Physical Variables in the Olfactory Stimulation Process

Electrical recording from small twigs of nerve in a tortoise showed that olfactory, vomeronasal, and trigeminal receptors in the nose are responsive to various odorants. No one kind of receptor was most sensitive to all odorants. For controlled stimulation, odorant was caused to appear in a stream of gas already flowing through the nose. Of the parameters definable at the naris, temperature, relative humidity, and nature of inert gas had little effect on olfactory responses to amyl acetate, whereas odorant species, odorant concentration, and volume flow rate effectively determined the responses of all nasal chemoreceptors. An intrinsic variable of accessibility to the receptors, particularly olfactory, was demonstrated. Flow dependence of chemoreceptor responses is thought to reflect the necessity for delivery of odorant molecules to receptor sites. Since the olfactory receptors are relatively exposed, plateauing of the response with flow rate for slightly soluble odorants suggests an approach to concentration equilibrium in the overlying mucus with that in the air entering the naris. Accordingly, data for responses to amyl acetate were fitted with Beidler's (1954) taste equation for two kinds of sites being active. The requirement for finite aqueous solubility, if true, suggests substitution of aqueous solutions for gaseous solutions. A suitable medium was found and results conformed to expectations. Olfactory receptors were insensitive to variation of ionic strength, pH, and osmotic pressure.

[1]  T. Shibuya,et al.  ‘On’- and ‘Off’- Responses of the Olfactory Epithelium , 1959, Nature.

[2]  S UEKI,et al.  Some evidence for a mechanical receptor in olfactory function. , 1961, Journal of neurophysiology.

[3]  M. Stuiver,et al.  Biophysics of the sense of smell , 1958 .

[4]  G. M. Dyson The Chemical Senses , 1946, Nature.

[5]  A. Proetz,et al.  Applied Physiology of the Nose , 1942 .

[6]  J. Magnen Étude des facteurs dynamiques de l'excitation olfactive , 1944 .

[7]  J. T. Davies,et al.  THE ROLE OF ADSORPTION AND MOLECULAR MORPHOLOGY IN OLFACTION: THE CALCULATION OF OLFACTORY THRESHOLDS , 1959 .

[8]  L. Adrian The Journal of Laryngology and Otology THE ACTION OF THE MAMMALIAN OLFACTORY ORGAN* , 2022 .

[9]  V. Negus,et al.  The function of the paranasal sinuses. , 1957, Acta oto-laryngologica.

[10]  T. Shibuya,et al.  The electrical activity of the olfactory epithelium studied with micro- and macro-electrodes. , 1960, The Japanese journal of physiology.

[11]  E. Adrian,et al.  The electrical activity of the mammalian olfactory bulb. , 1950, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[12]  Electrophysiology of olfactory bulb. , 1958, Journal of neurophysiology.

[13]  L. Mullins THE MACROMOLECULAR PROPERTIES OF EXCITABLE MEMBRANES * , 1961, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[14]  D. Ottoson,et al.  Sustained potentials evoked by olfactory stimulation. , 1954, Acta physiologica Scandinavica.

[15]  E. Adrian Olfactory reactions in the brain of the hedgehog , 1942, The Journal of physiology.

[16]  A. E. Hopkins The olfactory receptors in vertebrates , 1926 .

[17]  K. B. Corbin Observations on the peripheral distribution of fibers arising in the mesencephalic nucleus of the fifth cranial nerve , 1940 .

[18]  G. C. Huber,et al.  Observations on the peripheral distribution of the nervus terminalis in mammalia , 1913 .

[19]  L. Beidler,et al.  Response of nasal epithelium to odor stimulation. , 1955, Science.

[20]  E. D. Adrian,et al.  I. - Olfactory discrimination , 1949 .

[21]  L. M. Beidler,et al.  Properties of chemoreceptors of tongue of rat. , 1953, Journal of neurophysiology.

[22]  R. Moncrieff The sorptive properties of the olfactory membrane , 1955, The Journal of physiology.

[23]  V. Negus The evolutionary history of man from the evidence of the nose and larynx. , 1957, A.M.A. archives of otolaryngology.

[24]  H. S. Gasser OLFACTORY NERVE FIBERS , 1956, The Journal of general physiology.

[25]  L. M. Beidler,et al.  A THEORY OF TASTE STIMULATION , 1954, The Journal of general physiology.

[26]  L. Mullins AN ANALYSIS OF CONDUCTANCE CHANGES IN SQUID AXON , 1959, The Journal of general physiology.

[27]  D. Ottoson,et al.  Analysis of the electrical activity of the olfactory epithelium. , 1955, Acta physiologica Scandinavica. Supplementum.

[28]  A. C. Allison,et al.  Quantitative observations on the olfactory system of the rabbit. , 1949, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[29]  M. Nickerson Receptor Occupancy and Tissue Response , 1956, Nature.