The verbiage in variable message signs and traffic diversion during crash incidents

Purpose WIth limited research on the effects of variable message sign (VMS) message content and verbiage on revealed driver behavior, this study aims to investigate how different verbiage of crash-related messages are related to the diversion rate. Design/methodology/approach Using ordered logit models, the associations of message verbiage with diversion rates during crash incidents were assessed using five years of VMS message history within a section of I-15 in the state of Utah. Findings A significant impact of message verbiage on the diversion rate was observed. Based on the analysis results, the crash message verbiage with the highest diversion was found to be miles to crash + “prepare to stop,” followed by crash location + delay information, miles to crash + “use caution” + lane of the crash, etc. In addition, the diversion rate was found to be correlated to some roadway characteristics (e.g. occupancy in mainline, weather condition and light condition) along with the temporal variations. Research limitations/implications These findings could be used by transportation agencies (e.g. state department of transportation [DOTs]) to make informed decisions about choosing the message verbiage during future crash incidents. This study also revealed that higher diversion rates are associated with a shorter distance between the crash location and VMS device location, recommending increasing the number of VMS devices, particularly in crash-prone areas.

[1]  Kai Li Lim,et al.  State of data platforms for connected vehicles and infrastructures , 2021, Communications in Transportation Research.

[2]  Franco Basso,et al.  A vehicle-by-vehicle approach to assess the impact of variable message signs on driving behavior , 2021 .

[3]  Shengchuan Zhao,et al.  Modeling Travelers’ Acceptance of Variable Message Signs: A Hierarchical Hybrid Choice Model , 2020 .

[4]  Guowei Zhang,et al.  A stochastic programming approach for heterogeneous variable message sign location problem for freeway networks , 2020, Transportmetrica A: Transport Science.

[5]  Jian Rong,et al.  A driving simulation study to investigate the information threshold of graphical variable message signs based on visual perception characteristics of drivers , 2020 .

[6]  Guangchuan Yang,et al.  Integrated Empirical Analysis of the Effect of Variable Message Sign on Driver Route Choice Behavior , 2020 .

[7]  Snehanshu Banerjee,et al.  Comprehensive Analysis of Dynamic Message Sign Impact on Driver Behavior: A Random Forest Approach , 2019, Urban Science.

[8]  Gary E. Burnett,et al.  Journey decision making: the influence on drivers of dynamic information presented on variable message signs , 2016, Cognition, Technology & Work.

[9]  Constantinos Antoniou,et al.  Determinants of driver response to variable message sign information in Athens , 2015 .

[10]  Xin Ye,et al.  Whether to enter expressway or not? The impact of new variable message sign information , 2015 .

[11]  Adib Kanafani,et al.  Evaluation of the effectiveness of accident information on freeway changeable message signs: A comparison of empirical methodologies , 2014 .

[12]  Chunfu Shao,et al.  Driver response to information provided by variable message signs in Beijing , 2014 .

[13]  Richard Tay,et al.  Effects of variable message sign on driver detours and identification of influencing factors , 2014 .

[14]  Nedal T. Ratrout,et al.  Effectiveness of Newly Introduced Variable Message Signs in Al-Khobar, Saudi Arabia , 2014 .

[15]  Xin Ye,et al.  Investigation of drivers' diversion responses to urban freeway variable message signs displaying freeway and local street travel times , 2013 .

[16]  Yasuo Asakura,et al.  Effects of Traffic Incident Information on Drivers’ Route Choice Behaviour in Urban Expressway Network , 2012 .

[17]  Lijun Sun,et al.  Empirical Analysis and Modeling of Drivers’ Response to Variable Message Signs in Shanghai, China , 2011 .

[18]  Zhong-Ren Peng,et al.  Modelling drivers’ en-route diversion behaviour under variable message sign messages using real detected traffic data , 2011 .

[19]  Khandker Nurul Habib,et al.  Modeling Travelers' Responses to Incident Information Provided by Variable Message Signs in Calgary, Canada , 2010 .

[20]  Liu Peng,et al.  Study on Comparison of Discretization Methods , 2009, 2009 International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Computational Intelligence.

[21]  Baher Abdulhai,et al.  Impacts on Traffic Diversion Rates of Changed Message on Changeable Message Sign , 2008 .

[22]  Mike McDonald,et al.  Questionnaire surveys to evaluate user response to variable message signs in an urban network , 2007 .

[23]  Jorge Ramos,et al.  Driver response to variable message signs-based traffic information , 2006 .

[24]  David M Levinson,et al.  Effectiveness of VMS Using Empirical Loop Detector Data , 2006 .

[25]  Mike McDonald,et al.  Effectiveness of using variable message signs to disseminate dynamic traffic information: Evidence from field trails in European cities , 2004 .

[26]  Ghulam H Bham,et al.  A HIGH FIDELITY TRAFFIC SIMULATION MODEL BASED ON CELLULAR AUTOMATA AND CAR-FOLLOWING CONCEPTS , 2004 .

[27]  Y. Yim,et al.  Link Flow Evaluation Using Loop Detector Data: Traveler Response to Variable-Message Signs , 1996 .

[28]  Rune Elvik,et al.  Summary : Evaluation of variable message signs in Trondheim , 2011 .

[29]  Zhong-Ren Peng,et al.  Motorist Response to Arterial Variable Message Signs , 2004 .

[30]  Jorge Ramos,et al.  Content of Variable Message Signs and On-Line Driver Behavior , 2000 .