Intramedullary rod insertion places the femoral component more laterally during Oxford medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty

[1]  T. Fujishiro,et al.  Bearing separation from the lateral wall of the tibial component is a risk of anterior dislocation of the mobile-bearing in Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. , 2022, Journal of Arthroplasty.

[2]  T. Fujishiro,et al.  Manipulation of Tibial Component to Ensure Avoidance of Bearing Separation from the Vertical Wall of Tibial Component in Oxford Unicompartmental Arthroplasty , 2021, Clinics in orthopedic surgery.

[3]  T. Fujishiro,et al.  A Modified Under-Vastus Approach for Knee Arthroplasty with Anatomical Repair of Soft Tissue , 2019, Clinics in orthopedic surgery.

[4]  R. Kuroda,et al.  Adequate Positioning of the Tibial Component Is Key to Avoiding Bearing Impingement in Oxford Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty. , 2019, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[5]  K. Takaoka,et al.  Medium-term clinical results of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty for the treatment for spontaneous osteonecrosis of the knee with four to 15 years of follow-up. , 2019, The Knee.

[6]  Sakae Tanaka,et al.  Meniscal bearing dislocation while rolling over in sleep following Oxford medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. , 2019, The Knee.

[7]  Dae-Hee Lee,et al.  Bearing Dislocation and Progression of Osteoarthritis After Mobile-bearing Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty Vary Between Asian and Western Patients: A Meta-analysis , 2018, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[8]  T. Bruckner,et al.  The influence of different sets of surgical instrumentation in Oxford UKA on bearing size and component position , 2017, Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery.

[9]  A. Lombardi,et al.  Radiological Decision Aid to determine suitability for medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty , 2016, The bone & joint journal.

[10]  Sakae Tanaka,et al.  Impingement of the Mobile Bearing on the Lateral Wall of the Tibial Tray in Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty. , 2016, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[11]  M. Kim,et al.  Are the Oxford(®) medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty new instruments reducing the bearing dislocation risk while improving components relationships? A case control study. , 2016, Orthopaedics & traumatology, surgery & research : OTSR.

[12]  D W Murray,et al.  The clinical outcome of minimally invasive Phase 3 Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a 15-year follow-up of 1000 UKAs. , 2015, The bone & joint journal.

[13]  Song Lee,et al.  The Survivorship and Clinical Results of Minimally Invasive Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty at 10-Year Follow-up , 2015, Clinics in orthopedic surgery.

[14]  A. Liddle,et al.  Valgus subsidence of the tibial component in cementless Oxford unicompartmental knee replacement , 2014, The bone & joint journal.

[15]  P. W. Kristensen,et al.  Up to 10-year follow-up of the Oxford medial partial knee arthroplasty--695 cases from a single institution. , 2013, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[16]  D. Yang,et al.  Mid-Term Results of Oxford Medial Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty , 2010, Clinics in orthopedic surgery.

[17]  Robert A. Lew,et al.  Design Based on Intra-Class Correlation Coefficients , 2010 .