Possibilities and limitations of novel in-vitro knee simulator.

The ex-vivo evaluation of knee kinematics remains vital to understand the impact of surgical treatments such as total knee arthroplasty (TKA). To that extent, knee simulators have been developed. However, these simulators have mainly focused on the simulation of a squatting motion. The relevance of this motion pattern for patients' activities of daily living is however questionable as squatting is difficult for elderly patients. Walking, stairs and cycling are more relevant motion patterns. This paper presents the design and control of a simulator that allows to independently control the applied kinematic and kinetic boundary conditions to simulate these daily life activities. Thereby, the knee is left with five degrees of freedom; only the knee flexion is actively controlled. From a kinetic point of view, the quadriceps and hamstring muscles are loaded. Optionally, a varus/valgus moment can be applied, facilitating a dynamic evaluation of the knee's stability. The simulator is based on three control loops, whose synchronization appears satisfactory. The input for these control loops can be determined from either musculoskeletal simulations or in accordance to literature data for traditional knee simulators. This opens the door towards an improved understanding of the knee biomechanics and comparison between different applied motion and force patterns.

[1]  Markus Wünschel,et al.  Translational and rotational knee joint stability in anterior and posterior cruciate-retaining knee arthroplasty. , 2011, The Knee.

[2]  A. Amis,et al.  Clinical biomechanics of instability related to total knee arthroplasty. , 2014, Clinical biomechanics.

[3]  James I Huddleston,et al.  Current Modes of Failure in TKA: Infection, Instability, and Stiffness Predominate , 2014, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[4]  A B Zavatsky,et al.  A kinematic-freedom analysis of a flexed-knee-stance testing rig. , 1997, Journal of biomechanics.

[5]  Amjad N. Bhatti,et al.  Deceptive appearance of a normal variant of scaphoid bone in a teenage patient: a diagnostic challenge , 2012, Orthopedic reviews.

[6]  G A Livesay,et al.  A combined robotic/universal force sensor approach to determine in situ forces of knee ligaments. , 1996, Journal of biomechanics.

[7]  Lorin P Maletsky,et al.  Computational modeling of a dynamic knee simulator for reproduction of knee loading. , 2005, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[8]  Lorin P Maletsky,et al.  Simulating dynamic activities using a five-axis knee simulator. , 2005, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[9]  Antonie J van den Bogert,et al.  Design and validation of a general purpose robotic testing system for musculoskeletal applications. , 2010, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[10]  Johan Bellemans,et al.  The influence of muscle load on tibiofemoral knee kinematics , 2009, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[11]  Todd Johnson,et al.  Can in vitro systems capture the characteristic differences between the flexion-extension kinematics of the healthy and TKA knee? , 2009, Medical engineering & physics.

[12]  E. Chao,et al.  In vitro characterization of the relationship between the Q-angle and the lateral component of the quadriceps force , 2004, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine.

[13]  Markus Wünschel,et al.  Differences in tibiofemoral kinematics between the unloaded robotic passive path and a weightbearing knee simulator , 2012, Orthopedic reviews.

[14]  M. Wünschel,et al.  The anterior cruciate ligament provides resistance to externally applied anterior tibial force but not to internal rotational torque during simulated weight-bearing flexion. , 2010, Arthroscopy : the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association.

[15]  J. Arokoski,et al.  Gait and muscle activation changes in men with knee osteoarthritis. , 2010, The Knee.

[16]  B. Koopman,et al.  A subject-specific musculoskeletal modeling framework to predict in vivo mechanics of total knee arthroplasty. , 2015, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[17]  Jason P. Halloran,et al.  Verification of predicted knee replacement kinematics during simulated gait in the Kansas knee simulator. , 2010, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[18]  E S Grood,et al.  A joint coordinate system for the clinical description of three-dimensional motions: application to the knee. , 1983, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[19]  D. Dalury,et al.  Why are total knee arthroplasties being revised? , 2013, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[20]  Robert B. Bourne,et al.  AT THE ANNUAL MEETINGS OF THE KNEE SOCIETY Patient Satisfaction after Total Knee Arthroplasty Who is Satisfied and Who is Not ? , 2009 .

[21]  D. Lloyd,et al.  An EMG-driven musculoskeletal model to estimate muscle forces and knee joint moments in vivo. , 2003, Journal of biomechanics.

[22]  Ephrat Most,et al.  Development of a 6-DOF robotic test system for studying the biomechanics of total knee replacement , 2000 .