Comparative parallel characterization of particle populations with two mass spectrometric systems LAMPAS 2 and SPASS

Abstract Two transportable laser mass spectrometers, Single Particle Analysis and Sizing System (SPASS) and Laser Mass Analyzer for Particles in the Airborne State (LAMPAS 2), have been applied to investigate the dependence of spectra patterns on instrumental parameters and data evaluation procedures in an inter-comparison experiment. Laboratory experiments showed the spectral response of both instruments for mineral particles before and after heterogeneous reactions. During a period of 47 h, both instruments determined size and chemical composition of several thousand single particles of an ambient particle population. Time-resolved evaluation (1-h resolution) of specific ion signals, which showed a characteristic temporal evolution, in combination with meteorological information, was used to select four periods for separate evaluation of particle spectra. Application of the two particle classification algorithms, fuzzy c-means clustering and k-means clustering, on the same data set (SPASS) showed only minor differences in spectral patterns and class abundances caused by the clustering method (“soft” or “hard” clustering). Spectral patterns determined for the data sets of two instruments (SPASS and LAMPAS 2) were similar for some particle types and could be compared directly (e.g., mineral or carbonaceous particles). For other types of particles, spectral patterns differed from each other and had to be interpreted using additional information on instrumental parameters (e.g., laser wavelengths or irradiance) and experimental conditions. The different response of SPASS and LAMPAS 2, as reflected in the different abundances of particle classes, indicates the necessity to determine adjustment factors for each instrument, for different particle classes, to enable a direct comparison of quantitative information from such online aerosol mass spectrometers and from bulk analysis. The reported results are an important basis for a general database of single particle spectra, spectral patterns of common and specific particle classes and abundances of these classes for atmospheric aerosols, showing their dependence on particle size, geographic location, meteorological conditions and time of analysis.

[1]  T. Ferge,et al.  Application of single-particle laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry for detection of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons from soot particles originating from an industrial combustion process. , 2003, Rapid communications in mass spectrometry : RCM.

[2]  D. S. Gross,et al.  Relative sensitivity factors for alkali metal and ammonium cations in single-particle aerosol time-of-flight mass spectra. , 2000, Analytical chemistry.

[3]  Daniel M. Murphy,et al.  On-line single-particle analysis by laser desorption mass spectrometry , 1991 .

[4]  B. Morrical,et al.  Real-Time Analysis of Individual Atmospheric Aerosol Particles: Design and Performance of a Portable ATOFMS , 1997 .

[5]  Nanoparticle Detection by Aerosol Mass Spectrometry , 2001 .

[6]  Philip K. Hopke,et al.  Source apportionment of gasoline and diesel by multivariate calibration based on single particle mass spectral data , 2001 .

[7]  K. Prather,et al.  On-Line Characterization of Individual Particles from Automobile Emissions , 1997 .

[8]  K. Prather,et al.  Real-time measurements of the chemical composition of size-resolved particles during a Santa Ana wind episode, California USA , 2001 .

[9]  D. Murphy,et al.  Aerosol characteristics at Idaho Hill during the OH Photochemistry Experiment , 1997 .

[10]  A. Trimborn,et al.  Online Analysis of Atmospheric Particles with a Transportable Laser Mass Spectrometer , 2000 .

[11]  A. Zelenyuk,et al.  Simultaneous determination of individual ambient particle size, hygroscopicity and composition , 2002 .

[12]  A S Wexler,et al.  Application of the ART-2a algorithm to laser ablation aerosol mass spectrometry of particle standards. , 2001, Analytical chemistry.

[13]  Bernhard Spengler,et al.  Simultaneous Detection of Positive and Negative Ions From Single Airborne Particles by Real-time Laser Mass Spectrometry , 1996 .

[14]  L. Reimer,et al.  Scanning Electron Microscopy , 1984 .

[15]  D. S. Gross,et al.  Single Particle Characterization of Automobile and Diesel Truck Emissions in the Caldecott Tunnel , 2000 .

[16]  B. Spengler,et al.  Aerosol single particle composition at the Jungfraujoch , 2005 .

[17]  J. M. Ramsey,et al.  The Elucidation of Charge-Transfer-Induced Matrix Effects in Environmental Aerosols Via Real-Time Aerosol Mass Spectral Analysis of Individual Airborne Particles , 2000 .

[18]  Bernhard Spengler,et al.  Chemical classes of atmospheric aerosol particles at a rural site in Central Europe during winter , 2002 .

[19]  N. Erdmann,et al.  Instrument Characterization and First Application of the Single Particle Analysis and Sizing System (SPASS) for Atmospheric Aerosols , 2005 .

[20]  Towards direct measurement of turbulent vertical fluxes of compounds in atmospheric aerosol particles , 2003 .

[21]  Matthias Frank,et al.  Reagentless detection and classification of individual bioaerosol particles in seconds. , 2004, Analytical chemistry.

[22]  R. Harrison,et al.  Characterization of individual airborne particles by using aerosol time‐of‐flight mass spectrometry at Mace Head, Ireland , 2004 .

[23]  D. Murphy,et al.  Nitrate and oxidized organic ions in single particle mass spectra during the 1999 Atlanta Supersite Project , 2003 .

[24]  J. Goschnick,et al.  Single particle MS, SNMS, SIMS, XPS, and FTIR spectroscopic analysis of soot particles during the AIDA campaign , 2003 .

[25]  Bernhard Spengler,et al.  Data processing in on-line laser mass spectrometry of inorganic, organic, or biological airborne particles , 1999 .

[26]  Laser power dependence of mass spectral signatures from individual bacterial spores in bioaerosol mass spectrometry. , 2003, Analytical chemistry.

[27]  Kenneth A. Smith,et al.  Development of an Aerosol Mass Spectrometer for Size and Composition Analysis of Submicron Particles , 2000 .

[28]  B. Spengler,et al.  Online analysis of atmospheric particles with a transportable laser mass spectrometer during LACE 98 , 2002 .

[29]  Stowers,et al.  Application of matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization to on-line aerosol time-of-flight mass spectrometry , 2000, Rapid communications in mass spectrometry : RCM.

[30]  P. Hopke,et al.  Classification of Single Particles Analyzed by ATOFMS Using an Artificial Neural Network, ART-2A , 1999 .

[31]  D. Murphy,et al.  Cluster Analysis of Data from the Particle Analysis by Laser Mass Spectrometry (PALMS) Instrument , 2003 .

[32]  Ulf Kirchner,et al.  Identification of diesel exhaust particles at an Autobahn, urban and rural location using single-particle mass spectrometry , 2003 .

[33]  J. Seinfeld,et al.  A comparison of particle mass spectrometers during the 1999 Atlanta Supersite Project , 2003 .

[34]  A. Wexler,et al.  Size-resolved ultrafine particle composition analysis, 1. Atlanta , 2003 .