Normative Dissonance in Science: Results from a National Survey of U.S. Scientists

Norms of behavior in scientific research represent ideals to which most scientists subscribe. Our analysis of the extent of dissonance between these widely espoused ideals and scientists' perceptions of their own and others' behavior is based on survey responses from 3,247 mid- and early-career scientists who had research funding from the U.S. National Institutes of Health. We found substantial normative dissonance, particularly between espoused ideals and respondents' perceptions of other scientists' typical behavior. Also, respondents on average saw other scientists' behavior as more counternormative than normative. Scientists' views of their fields as cooperative or competitive were associated with their normative perspectives, with competitive fields showing more counternormative behavior. The high levels of normative dissonance documented here represent a persistent source of stress in science.

[1]  Kelly R Risbey,et al.  What Do Mentoring and Training in the Responsible Conduct of Research Have To Do with Scientists’ Misbehavior? Findings from a National Survey of NIH-Funded Scientists , 2007, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.

[2]  Melissa S. Anderson,et al.  Normal Misbehavior: Scientists Talk about the Ethics of Research , 2006, Journal of empirical research on human research ethics : JERHRE.

[3]  Melissa S. Anderson,et al.  Scientists' Perceptions of Organizational Justice and Self-Reported Misbehaviors , 2006, Journal of empirical research on human research ethics : JERHRE.

[4]  Edward P. St. John,et al.  Academic Capitalism and the New Economy: Markets, State, and Higher Education , 2005 .

[5]  K. Okkenhaug,et al.  Integrity in Scientific Research: Creating an Environment that Promotes Responsible Conduct , 2003, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[6]  S. Schwartz.  Faculty Misconduct in Collegiate Teaching , 2003 .

[7]  U. Segerstråle,et al.  Real Science. What it is, and what it means , 2001 .

[8]  Melissa S. Anderson.  Normative orientations of university faculty and doctoral students , 2000, Science and engineering ethics.

[9]  D. Hess,et al.  Science Studies: An Advanced Introduction , 1999 .

[10]  Melissa S. Anderson.  Misconduct and departmental context: Evidence from the Acadia Institute's Graduate Education Project , 1996 .

[11]  C. I. Hovland,et al.  Social Judgment: Assimilation and Contrast Effects in Communication and Attitude Change , 1981 .

[12]  I. Mitroff.  Norms and Counter-Norms in a Select Group of the Apollo Moon Scientists: A Case Study of the Ambivalence of Scientists , 1974 .

[13]  L. Festinger,et al.  A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance , 2017 .

[14]  S. Asch.  Studies of independence and conformity: I. A minority of one against a unanimous majority. , 1956 .

[15]  L. Festinger.  A Theory of Social Comparison Processes , 1954 .

[16]  E. Durkheim.  FROM THE ELEMENTARY FORMS OF THE RELIGIOUS LIFE , 1996, The New Economic Sociology.