Formal semantics for perceptual classification PREPRINT VERSION

A formal semantics for low-level perceptual aspects of meaning is presented, tying these together with the logical-inferential aspects of meaning traditionally studied in formal semantics. The key idea is to model perceptual meanings as classifiers of perceptual input. Furthermore, we show how perceptual aspects of meaning can be updated as a result of observing language use in interaction, thereby enabling fine-grained semantic plasticity and semantic coordination. This requires a framework where intensions are (i) represented independently of extensions, and (ii) structured objects which can be modified as a result of learning. We use Type Theory with Records (TTR), a formal semantics framework that starts from the idea that information and meaning is founded on our ability to perceive and classify the world, i.e. to perceive objects and situations as being of types. As an example of our approach, we show how a simple classifier of spatial information based on the Perceptron can be

[1]  Ronnie Cann,et al.  Aspects of Semantics and Pragmatics of Dialogue , 2010 .

[2]  Staffan Larsson,et al.  Reciprocal Learning via Dialogue Interaction: Challenges and Prospects , 2011, IJCAI 2011.

[3]  Robin Cooper,et al.  Austinian Truth, Attitudes and Type Theory , 2005 .

[4]  M. Pickering,et al.  Toward a mechanistic psychology of dialogue , 2004, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[5]  David Traum,et al.  The Information State Approach to Dialogue Management , 2003 .

[6]  D. Roy Grounding words in perception and action: computational insights , 2005, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[7]  S. Garrod,et al.  Saying what you mean in dialogue: A study in conceptual and semantic co-ordination , 1987, Cognition.

[8]  Alex Lascarides,et al.  Logics of Conversation , 2005, Studies in natural language processing.

[9]  Paul Sambre,et al.  Gilles Fauconnier & Mark Turner, " The way we think: conceptual blending and the mind's hidden complexities" , 2002 .

[10]  N. Curteanu Book Reviews: Lecture on Contemporary Syntactic Theories: An Introduction to Unification-Based Approaches to Grammar , 1987, CL.

[11]  M. Jacks,et al.  Young children ’ s uptake of new words in conversation , 2010 .

[12]  Shalom Lappin,et al.  An Operational Approach to Fine-Grained Intensionality , 2012 .

[13]  J. Ridley Studies of Interference in Serial Verbal Reactions , 2001 .

[14]  C. D. Claiborn,et al.  Talk and Social Organization. , 1988 .

[15]  Luke S. Zettlemoyer,et al.  A Joint Model of Language and Perception for Grounded Attribute Learning , 2012, ICML.

[16]  N. Cocchiarella,et al.  Situations and Attitudes. , 1986 .

[17]  van Jan Eijck,et al.  Probabilistic Semantics for Natural Language , 2014 .

[18]  R. Cooper Type Theory and Semantics in Flux , 2012 .

[19]  Per Martin-Löf,et al.  Intuitionistic type theory , 1984, Studies in proof theory.

[20]  Robin Cooper,et al.  Information States, Attitudes and Dependent Record Types , 1998 .

[21]  James L. McClelland,et al.  The parallel distributed processing approach to semantic cognition , 2003, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[22]  Jerome Feldman,et al.  Embodied language, best-fit analysis, and formal compositionality. , 2010, Physics of life reviews.

[23]  Sylvain Pogodalla,et al.  Proceedings of the 6th international conference on Logical aspects of computational linguistics , 2011 .

[24]  付伶俐 打磨Using Language,倡导新理念 , 2014 .

[25]  Susan E. Brennan,et al.  LEXICAL ENTRAINMENT IN SPONTANEOUS DIALOG , 1996 .

[26]  Staffan Larsson,et al.  Towards a Formal View of Corrective Feedback , 2009 .

[27]  Robin Cooper,et al.  Type Theory with Records and Unification-based Grammar , 2007 .

[28]  Sta,et al.  The TTR perceptron : Dynamic perceptual meanings and semantic coordination , 2011 .

[29]  Nicholas Asher Lexical Meaning in Context: Preface , 2011 .

