Timing analysis techniques at large core distances for multi-TeV gamma ray astronomy

Abstract We present an analysis technique that uses the timing information of Cherenkov images from extensive air showers (EAS). Our emphasis is on distant, or large core distance γ -ray induced showers at multi-TeV energies. Specifically, combining pixel timing information with an improved direction reconstruction algorithm, leads to improvements in angular and core resolution as large as ∼40% and ∼30%, respectively, when compared with the same algorithm without the use of timing. Above 10 TeV, this results in an angular resolution approaching 0.05°, together with a core resolution better than ∼15 m. The off-axis post-cut γ -ray acceptance is energy dependent and its full width at half maximum ranges from 4° to 8°. For shower directions that are up to ∼6° off-axis, the angular resolution achieved by using timing information is comparable, around 100 TeV, to the on-axis angular resolution. The telescope specifications and layout we describe here are geared towards energies above 10 TeV. However, the methods can in principle be applied to other energies, given suitable telescope parameters. The 5-telescope cell investigated in this study could initially pave the way for a larger array of sparsely spaced telescopes in an effort to push the collection area to >10 km 2 . These results highlight the potential of a ‘sparse array’ approach in effectively opening up the energy range above 10 TeV.

[1]  H. Krawczynski,et al.  Comparison of techniques to reconstruct VHE gamma-ray showers from multiple stereoscopic Cherenkov images , 1999 .

[2]  Fletcher,et al.  SIBYLL: An event generator for simulation of high energy cosmic ray cascades. , 1994, Physical review. D, Particles and fields.

[3]  Mathieu de Naurois,et al.  A high performance likelihood reconstruction of γ-rays for imaging atmospheric Cherenkov telescopes , 2009, 0907.2610.

[4]  Albert Schliesser,et al.  Wide-field prime-focus Imaging Atmospheric Cherenkov Telescopes: A systematic study , 2005 .

[5]  P. Colin,et al.  Optimization of large homogeneous air Cherenkov arrays and application to the design of a 1–100 TeV γ-ray observatory , 2009, 0909.3792.

[6]  T. Wibig,et al.  Measurable difference in Cherenkov light between gamma and hadron induced EAS , 1997 .

[7]  L. A. Antonelli,et al.  Improving the performance of the single-dish Cherenkov telescope MAGIC through the use of signal timing , 2009 .

[8]  A. Hillas,et al.  Differences between gamma-ray and hadronic showers , 1996 .

[9]  Felix Aharonian,et al.  High energy astrophysics with ground-based gamma ray detectors , 2008 .

[10]  A. Konopelko,et al.  Performance of the stereoscopic system of the HEGRA imaging air Čerenkov telescopes: Monte Carlo simulations and observations , 1999 .

[11]  W. Rhode,et al.  The time structure of Cherenkov images generated by TeV γ-rays and by cosmic rays , 1998 .

[12]  M. Tluczykont,et al.  Selection and 3D-Reconstruction of Gamma-Ray-induced Air Showers with a Stereoscopic System of Atmospheric Cherenkov Telescopes , 2006, astro-ph/0601373.

[13]  Pierre V. Sokolsky,et al.  The Utah Fly's Eye detector , 1985 .

[14]  K. Bernlöhr,et al.  The H.E.S.S. Survey of the Inner Galaxy in Very High Energy Gamma Rays , 2005 .

[15]  W. Hofmann,et al.  On the optimization of multichannel cameras for imaging atmospheric Cherenkov telescopes , 1995 .

[16]  M. Holler,et al.  Observations of the Crab Nebula with H.E.S.S , 2005 .

[17]  A. Daum,et al.  Stereoscopic imaging of air showers with the first two HEGRA Cherenkov telescopes , 1996 .

[18]  A. Noutsos,et al.  A New Population of Very High Energy Gamma-Ray Sources in the Milky Way , 2005, Science.

[19]  Extending the sensitivity of air Čerenkov telescopes , 2006, astro-ph/0602284.

[20]  K. Bernlohr,et al.  Simulation of Imaging Atmospheric Cherenkov Telescopes with CORSIKA and sim_telarray , 2008, 0808.2253.

[21]  J. Holder,et al.  Exploiting VERITAS Timing Information , 2005 .