Show me your friends and I will tell you what type of person you are: How one's profile, number of friends, and type of friends influence impression formation on social network sites

This experiment examines how far extraversion of the target (self-generated information), extraversion of the target's friends (friends-generated information), and number of friends (system-generated information) influence the perceived popularity, communal orientation, and social attractiveness of the target. The warranting principle states that judgments rely more heavily on other-generated than self-generated information because the former is more immune to manipulation. It is argued that the warranting principle becomes more important when more interpersonal traits have to be judged. In line with the expectations, other-generated information had only weak impact on the popularity judgments. With regard to communal orientation, other-generated information had stronger effects and qualified the effects of self-generated information. Only other-generated information had an impact on perceived social attraction.

[1]  David W. Park,et al.  Interpersonal Effects in Computer-Mediated Interaction , 1994 .

[2]  J. Mccroskey,et al.  The measurement of interpersonal attraction , 1974 .

[3]  Amy J. C. Cuddy,et al.  Fundamental dimensions of social judgment , 2008 .

[4]  Samuel D. Gosling,et al.  Personality Impressions Based on Facebook Profiles , 2007, ICWSM.

[5]  E. Brunswik.  Perception and the Representative Design of Psychological Experiments , 1957 .

[6]  B. Silverstein,et al.  The role of the mass media in promoting a thin standard of bodily attractiveness for women , 1986 .

[7]  S. Gosling,et al.  e-Perceptions : Personality Impressions Based on Personal Websites , 2004 .

[8]  E. Goffman.  The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life , 1959 .

[9]  Laura E. Buffardi,et al.  Narcissism and Social Networking Web Sites , 2008, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[10]  Malcolm R. Parks,et al.  Cues Filtered Out, Cues Filtered In: Computer-Mediated Communication and Relationships , 2002 .

[11]  M. McPherson,et al.  Birds of a Feather: Homophily in Social Networks , 2001 .

[12]  G. Peeters,et al.  Evaluative meanings of adjectives in vitro and in context : some theoretical implications and practical consequences of positive-negative asymmetry and behavioral-adaptive concepts of evaluation , 1992 .

[13]  C. Berger,et al.  SOME EXPLORATIONS IN INITIAL INTERACTION AND BEYOND: TOWARD A DEVELOPMENTAL THEORY OF INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION , 1975 .

[14]  Gerd Gigerenzer,et al.  Vicarious functioning reconsidered: A fast and frugal lens model , 2001 .

[15]  Danah Boyd,et al.  Social Network Sites: Definition, History, and Scholarship , 2007, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[16]  James A. Danowski,et al.  The Faces of Facebookers: Investigating Social Enhancement and Social Compensation Hypotheses; Predicting FacebookTM and Offline Popularity from Sociability and Self-Esteem, and Mapping the Meanings of Popularity with Semantic Networks , 2008, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[17]  Amy Bruckman,et al.  Gender Swapping on the Internet , 1993 .

[18]  M. Coovert,et al.  Revising an Impression of Morality , 1986 .

[19]  Danah Boyd,et al.  Friends, Friendsters, and Top 8: Writing community into being on social network sites , 2006, First Monday.

[20]  Sara Kiesler,et al.  Social psychological aspects of computer-mediated communication , 1984 .

[21]  Paul A. M. Van Lange,et al.  Impression formation and cooperative behavior , 1999 .

[22]  A. Abele,et al.  Agency and communion from the perspective of self versus others. , 2007, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[23]  J. Mccroskey,et al.  THE EFFECT OF INTERACTION BEHAVIOR ON SOURCE CREDIBILITY, HOMOPHILY, AND INTERPERSONAL ATTRACTION , 1974 .

[24]  Bogdan Wojciszke,et al.  Morality and competence in person- and self-perception , 2005 .

[25]  Nicole B. Ellison,et al.  Managing Impressions Online: Self-Presentation Processes in the Online Dating Environment , 2006, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[26]  Richard E. Lucas,et al.  Cross-cultural evidence for the fundamental features of extraversion. , 2000, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[27]  Amy J. C. Cuddy,et al.  Universal dimensions of social cognition: warmth and competence , 2007, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[28]  Gordon B. Moskowitz,et al.  People as Flexible Interpreters: Evidence and Issues from Spontaneous Trait Inference , 1996 .

