Importance of point-by-point back projection correction for isocentric motion in digital breast tomosynthesis: relevance to morphology of structures such as microcalcifications.

Digital breast tomosynthesis is a three-dimensional imaging technique that provides an arbitrary set of reconstruction planes in the breast from a limited-angle series of projection images acquired while the x-ray tube moves. Traditional shift-and-add (SAA) tomosynthesis reconstruction is a common mathematical method to line up each projection image based on its shifting amount to generate reconstruction slices. With parallel-path geometry of tube motion, the path of the tube lies in a plane parallel to the plane of the detector. The traditional SAA algorithm gives shift amounts for each projection image calculated only along the direction of x-ray tube movement. However, with the partial isocentric motion of the x-ray tube in breast tomosynthesis, small objects such as microcalcifications appear blurred (for instance, about 1-4 pixels in blur for a microcalcification in a human breast) in traditional SAA images in the direction perpendicular to the direction of tube motion. Some digital breast tomosynthesis algorithms reported in the literature utilize a traditional one-dimensional SAA method that is not wholly suitable for isocentric motion. In this paper, a point-by-point back projection (BP) method is described and compared with traditional SAA for the important clinical task of evaluating morphology of small objects such as microcalcifications. Impulse responses at different three-dimensional locations with five different combinations of imaging acquisition parameters were investigated. Reconstruction images of microcalcifications in a human subject were also evaluated. Results showed that with traditional SAA and 45 degrees view angle of tube movement with respect to the detector, at the same height above the detector, the in-plane blur artifacts were obvious for objects farther away from x-ray source. In a human subject, the appearance of calcifications was blurred in the direction orthogonal to the tube motion with traditional SAA. With point-by-point BP, the appearance of calcifications was sharper. The point-by-point BP method demonstrated improved rendition of microcalcifications in the direction perpendicular to the tube motion direction. With wide angles or for imaging of larger breasts, this point-by-point BP rather than the traditional SAA should also be considered as the basis of further deblurring algorithms that work in conjunction with the BP method.

[1]  L. Tabár,et al.  Potential contribution of computer-aided detection to the sensitivity of screening mammography. , 2000, Radiology.

[2]  Gene Gindi,et al.  Low-contrast lesion detection in tomosynthetic breast imaging using a realistic breast phantom , 2006, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[3]  C J D'Orsi,et al.  Comparison of tomosynthesis methods used with digital mammography. , 2000, Academic radiology.

[4]  N. Pelc,et al.  Filtered backprojection for modifying the impulse response of circular tomosynthesis. , 2001, Medical physics.

[5]  Tao Wu,et al.  A comparison of reconstruction algorithms for breast tomosynthesis. , 2004, Medical physics.

[6]  J. Rakowski,et al.  A comparison of reconstruction algorithms for C-arm mammography tomosynthesis. , 2006, Medical physics.

[7]  Ying Chen,et al.  Methodology of NEQ (f) analysis for optimization and comparison of digital breast tomosynthesis acquisition techniques and reconstruction algorithms , 2007, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[8]  Günter Lauritsch,et al.  Theoretical framework for filtered back projection in tomosynthesis , 1998, Medical Imaging.

[9]  Hiroshi Matsuo,et al.  Three-dimensional image reconstruction by digital tomo-synthesis using inverse filtering , 1993, IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging.

[10]  James T Dobbins,et al.  Digital x-ray tomosynthesis: current state of the art and clinical potential. , 2003, Physics in medicine and biology.

[11]  John A. Wolfgang,et al.  SU‐FF‐I‐22: Analysis of Residual Geometric Artifacts From 4DCT , 2006 .

[12]  J. J. Gisvold,et al.  Likelihood of malignant disease for various categories of mammographically detected, nonpalpable breast lesions. , 1993, Mayo Clinic proceedings.

[13]  D. Godfrey,et al.  Optimization of the matrix inversion tomosynthesis (MITS) impulse response and modulation transfer function characteristics for chest imaging. , 2006, Medical physics.

[14]  James T. Dobbins,et al.  Optimization of matrix inverse tomosynthesis , 2001, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[15]  D. Kopans,et al.  Digital tomosynthesis in breast imaging. , 1997, Radiology.

[16]  Lubomir M. Hadjiiski,et al.  A comparative study of limited-angle cone-beam reconstruction methods for breast tomosynthesis. , 2006, Medical physics.

[17]  Joseph Y. Lo,et al.  SU‐FF‐I‐21: Two‐Dimensional Shift‐And‐Add (SAA) Algorithm for Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Reconstruction , 2006 .

[18]  Joseph Y. Lo,et al.  Gaussian frequency blending algorithm with matrix inversion tomosynthesis (MITS) and filtered back projection (FBP) for better digital breast tomosynthesis reconstruction , 2006, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[19]  Thomas Mertelmeier,et al.  Optimizing filtered backprojection reconstruction for a breast tomosynthesis prototype device , 2006, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[20]  Joseph Y. Lo,et al.  Impulse response analysis for several digital tomosynthesis mammography reconstruction algorithms , 2005, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[21]  D. Kopans The positive predictive value of mammography. , 1992, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[22]  L J Yeoman,et al.  Screening interval breast cancers: mammographic features and prognosis factors. , 1996, Radiology.

[23]  D. Kopans,et al.  Tomographic mammography using a limited number of low-dose cone-beam projection images. , 2003, Medical physics.

[24]  C J D'Orsi,et al.  Evaluation of linear and nonlinear tomosynthetic reconstruction methods in digital mammography. , 2001, Academic radiology.

[25]  L. Fajardo Diagnosis of Diseases of the Breast, 2nd ed. , 2006 .

[26]  Joseph Y. Lo,et al.  Digital breast tomosynthesis using an amorphous selenium flat panel detector , 2005, SPIE Medical Imaging.