic decisions and management of these patients during follow up.

[1]  G. Farello,et al.  Serum Calprotectin a Potential Biomarker in Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis: A Meta-Analysis , 2021, Journal of clinical medicine.

[2]  M. Mahler,et al.  Serum calprotectin (S100A8/9), clinical and ultrasound assessment in patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis. , 2021, Clinical and experimental rheumatology.

[3]  M. Hall-Craggs,et al.  Biomarkers of Response to Biologic Therapy in Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis , 2021, Frontiers in Pharmacology.

[4]  P. Durez,et al.  Serum calprotectin (S100A8/A9): a promising biomarker in diagnosis and follow-up in different subgroups of juvenile idiopathic arthritis , 2021, RMD Open.

[5]  B. Acar,et al.  Prediction of inactive disease and relapse in oligoarticular juvenile idiopathic arthritis , 2020, Modern rheumatology.

[6]  W. Thomson,et al.  Frequency of biologic switching and the outcomes of switching in children and young people with juvenile idiopathic arthritis: a national cohort study , 2020, The Lancet Rheumatology.

[7]  M. Schilham,et al.  MRP8/14 and neutrophil elastase for predicting treatment response and occurrence of flare in patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis , 2020, Rheumatology.

[8]  L. Wedderburn,et al.  Predicting disease outcomes in juvenile idiopathic arthritis: challenges, evidence, and new directions. , 2019, The Lancet. Child & adolescent health.

[9]  A. Pistorio,et al.  Predictors of Effectiveness of Anakinra in Systemic Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis , 2019, The Journal of Rheumatology.

[10]  D. Foell,et al.  Serum S100A8/A9 and S100A12 Levels in Children With Polyarticular Forms of Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis: Relationship to Maintenance of Clinically Inactive Disease During Anti–Tumor Necrosis Factor Therapy and Occurrence of Disease Flare After Discontinuation of Therapy , 2019, Arthritis & rheumatology.

[11]  J. Yagüe,et al.  Calprotectin strongly and independently predicts relapse in rheumatoid arthritis and polyarticular psoriatic arthritis patients treated with tumor necrosis factor inhibitors: a 1-year prospective cohort study , 2018, Arthritis Research & Therapy.

[12]  D. Foell,et al.  Treating juvenile idiopathic arthritis to target: recommendations of an international task force , 2018, Annals of the rheumatic diseases.

[13]  F. Chiarelli,et al.  Clinical characteristics of juvenile idiopathic arthritis in an area of central Italy: a population-based study. , 2017, Annali di igiene : medicina preventiva e di comunita.

[14]  E. Alexeeva,et al.  Predictors of the response to etanercept in patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis without systemic manifestations within 12 months: results of an open-label, prospective study conducted at the National Scientific and Practical Center of Children's Health, Russia , 2017, Pediatric Rheumatology.

[15]  J. Branco,et al.  Effectiveness and long-term retention of anti-tumour necrosis factor treatment in juvenile and adult patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis: data from Reuma.pt. , 2016, Rheumatology.

[16]  A. Omenetti,et al.  From bench to bedside and back again: translational research in autoinflammation , 2015, Nature Reviews Rheumatology.

[17]  H. Mann,et al.  Serum calprotectin (S100A8/9): an independent predictor of ultrasound synovitis in patients with rheumatoid arthritis , 2015, Arthritis Research & Therapy.

[18]  D. Foell,et al.  MRP8/14 serum levels as a predictor of response to starting and stopping anti-TNF treatment in juvenile idiopathic arthritis , 2015, Arthritis Research & Therapy.

[19]  A. Martini,et al.  Advances in biomarkers for paediatric rheumatic diseases , 2015, Nature Reviews Rheumatology.

[20]  D. Foell,et al.  Management of juvenile idiopathic arthritis: hitting the target , 2015, Nature Reviews Rheumatology.

[21]  J. Hardouin,et al.  Identification of S100A9 as Biomarker of Responsiveness to the Methotrexate/Etanercept Combination in Rheumatoid Arthritis Using a Proteomic Approach , 2014, PloS one.

[22]  I. Becker,et al.  Predictors of response to methotrexate in juvenile idiopathic arthritis , 2014, Pediatric Rheumatology.

[23]  I. Becker,et al.  Predictors of response to etanercept in polyarticular-course juvenile idiopathic arthritis. , 2014, Rheumatology.

[24]  J. Gerss,et al.  Validation of Relapse Risk Biomarkers for Routine Use in Patients With Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis , 2014, Arthritis care & research.