[30]  Robin Cooper,et al.  Negative Inquisitiveness and Alternatives-Based Negation , 2011, Amsterdam Colloquium on Logic, Language and Meaning.

[31]  G. Fauconnier,et al.  The Way We Think: Conceptual Blending and the Mind''s Hidden Complexities. Basic Books , 2002 .

[32]  Wilson S. Geisler,et al.  A Bayesian approach to the evolution of perceptual and cognitive systems , 2003, Cogn. Sci..

[33]  Daniel Lassiter,et al.  Vagueness as Probabilistic Linguistic Knowledge , 2009, ViC.

[34]  Patrick Pantel,et al.  From Frequency to Meaning: Vector Space Models of Semantics , 2010, J. Artif. Intell. Res..

[35]  C. Barker The Dynamics of Vagueness , 2002 .

[36]  F ROSENBLATT,et al.  The perceptron: a probabilistic model for information storage and organization in the brain. , 1958, Psychological review.

[37]  Robin Cooper,et al.  Compositional and ontological semantics in learning from corrective feedback and explicit definition , 2006 .

[38]  Floris Roelofsen,et al.  Logic, Language and Meaning , 2012, Lecture Notes in Computer Science.

[39]  L. Steels,et al.  coordinating perceptually grounded categories through language: a case study for colour , 2005, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[40]  A. Leonardis,et al.  A basic cognitive system for interactive continuous learning of visual concepts , 2010 .

[41]  Stevan Harnad The Symbol Grounding Problem , 1999, ArXiv.

[42]  Mirella Lapata,et al.  Proceedings of ACL-08: HLT , 2008 .

[43]  Susan Carey,et al.  Acquiring a Single New Word , 1978 .

[44]  Robin Cooper,et al.  Copredication, Quantification and Frames , 2011, LACL.

[45]  Staffan Larsson,et al.  Do Dialogues Have Content? , 2011, LACL.

[46]  John P. Frisby,et al.  Seeing, Second Edition: The Computational Approach to Biological Vision , 2010 .

[47]  Christine D. Wilson,et al.  Grounding conceptual knowledge in modality-specific systems , 2003, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[48]  Staffan Larsson,et al.  Coordinating on ad-hoc semantic systems in dialogue , 2007 .

[49]  Jayant Krishnamurthy,et al.  Jointly Learning to Parse and Perceive: Connecting Natural Language to the Physical World , 2013, TACL.

[50]  Robin Cooper,et al.  Spatial Descriptions in Type Theory with Records , 2013 .

[51]  Jonathan Ginzburg,et al.  The Interactive Stance , 2012 .

[52]  Robin Cooper,et al.  Negation in dialogue , 2011 .

[53]  Mirella Lapata,et al.  Vector-based Models of Semantic Composition , 2008, ACL.

[54]  M. Bar Visual objects in context , 2004, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[55]  Evena Wong,et al.  Pragmatic directions about language use: Offers of words and relations , 2002, Language in Society.

[56]  Simon Kirby,et al.  Language in Flux: Dialogue Coordination, Language Variation, Change and Evolution , 2008 .

[57]  Deb Roy,et al.  Semantic context effects on color categorization , 2009 .

[58]  Reinhard Muskens,et al.  Sense and the Computation of Reference , 2005 .

[59]  Josef van Genabith,et al.  Dynamically structuring, updating and interrelating representations of visual and linguistic discourse context , 2005, Artif. Intell..

[60]  L. Wittgenstein Philosophical investigations = Philosophische Untersuchungen , 1958 .

[61]  Robin Cooper,et al.  Enthymemes as Rhetorical Resources , 2011 .

[62]  Kenny R. Coventry,et al.  Function, geometry and spatial prepositions: Three experiments , 1999, Spatial Cogn. Comput..

[63]  Ivan A. Sag,et al.  Book Reviews: Head-driven Phrase Structure Grammar and German in Head-driven Phrase-structure Grammar , 1996, CL.

[64]  Thierry Coquand,et al.  A Logical Framework with Dependently Typed Records , 2003, Fundam. Informaticae.

[65]  Nicholas Asher,et al.  Lexical Meaning in Context - A Web of Words , 2011 .