Computationally efficient design of directionally compliant metamaterials

Designing mechanical metamaterials is overwhelming for most computational approaches because of the staggering number and complexity of flexible elements that constitute their architecture—particularly if these elements don’t repeat in periodic patterns or collectively occupy irregular bulk shapes. We introduce an approach, inspired by the freedom and constraint topologies (FACT) methodology, that leverages simplified assumptions to enable the design of such materials with ~6 orders of magnitude greater computational efficiency than other approaches (e.g., topology optimization). Metamaterials designed using this approach are called directionally compliant metamaterials (DCMs) because they manifest prescribed compliant directions while possessing high stiffness in all other directions. Since their compliant directions are governed by both macroscale shape and microscale architecture, DCMs can be engineered with the necessary design freedom to facilitate arbitrary form and unprecedented anisotropy. Thus, DCMs show promise as irregularly shaped flexure bearings, compliant prosthetics, morphing structures, and soft robots.Designing mechanical metamaterials is challenging because of the large number of non-periodic constituent elements. Here, the authors develop an approach to design arbitrarily shaped metamaterials that is more computationally efficient by six orders of magnitude compared to other approaches.

[1]  Joseph Duffy,et al.  Classification of screw systems—I. One- and two-systems , 1992 .

[2]  Jean-Pierre Merlet Singular Configurations of Parallel Manipulators and Grassmann Geometry , 1989, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[3]  Jonathan B. Hopkins,et al.  Designing Microstructural Architectures With Thermally Actuated Properties Using Freedom, Actuation, and Constraint Topologies , 2013 .

[4]  Jonathan B. Hopkins,et al.  Modeling and generating parallel flexure elements , 2014 .

[5]  Jonathan B. Hopkins,et al.  Synthesis of precision serial flexure systems using freedom and constraint topologies (FACT) , 2011 .

[6]  D. Holdstock Past, present--and future? , 2005, Medicine, conflict, and survival.

[7]  Jonathan B. Hopkins,et al.  Design of parallel flexure systems via Freedom and Constraint Topologies (FACT) , 2007 .

[8]  M. Ashby,et al.  Micro-architectured materials: past, present and future , 2010, Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[9]  Jack Phillips,et al.  Freedom in machinery , 1984 .

[10]  Stuart T. Smith,et al.  Flexures: Elements of Elastic Mechanisms , 2000 .

[11]  Yuanping Song,et al.  Optimal Actuation of Dynamically Driven Serial and Hybrid Flexure Systems , 2014 .

[12]  Hans-Peter Seidel,et al.  An efficient construction of reduced deformable objects , 2013, ACM Trans. Graph..

[13]  K. H. Hunt,et al.  Geometry of screw systems1Screws: Genesis and geometry , 1990 .

[14]  Joseph Duffy,et al.  Classification of screw systems—II. Three-systems , 1992 .

[15]  G. Farquar,et al.  Design of Nonperiodic Microarchitectured Materials That Achieve Graded Thermal Expansions , 2016 .

[16]  K. H. Hunt,et al.  Geometry of screw systems—2: classification of screw systems , 1990 .

[17]  Jonathan B. Hopkins,et al.  Designing hybrid flexure systems and elements using Freedom and Constraint Topologies , 2013 .

[18]  Markus H. Gross,et al.  Computational design of actuated deformable characters , 2013, ACM Trans. Graph..

[19]  Steve Marschner,et al.  Microstructures to control elasticity in 3D printing , 2015, ACM Trans. Graph..

[20]  H. Anton,et al.  Elementary linear algebra : applications version , 2008 .

[21]  Joseph Duffy,et al.  Orthogonal spaces and screw systems , 1992 .

[22]  Martin Wegener,et al.  Three-dimensional mechanical metamaterials with a twist , 2017, Science.

[23]  N. Fang,et al.  Lightweight Mechanical Metamaterials with Tunable Negative Thermal Expansion. , 2016, Physical review letters.

[24]  J. D. Everett A Treatise on the Theory of Screws , 1901, Nature.

[25]  M. Otaduy,et al.  Design and fabrication of materials with desired deformation behavior , 2010, ACM Trans. Graph..

[26]  Jonathan B. Hopkins,et al.  Design of flexure-based motion stages for mechatronic systems via Freedom, Actuation and Constraint Topologies (FACT) , 2010 .

[27]  Roderic S. Lakes,et al.  Negative-Poisson's-Ratio Materials: Auxetic Solids , 2017 .

[28]  Pedro Lopes,et al.  Metamaterial Mechanisms , 2016, UIST.

[29]  Jonathan B. Hopkins,et al.  A Visualization Approach for Analyzing and Synthesizing Serial Flexure Elements , 2015 .

[30]  Shiwei Zhou,et al.  Design of graded two-phase microstructures for tailored elasticity gradients , 2008, Journal of Materials Science.

[31]  Hans-Peter Seidel,et al.  Real-time lens blur effects and focus control , 2010, SIGGRAPH 2010.

[32]  M. Bendsøe,et al.  Topology Optimization: "Theory, Methods, And Applications" , 2011 .

[33]  Martin van Hecke,et al.  Combinatorial design of textured mechanical metamaterials , 2016, Nature.

[34]  C. Barus A treatise on the theory of screws , 1998 .

[35]  Stefan Hengsbach,et al.  High-strength cellular ceramic composites with 3D microarchitecture , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.