Device-free and device-bound activity recognition using radio signal strength

Background: We investigate direct use of 802.15.4 radio signal strength indication (RSSI) for human activity recognition when 1) a user carries a wireless node (device-bound) and when 2) a user moves in the wireless sensor net (WSN) without a WSN node (device-free). We investigate recognition feasibility in respect to network topology, subject and room geometry (door open, half, closed). Methods: In a 2 person office room 8 wireless nodes are installed in a 3D topology. Two subjects are outfitted with a sensor node on the hip. Acceleration and RSSI are recorded while subject performs 6 different activities or room is empty. We apply machine learning for analysis and compare our results to acceleration data. Results: 10-fold cross-validation with all nodes gives accuracies of 0.896 (device-bound), 0.894 (device-free) and 0.88 (accelerometer). Topology investigation reveals that similar accuracies may be reached with only 5 (device-bound) or 4 (device-free) selected nodes. Applying trained data from one subject to the other and vice-versa shows higher recognition difference on RSSI than on acceleration. Changing of door state has smaller effect on both systems than subject change; with least impact when door is closed. Conclusion: 802.15.4 RSSI suited for activity recognition. 3D topology is helpful in respect to type of activities. Discrimination of subjects seems possible. Practical systems must adapt no only to long-term environmental dispersion but consider typical geometric changes. Adaptable, robust recognition models must be developed.

[1]  Prasant Misra,et al.  Characterization of Asymmetry in Low-Power Wireless Links: An Empirical Study , 2011, ICDCN.

[2]  Neal Patwari,et al.  A Fade-Level Skew-Laplace Signal Strength Model for Device-Free Localization with Wireless Networks , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing.

[3]  M. Beigl,et al.  Challenges for device-free radio-based activity recognition , 2011 .

[4]  J. D. Janssen,et al.  A triaxial accelerometer and portable data processing unit for the assessment of daily physical activity , 1997, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[5]  K. Woyach,et al.  Sensorless Sensing in Wireless Networks: Implementation and Measurements , 2006, 2006 4th International Symposium on Modeling and Optimization in Mobile, Ad Hoc and Wireless Networks.

[6]  Desney S. Tan,et al.  Humantenna: using the body as an antenna for real-time whole-body interaction , 2012, CHI.

[7]  Yusheng Ji,et al.  Activity recognition from radio frequency data: Multi-stage recognition and features , 2012, 2012 IEEE Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC Fall).

[8]  Stephan Sigg,et al.  Situation Awareness Based on Channel Measurements , 2011, 2011 IEEE 73rd Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC Spring).

[9]  Yusheng Ji,et al.  SenseWaves: Radiowaves for context recognition , 2011 .

[10]  Yusheng Ji,et al.  Passive detection of situations from ambient FM-radio signals , 2012, UbiComp.

[11]  Lionel M. Ni,et al.  Dynamic clustering for tracking multiple transceiver-free objects , 2009, 2009 IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communications.

[12]  Ling Bao,et al.  Activity Recognition from User-Annotated Acceleration Data , 2004, Pervasive.

[13]  Neal Patwari,et al.  Spatial Models for Human Motion-Induced Signal Strength Variance on Static Links , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security.

[14]  William G. Griswold,et al.  Mobility Detection Using Everyday GSM Traces , 2006, UbiComp.