[25]  E. Haddad,et al.  The outcomes of juvenile idiopathic arthritis in children managed with contemporary treatments: results from the ReACCh-Out cohort , 2014, Annals of the rheumatic diseases.

[26]  Francis Guillemin,et al.  Prevalence and incidence of juvenile idiopathic arthritis: a systematic review. , 2014, Joint, bone, spine : revue du rhumatisme.

[27]  Y. Berkun,et al.  Diagnosis and classification of juvenile idiopathic arthritis. , 2014, Journal of autoimmunity.

[28]  A. Ravelli,et al.  Introducing new tools for assessment of parent- and child-reported outcomes in paediatric rheumatology practice: a work in progress. , 2013, Clinical and experimental rheumatology.

[29]  L. Wedderburn,et al.  A subgroup of juvenile idiopathic arthritis patients who respond well to methotrexate are identified by the serum biomarker MRP8/14 protein. , 2013, Rheumatology.

[30]  D. Foell,et al.  Phagocyte-derived S100 proteins in autoinflammation: putative role in pathogenesis and usefulness as biomarkers. , 2013, Clinical immunology.

[31]  A. Martini,et al.  Seeking insights into the EPidemiology, treatment and Outcome of Childhood Arthritis through a multinational collaborative effort: Introduction of the EPOCA study , 2012, Pediatric Rheumatology.

[32]  A. Martini,et al.  Remission, minimal disease activity, and acceptable symptom state in juvenile idiopathic arthritis: defining criteria based on the juvenile arthritis disease activity score. , 2012, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[33]  A. Martini,et al.  Toward a treat-to-target approach in the management of juvenile idiopathic arthritis. , 2012, Clinical and experimental rheumatology.

[34]  J. Gerss,et al.  Phagocyte-specific S100 proteins and high-sensitivity C reactive protein as biomarkers for a risk-adapted treatment to maintain remission in juvenile idiopathic arthritis: a comparative study , 2012, Annals of the rheumatic diseases.

[35]  Bin Huang,et al.  American College of Rheumatology provisional criteria for defining clinical inactive disease in select categories of juvenile idiopathic arthritis , 2011, Arthritis care & research.

[36]  S. Albani,et al.  Juvenile idiopathic arthritis , 2011, The Lancet.

[37]  J. Gerss,et al.  Methotrexate withdrawal at 6 vs 12 months in juvenile idiopathic arthritis in remission: a randomized clinical trial. , 2010, JAMA.

[38]  Arne Skerra,et al.  The crystal structure of the human (S100A8/S100A9)2 heterotetramer, calprotectin, illustrates how conformational changes of interacting alpha-helices can determine specific association of two EF-hand proteins. , 2007, Journal of molecular biology.

[39]  E. Spada,et al.  Italian cross-sectional growth charts for height, weight and BMI (2 to 20 yr) , 2006, Journal of endocrinological investigation.

[40]  D. Foell,et al.  Myeloid-related proteins 8 and 14 induce a specific inflammatory response in human microvascular endothelial cells. , 2005, Blood.

[41]  B Henderson,et al.  TNF-α neutralization in cytokine-driven diseases: a mathematical model to account for therapeutic success in rheumatoid arthritis but therapeutic failure in systemic inflammatory response syndrome , 2005 .

[42]  M. Frosch,et al.  Myeloid related proteins MRP8/MRP14 may predict disease flares in juvenile idiopathic arthritis. , 2004, Clinical and experimental rheumatology.

[43]  M. Suarez‐Almazor,et al.  International League of Associations for Rheumatology: International League of Associations for Rheumatology classification of juvenile idiopathic arthritis: second revision, Edmonton, 2001 , 2004 .

[44]  D. Foell,et al.  Methotrexate treatment in juvenile idiopathic arthritis: when is the right time to stop? , 2004, Annals of the rheumatic diseases.

[45]  C. Heizmann,et al.  S100 proteins: structure, functions and pathology. , 2002, Frontiers in bioscience : a journal and virtual library.

[46]  N. Wulffraat,et al.  Myeloid-related proteins 8 and 14 are specifically secreted during interaction of phagocytes and activated endothelium and are useful markers for monitoring disease activity in pauciarticular-onset juvenile rheumatoid arthritis. , 2000, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[47]  A. Martini,et al.  Correlation between conventional disease activity measures in juvenile chronic arthritis , 1997, Annals of the rheumatic diseases.

[48]  F. Chiarelli,et al.  Serum calprotectin: review of its usefulness and validity in paediatric rheumatic diseases. , 2015, Clinical and experimental rheumatology.