Still underdetected - social norms and collective efficacy predict the acceptance of electric vehicles in germany

The role of social identity variables for predicting environmental decisions may often be underdetected by psychological lay people. Applying this to the acceptance of electric vehicles (EVs) in Germany we investigated whether social norms and collective efficacy predict EV acceptance and what psychological laypersons who are either EV experts or EV non-experts think predicts EV acceptance. In preliminary interview studies we explored the beliefs of EV experts and EV non-experts. In a survey study, we then tested whether cost-related advantages and disadvantages were predictive of EV acceptance and whether norms and collective efficacy have independent effects even when controlling for cost-related factors and demographic variables. RESULTS suggest that both EV experts and EV non-experts considered cost-related factors as much more important than social identity processes. However, hierarchical regression analyses of the survey data showed that norms and collective efficacy have equal or even stronger effects on acceptance than cost-related factors. We discuss the theoretical and practical implications of these findings. Language: en

[1]  K. S. Gallagher,et al.  Giving Green to Get Green: Incentives and Consumer Adoption of Hybrid Vehicle Technology , 2008 .

[2]  Philipp Haas,et al.  Hybrid and electric low-noise cars cause an increase in traffic accidents involving vulnerable road users in urban areas , 2013, International journal of injury control and safety promotion.

[3]  Ernst H. Noppers,et al.  The adoption of sustainable innovations: Driven by symbolic and environmental motives , 2014 .

[4]  Andreas R. Ziegler,et al.  Individual Characteristics and Stated Preferences for Alternative Energy Sources and Propulsion Technologies in Vehicles: A Discrete Choice Analysis , 2010 .

[5]  Linda Steg,et al.  Can Protection Motivation Theory predict pro-environmental behavior? Explaining the adoption of electric vehicles in the Netherlands , 2014 .

[6]  Charles Abraham,et al.  Mainstream consumers driving plug-in battery-electric and plug-in hybrid electric cars: A qualitative analysis of responses and evaluations , 2012 .

[7]  Peter Cocron,et al.  Driver perceptions of the safety implications of quiet electric vehicles. , 2013, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[8]  Emmanuel Chéron,et al.  Electric vehicle purchasing intentions: the concern over battery charge duration and risk of failure 1 , 1997 .

[9]  Noah J. Goldstein,et al.  Normative Social Influence is Underdetected , 2008, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[10]  Suzanna Long,et al.  Barriers to widespread adoption of electric vehicles: An analysis of consumer attitudes and perceptions , 2012 .

[11]  Jonn Axsen,et al.  Interpersonal influence in the early plug-in hybrid market: Observing social interactions with an exploratory multi-method approach , 2011 .

[12]  Thomas Franke,et al.  Is EV experience related to EV acceptance? Results from a German field study , 2014 .

[13]  B. Simon,et al.  Collective identification and social movement participation. , 1998 .

[14]  Torsten Masson,et al.  Adherence to climate change-related ingroup norms: Do dimensions of group identification matter? , 2014 .

[15]  Johan Jansson Consumer eco-innovation adoption : Assessing attitudinal factors and perceived product characteristics , 2011 .

[16]  C. Klöckner The dynamics of purchasing an electric vehicle – A prospective longitudinal study of the decision-making process , 2014 .

[17]  Reinhard Madlener,et al.  Consumer Preferences for Alternative Fuel Vehicles: A Discrete Choice Analysis , 2012 .

[18]  M. Hogg,et al.  The theory of planned behaviour: self-identity, social identity and group norms. , 1999, The British journal of social psychology.

[19]  M. Kandlikar,et al.  Green Drivers or Free Riders? An Analysis of Tax Rebates for Hybrid Vehicles , 2010 .

[20]  E. Hertwich,et al.  Carbon footprint of nations: a global, trade-linked analysis. , 2009, Environmental science & technology.

[21]  H. Tajfel,et al.  Social categorization and similarity in intergroup behaviour , 1973 .

[22]  D. Terry,et al.  Congruent or conflicted? The impact of injunctive and descriptive norms on environmental intentions , 2012 .

