Neural networks predict response biases of female túngara frogs
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] T. Guilford,et al. Receiver psychology and the evolution of animal signals , 1991, Animal Behaviour.
[2] M. West-Eberhard. Sexual selection, social competition and evolution , 1979 .
[3] A. Plaisant. Long range acoustic communications , 1998, IEEE Oceanic Engineering Society. OCEANS'98. Conference Proceedings (Cat. No.98CH36259).
[4] W. F. Blair. Isolating Mechanisms and Interspecies Interactions in Anuran Amphibians , 1964, The Quarterly Review of Biology.
[5] A. Basolo. Female Preference Predates the Evolution of the Sword in Swordtail Fish , 1990, Science.
[6] M. Ryan,et al. Sexual selection for sensory exploitation in the frog Physalaemus pustulosus , 1990, Nature.
[7] M. Enquist,et al. Darwin’s principle of antithesis revisited: a role for perceptual biases in the evolution of intraspecific signals , 1995, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.
[8] M. J. Littlejohn. Long-Range Acoustic Communication in Anurans: An Integrated and Evolutionary Approach , 1977 .
[9] Jeffrey L. Elman,et al. Finding Structure in Time , 1990, Cogn. Sci..
[10] M. Enquist,et al. Hidden preferences and the evolution of signals , 1993 .
[11] M. Ryan,et al. SPECIES RECOGNITION AND SEXUAL SELECTION AS A UNITARY PROBLEM IN ANIMAL COMMUNICATION , 1993, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.
[12] Richard P. Lippmann,et al. Review of Neural Networks for Speech Recognition , 1989, Neural Computation.
[13] M. Ryan,et al. Neuroanatomy influences speciation rates among anurans. , 1986, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[14] David E. Goldberg,et al. SGA-C: A C-language Implementation of a Simple Genetic Algorithm , 1991 .
[15] R. Dawkins,et al. Animal signals: information or manipulation? , 1978 .
[16] Consistency of female choice in the túngara frog: a permissive preference for complex characters , 1998, Animal Behaviour.
[17] R. Johnstone. Female preference for symmetrical males as a by-product of selection for mate recognition , 1994, Nature.
[18] Gil G. Rosenthal,et al. Symmetry without fear , 1994, Nature.
[19] Fred E. Inbau,et al. Truth and Deception , 1966 .
[20] M. Ryan. Sexual selection, sensory systems and sensory exploitation. , 1990 .
[21] J J Hopfield,et al. Neural computation by concentrating information in time. , 1987, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[22] Magnus Enquist,et al. Symmetry, beauty and evolution , 1994, Nature.
[23] M. Ryan,et al. Female Responses to Ancestral Advertisement Calls in T�ngara Frogs , 1995, Science.
[24] T. Guilford,et al. An exaggerated preference for simple neural network models of signal evolution? , 1995, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.
[25] M. Enquist,et al. Selection of exaggerated male traits by female aesthetic senses , 1993, Nature.
[26] J. Endler. Signals, Signal Conditions, and the Direction of Evolution , 1992, The American Naturalist.