[29]  S. Srivastava,et al.  The Big Five Trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and theoretical perspectives. , 1999 .

[30]  Bogdan Wojciszke,et al.  On the Dominance of Moral Categories in Impression Formation , 1998 .

[31]  Cliff Lampe,et al.  The Benefits of Facebook "Friends: " Social Capital and College Students' Use of Online Social Network Sites , 2007, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[32]  D. Byrne.  Attitudes and Attraction , 1969 .

[33]  J. Uleman,et al.  Spontaneous versus intentional inferences in impression formation , 1999 .

[34]  N. Anderson.  Averaging versus adding as a stimulus-combination rule in impression formation. , 1965, Journal of experimental psychology.

[35]  N. Anderson,et al.  Application of a linear-serial model to a personality-impression task using serial presentation. , 1968, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[36]  Judith Donath,et al.  Signals in Social Supernets , 2007, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[37]  Patti M. Valkenburg,et al.  Developing a Model of Adolescent Friendship Formation on the Internet , 2005, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[38]  Wayne H. Denton,et al.  A new look at similarity and attraction in marriage: Similarities in social‐cognitive and communication skills as predictors of attraction and satisfaction , 1992 .

[39]  Lee Sproull,et al.  Reducing social context cues: electronic mail in organizational communication , 1986 .

[40]  S. Gosling,et al.  A room with a cue: personality judgments based on offices and bedrooms. , 2002, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[41]  Jaap J. A. Denissen,et al.  In the eye of the beholder: perceived, actual, and peer-rated similarity in personality, communication, and friendship intensity during the acquaintanceship process. , 2009, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[42]  Sara B. Kiesler,et al.  The Equalization Phenomenon: Status Effects in Computer-Mediated and Face-to-Face Decision-Making Groups , 1991, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[43]  Bernd Marcus,et al.  Personality in cyberspace: personal Web sites as media for personality expressions and impressions. , 2006, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[44]  Jeffrey T. Hancock,et al.  Separating Fact From Fiction: An Examination of Deceptive Self-Presentation in Online Dating Profiles , 2008, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[45]  Brandon Van Der Heide,et al.  Self-Generated Versus Other-Generated Statements and Impressions in Computer-Mediated Communication , 2009, Commun. Res..

[46]  P. Costa,et al.  The five-factor theory of personality. , 2008 .

[47]  Donal E. Carlston,et al.  Negativity and extremity biases in impression formation: A review of explanations. , 1989 .

[48]  G. I. Kustova,et al.  From the author , 2019, Automatic Documentation and Mathematical Linguistics.

[49]  Eaaron Henderson-King,et al.  Media Images and Women’s Self-Evaluations: Social Context and Importance of Attractiveness as Moderators , 2001 .

[50]  John J. Skowronski,et al.  Social judgment and social memory: The role of cue diagnosticity in negativity, positivity, and extremity biases. , 1987 .

[51]  Marian M. Morry,et al.  Relationship satisfaction as a predictor of similarity ratings: A test of the attraction-similarity hypothesis , 2005 .

[52]  Stephanie Tom Tong,et al.  The Role of Friends’ Appearance and Behavior on Evaluations of Individuals on Facebook: Are We Known by the Company We Keep? , 2008 .

[53]  Judith Donath,et al.  Public Displays of Connection , 2004 .

[54]  N. Anderson.  Application of an Additive Model to Impression Formation , 1962, Science.

[55]  Susan K. Egan,et al.  Agreeableness, extraversion, and peer relations in early adolescence: Winning friends and deflecting aggression , 2002 .

[56]  B. Cornwell,et al.  Love on the Internet: involvement and misrepresentation in romantic relationships in cyberspace vs. realspace , 2001, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[57]  Brandon Van Der Heide,et al.  Too Much of a Good Thing? The Relationship Between Number of Friends and Interpersonal Impressions on Facebook , 2008, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..