[23]  Noah J. Goldstein,et al.  A Room with a Viewpoint: Using Social Norms to Motivate Environmental Conservation in Hotels , 2008 .

[24]  Stephen Skippon,et al.  Responses to battery electric vehicles: UK consumer attitudes and attributions of symbolic meaning following direct experience to reduce psychological distance , 2011 .

[25]  S. Bamberg Changing environmentally harmful behaviors: A stage model of self-regulated behavioral change , 2013 .

[26]  Patrick Spieth,et al.  Innovative alternatives take action – Investigating determinants of alternative fuel vehicle adoption , 2014 .

[27]  Meryl P. Gardner,et al.  Willingness to pay for electric vehicles and their attributes , 2011 .

[28]  I. Ajzen The theory of planned behavior , 1991 .

[29]  Jonn Axsen,et al.  Social influence and consumer preference formation for pro-environmental technology: The case of a U.K. workplace electric-vehicle study , 2013 .

[30]  Carl A. Kallgren,et al.  A focus theory of normative conduct: Recycling the concept of norms to reduce littering in public places. , 1990 .

[31]  Pavlos S. Kanaroglou,et al.  Household demand and willingness to pay for clean vehicles , 2007 .

[32]  I. Neumann,et al.  Experiencing Range in an Electric Vehicle: Understanding Psychological Barriers , 2012 .

[33]  E. Rogers Diffusion of Innovations , 1962 .

[34]  Christian A. Klöckner,et al.  Positive and negative spillover effects from electric car purchase to car use , 2013 .

[35]  William Sierzchula,et al.  Factors influencing fleet manager adoption of electric vehicles , 2014 .

[36]  A. Homburg,et al.  Explaining pro-environmental behavior with a cognitive theory of stress , 2006 .

[37]  Shanjun Li,et al.  Gasoline Prices, Government Support, and the Demand for Hybrid Vehicles in the United States , 2011 .

[38]  David Banister,et al.  Realizing the electric-vehicle revolution , 2012 .

[39]  H. Tajfel,et al.  An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. , 1979 .

[40]  Ryuichi Kitamura,et al.  Demand for clean-fuel vehicles in California: A discrete-choice stated preference pilot project , 1993 .

[41]  Catarina Rolim,et al.  Electric vehicle adopters in Lisbon: motivation, utilization patterns and environmental impacts , 2014 .

[42]  Jolanda Jetten,et al.  Social Identity, Health and Well-Being: An Emerging Agenda for Applied Psychology , 2009 .

[43]  Joseph S. Krupa,et al.  Analysis of a consumer survey on plug-in hybrid electric vehicles , 2014 .

[44]  Elisabetta Cherchi,et al.  On the stability of preferences and attitudes before and after experiencing an electric vehicle , 2013 .

[45]  T. Postmes,et al.  Toward an integrative social identity model of collective action: a quantitative research synthesis of three socio-psychological perspectives. , 2008, Psychological bulletin.

[46]  Tobias Kuhnimhof,et al.  Travel trends among young adults in Germany: increasing multimodality and declining car use for men , 2012 .

[47]  Winnifred R. Louis,et al.  Group Norms and the Attitude–Behaviour Relationship , 2009 .

[48]  Katherine M White,et al.  Social influence in the theory of planned behaviour: the role of descriptive, injunctive, and in-group norms. , 2009, The British journal of social psychology.

[49]  Michael Jay Polonsky,et al.  Impediments to consumer adoption of sustainable transportation: Alternative fuel vehicles , 2001 .

[50]  R. Cialdini,et al.  Social influence: Social norms, conformity and compliance. , 1998 .

[51]  Thomas Franke,et al.  Interacting with limited mobility resources: Psychological range levels in electric vehicle use , 2013 .

[52]  B. Wee,et al.  The influence of financial incentives and other socio-economic factors on electric vehicle adoption , 2014 .

[53]  Nadine Rauh,et al.  Understanding the Impact of Electric Vehicle Driving Experience on Range Anxiety , 2015, Hum. Factors.