Planning for long-duration space exploration: Interviews with NASA subject matter experts

Abstract Planning is critical to organizations, especially for those involved in pursuing technologic, scientific, and innovative ventures. Examination of planning processes is particularly important in high-stake and high-risk environments. In the present study, to highlight the significance of planning in the context of long-duration space missions, 11 current and former National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) personnel were interviewed to gain a better understanding of astronaut and Mission Control leadership in preparing for and carrying out space missions. Interviewees focused their responses on perceptions of leadership and thoughts on how long-duration spaceflight leadership should be different from current and short-term spaceflight. Notes from these interviews were content coded and qualitatively analyzed. We found that cognitive planning skills and case-based reasoning were among the variables that were most highly rated for being critical to the success of long-duration space missions. Moreover, qualitative analyses revealed new considerations for long-duration space missions, such as granting greater autonomy to crewmembers and the need for more near-term forecasting. The implications of these findings for understanding the planning processes and necessary characteristics of individuals tasked with planning are discussed.

[1]  E. A. Fleishman,et al.  Leadership skills for a changing world: Solving complex social problems. , 2000 .

[2]  Mark T. Keane On Adaptation in Analogy: Tests of Pragmatic Importance and Adaptability in Analogical Problem Solving , 1996 .

[3]  Rosemary A. Schultz,et al.  Planning in organizations: Performance as a multi-level phenomenon , 2002 .

[4]  Holly K. Osburn,et al.  Training and Development for Organizational Planning Skills , 2015 .

[5]  Sidney Gael The Job analysis handbook for business, industry, and government , 1988 .

[6]  Tyler J. Mulhearn,et al.  Leadership Models for Team Dynamics and Cohesion: The Mars Mission , 2015 .

[7]  David R. Thomas,et al.  A General Inductive Approach for Analyzing Qualitative Evaluation Data , 2006 .

[8]  R. Daft,et al.  Chief executive scanning, environmental characteristics, and company performance: An empirical study , 1988 .

[9]  Raymond M. Berger,et al.  A factor-analytic study of planning abilities. , 1957 .

[10]  Rosemary A. Schultz,et al.  Performance in Planning: Processes, Requirements, and Errors , 2001 .

[11]  M. Mumford,et al.  Putting Creativity to Work: Effects of Leader Behavior on Subordinate Creativity , 1993 .

[12]  S. Sonnentag Expertise in professional software design: a process study. , 1998, The Journal of applied psychology.

[13]  Edwin A. Locke,et al.  Goal setting, planning, and organizational performance: An experimental simulation , 1990 .

[14]  Michael Frese,et al.  Goal orientation and planfulness: Action styles as personality concepts. , 1987 .

[15]  Gene Kranz,et al.  Failure Is Not an Option: Mission Control from Mercury to Apollo 13 and Beyond , 2000 .

[16]  Y. Trope,et al.  The role of feasibility and desirability considerations in near and distant future decisions: A test of temporal construal theory. , 1998 .

[17]  Michael D. Mumford,et al.  Assessment of leader problem-solving capabilities. , 2000 .

[18]  Carolyn Axtell,et al.  SEEING ANOTHER VIEWPOINT: ANTECEDENTS AND OUTCOMES OF EMPLOYEE PERSPECTIVE TAKING , 2001 .

[19]  Paul Milgram,et al.  Planning behavior and its functional role in interactions with complex systems , 1997, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part A.

[20]  Daniel J. Simons,et al.  Everyday planning: An analysis of daily time management , 1992 .

[21]  Michael D. Mumford,et al.  Applying Multiple Knowledge Structures in Creative Thought: Effects on Idea Generation and Problem-Solving , 2008 .

[22]  P. Earley,et al.  Work plan availability and performance: An assessment of task strategy priming on subsequent task completion , 1987 .

[23]  Michael D. Mumford,et al.  Leader vision formation and forecasting: The effects of forecasting extent, resources, and timeframe , 2010 .

[24]  Stephen J. Read,et al.  The effects of expertise on financial problem solving: Evidence for goal-directed, problem-solving scripts , 1990 .

[25]  Michael D. Mumford,et al.  Planning for innovation: A multi-level perspective , 2007 .

[26]  Michael D. Mumford,et al.  Creativity and Planning: Training Interventions to Develop Creative Problem-Solving Skills , 2006 .

[27]  B. Abernethy,et al.  Visual–perceptual and cognitive differences between expert, intermediate, and novice snooker players , 1994 .

[28]  James Kauffman,et al.  A successful failure: NASA’s crisis communications regarding Apollo 13 , 2001 .

[29]  Kristian J. Hammond,et al.  Case-based planning: A framework for planning from experience ☆ , 1990 .

[30]  Michelene T. H. Chi,et al.  Expertise in Problem Solving. , 1981 .

[31]  R. Weisberg Creativity: Understanding Innovation in Problem Solving, Science, Invention, and the Arts , 2006 .

[32]  M. Mumford,et al.  Conceptual Combination: Alternative Knowledge Structures, Alternative Heuristics , 2005 .

[33]  Inger G. Stensaker,et al.  Change experience and employee reactions: developing capabilities for change , 2011 .

[34]  Samuel Todd Hunter,et al.  Planning for Innovation: A Process Oriented Perspective , 2012 .