Impact of diagnostic guidelines on the diagnosis of hypersensitivity pneumonitis

Introduction Hypersensitivity pneumonitis (HP) is an immune-mediated interstitial lung disease from exposure to environmental antigens. Diagnosing HP could be challenging. The American College of Chest Physicians (CHEST) and American Thoracic Society/Japanese Respiratory Society/and Asociación Latinoamericana del Tórax (ATS/JRS/ALAT) have published diagnostic guidelines in 2021 and 2020 respectively. The CHEST guideline uses four grades of confidence: confident (>90%), provisional high (70–89%), provisional low (51–69%), and unlikely (≤50%). The ATS/JRS/ALAT guideline uses five grades of confidence: definite (>90%), high (80–89%), moderate (70–79%), low (51–69%) and not excluded (≤50%). In this study, we determined how these two guidelines could have affected the diagnosis of HP made before the guidelines. Methods Two hundred and fifty-nine adult patients from a previous cohort with HP (ICD-9:495) made between Jan. 1, 2008, and Dec. 31, 2013, at Duke University Medical Center were included. We simplified the diagnostic confidence into three categories so we could compare the guidelines: high (≥90%), intermediate (51–89%), and low (≤50%). Results There were 156 female and 103 male. Mean age was 58 (range: 20–90). 68.8% of the patients had restrictive defects (FVC < 80% pred) and 48.6% had lung biopsy. The CHEST guideline classified 33.6% of the patients into high, 59.5% into intermediate and 6.9% into low confidence categories. The ATS/JRS/ALAT guideline classified 29.7% of the patients into high, 21.2% into intermediate and 49.0% into low confidence categories (p < 0.0001 vs. CHEST). Cohen's kappa was 0.331. In patients with identifiable inciting agents (IAs) (N = 168), the CHEST guideline classified 32.1% of the patients into high, 64.3% into intermediate and 3.6% into low confidence categories. The ATS/JRS/ALAT guideline classified 29.2% of the patients into high, 20.8% into intermediate, and 50.0% into low confidence categories. Cohen's kappa was 0.314. Discussion In our HP cohort with two-thirds of the patients with restrictive defects, we found the two guidelines had fair agreement in diagnosing HP with or without identifiable IAs. They agreed more when the diagnostic confidence was high. When the diagnostic confidence was lower, however, the ATS/JRS/ALAT guideline was more stringent. Clinicians should be aware of the differences between the two guidelines when evaluating patients suspicious of HP.

[1]  J. Ryu,et al.  Antigen identification and avoidance on outcomes in fibrotic hypersensitivity pneumonitis , 2022, European Respiratory Journal.

[2]  M. Strek,et al.  Hypersensitivity pneumonitis: Current concepts in pathogenesis, diagnosis, and treatment , 2021, Allergy.

[3]  M. Selman,et al.  Comparing the Performance of Two Recommended Criteria for Establishing a Diagnosis for Hypersensitivity Pneumonitis. , 2021, American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine.

[4]  H. Collard,et al.  Exposures and associations with clinical phenotypes in hypersensitivity pneumonitis: A scoping review. , 2021, Respiratory medicine.

[5]  D. Lynch,et al.  Diagnosis and Evaluation of Hypersensitivity Pneumonitis: CHEST Guideline and Expert Panel Report. , 2021, Chest.

[6]  G. Raghu,et al.  Hypersensitivity Pneumonitis and (Idiopathic) Pulmonary Fibrosis Due to Feather Duvets and Pillows , 2021, Archivos de Bronconeumología (English Edition).

[7]  G. Raghu,et al.  Exposure Assessment Tools for Hypersensitivity Pneumonitis. An Official American Thoracic Society Workshop Report , 2020, Annals of the American Thoracic Society.

[8]  P. Spagnolo,et al.  Hypersensitivity pneumonitis , 2020, Nature Reviews Disease Primers.

[9]  Jonathan H. Chung,et al.  Diagnosis of Hypersensitivity Pneumonitis in Adults. An Official ATS/JRS/ALAT Clinical Practice Guideline , 2020, American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine.

[10]  Y. Huang,et al.  Chronic hypersensitivity pneumonitis in the southeastern United States: an assessment of how clinicians reached the diagnosis , 2019, BMC Pulmonary Medicine.

[11]  Stephen H. Bell,et al.  A ?scoping review. , 2018, Sexual health.

[12]  Lilian T. Kuranishi,et al.  Change in FVC and survival in chronic fibrotic hypersensitivity pneumonitis , 2017, Thorax.

[13]  A. Nicholson,et al.  Fibrotic Hypersensitivity Pneumonitis: Key Issues in Diagnosis and Management , 2017, Journal of clinical medicine.

[14]  T. Akashi,et al.  Histological variability and consequences in chronic bird‐related hypersensitivity pneumonitis , 2017, Respirology.

[15]  A. Woolcock,et al.  Bird breeder's hypersensitivity pneumonitis: progress studies of lung function after cessation of exposure to the provoking antigen. , 2015, The American review of respiratory disease.

[16]  C. Glazer Chronic hypersensitivity pneumonitis: important considerations in the work-up of this fibrotic lung disease , 2015, Current opinion in pulmonary medicine.

[17]  M. Selman,et al.  Hypersensitivity pneumonitis: insights in diagnosis and pathobiology. , 2012, American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine.

[18]  T. Hartman,et al.  Hot tub lung: presenting features and clinical course of 21 patients. , 2006, Respiratory medicine.

[19]  F. Morell,et al.  Time of exposure as a prognostic factor in avian hypersensitivity pneumonitis. , 1989, Respiratory medicine.

[20]  Jacob Cohen A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales , 1960 .

[21]  W. Travis,et al.  Diagnosis and Evaluation of Hypersensitivity Pneumonitis , 2021 .

[22]  M. Zacharisen Idiopathic interstitial pneumonia: are we missing hypersensitivity pneumonitis? , 2002, Annals of allergy, asthma & immunology : official publication of the American College of Allergy, Asthma, & Immunology.