Initial Fixation Location Effects in Reading Hebrew Words

Three experiments examined initial fixation position effects for Hebrew readers. In English, the preferred viewing location (where readers' eyes initially land in a word) is to the left of the centre of words, and words presented in isolation are identified more easily when the initial fixation point is near the optimal viewing location (close to the centre of the word). In Experiment 1, we found that the preferred viewing location for Hebrew readers was to the right of the centre of words and that it was not modulated by inflectional morphological constraints. However, the results from the word identification task in Experiments 2 and 3 indicated that derivational morphological constraints do modulate the optimal viewing location.

[1]  A. Jacobs,et al.  Optimal viewing position effect in word recognition: A challenge to current theory. , 1992 .

[2]  K. Rayner,et al.  Mindless reading revisited: Eye movements during reading and scanning are different , 1996, Perception & psychophysics.

[3]  F. Vitu,et al.  The influence of parafoveal preprocessing and linguistic context on the optimal landing position effect , 1991, Perception & psychophysics.

[4]  Alexander Pollatsek,et al.  Asymmetries in the perceptual span for Israeli readers , 1981, Brain and Language.

[5]  Miriam Faust,et al.  Lexical decision and visual hemifield: An examination of the RT—Accuracy relationship , 1988, Neuropsychologia.

[6]  R. E. Morrison,et al.  Manipulation of stimulus onset delay in reading: evidence for parallel programming of saccades. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[7]  Alexander Pollatsek,et al.  Unspaced text interferes with both word identification and eye movement control , 1998, Vision Research.

[8]  W. Marslen-Wilson,et al.  Morphological priming: Dissociation of phonological, semantic, and morphological factors , 2000, Memory & cognition.

[9]  G Underwood,et al.  Reading long words embedded in sentences: informativeness of word halves affects eye movements. , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[10]  Gary E. Raney,et al.  Eye movement control in reading: a comparison of two types of models. , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[11]  I. Nachshon,et al.  Developmental aspects of visual hemifield differences in perception of verbal material , 1976, Brain and Language.

[12]  K. Forster,et al.  Verbs and nouns are organized and accessed differently in the mental lexicon: evidence from Hebrew. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[13]  P. W. Kerr,et al.  Eye movement control during reading: I. The location of initial eye fixations on words , 1987, Vision Research.

[14]  Jukka Hyönä,et al.  Do irregular letter combinations attract readers' attention? Evidence from fixation locations in words. , 1995 .

[15]  S. Kravetz,et al.  Hemispheric Specialization or Reading Habits: Evidence from Lexical Decision Research with Hebrew Words and Sentences , 1993, Brain and Language.

[16]  E. Zaidel,et al.  Language and Task Effects on Lateralized Word Recognition , 1993, Brain and Language.

[17]  Geoffrey Underwood,et al.  Parafoveal guidance and priming effects during reading: A special case of the mind being ahead of the eyes , 1992, Consciousness and Cognition.

[18]  C. Beauvillain,et al.  Latency dependence of word-initial letter integration by the saccadic system , 1997, Perception & psychophysics.

[19]  M. Albert,et al.  Shift of visual field preference for English words in native Hebrew speakers , 1979, Brain and Language.

[20]  Arthur M. Jacobs,et al.  On words and their letters , 1991 .

[21]  J. O'Regan,et al.  Mindless reading: Eye-movement characteristics are similar in scanning letter strings and reading texts , 1995, Perception & psychophysics.

[22]  K. Rayner.  Eye Guidance in Reading: Fixation Locations within Words , 1979, Perception.

[23]  M. Bryden,et al.  Locus of information in words and the right visual field effect , 1990, Brain and Cognition.

[24]  J. O'Regan.  Optimal Viewing Position in Words and the Strategy-Tactics Theory of Eye Movements in Reading , 1992 .

[25]  Raymond Dodge.  Recent studies in the correlation of eye movement and visual perception. , 1906 .

[26]  Marc Brysbaert,et al.  The Right Visual Field Advantage and the Optimal Viewing Position Effect : On the Relation Between Foveal and Parafoveal Word Recognition , 1996 .

[27]  Robin K. Morris,et al.  Eye movement control in reading: evidence against semantic preprocessing. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[28]  M D Reddix,et al.  Eye movement control during reading: II. Frequency of refixating a word , 1989, Perception & psychophysics.

[29]  G Underwood,et al.  Information Influences the Pattern of Eye Fixations during Sentence Comprehension , 1988, Perception.

[30]  P. Dunn‐Rankin,et al.  The visual characteristics of words. , 1978, Scientific American.

[31]  A. Pollatsek,et al.  Reading Finnish compound words: eye fixations are affected by component morphemes. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[32]  K. Rayner,et al.  Asymmetry of the effective visual field in reading , 1980, Perception & psychophysics.

[33]  M. Bryden.  On the possible dangers of using horizontal word displays in visual field studies , 1986, Brain and Cognition.

[34]  Cécile Beauvillain,et al.  Orthographic codes are used in integrating information from the parafovea by the saccadic computation system , 1998, Vision Research.

[35]  J. Pynte,et al.  Lexical control of within-word eye movements. , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[36]  Jonathan Grainger,et al.  How Initial Fixation Position Influences Visual Word Recognition: A Comparison of French and Arabic , 1996, Brain and Language.

[37]  Karine Doré,et al.  The ‘center of gravity’ of words: Evidence for an effect of the word-initial letters , 1996, Vision Research.

[38]  T. Nazir,et al.  Letter visibility and word recognition: The optimal viewing position in printed words , 1992, Perception & psychophysics.

[39]  C. Beauvillain,et al.  The Integration of Morphological and Whole-Word Form Information during Eye Fixations on Prefixed and Suffixed Words ☆ , 1996 .

[40]  J. O'Regan,et al.  Optimal landing position in reading isolated words and continuous text , 1990, Perception & psychophysics.

[41]  C. Barry.  Hemispheric asymmetry in lexical access and phonological encoding , 1981, Neuropsychologia.

[42]  G Underwood,et al.  How Do Readers Know Where to Look Next? Local Information Distributions Influence Eye Fixations , 1990, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[43]  A Koriat,et al.  Lateralization effects in reading pointed and unpointed Hebrew. , 1985, British journal of psychology.

[44]  K. Forster,et al.  What can we learn from the morphology of Hebrew? A masked-priming investigation of morphological representation. , 1997, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[45]  A. Inhoff,et al.  Compound word effects differ in reading, on-line naming, and delayed naming tasks , 1996, Memory & cognition.

[46]  A. Jacobs,et al.  Neighborhood frequency effects and letter visibility in visual word recognition , 1992, Perception & psychophysics.

[47]  A. Broerse,et al.  The information value of initial letters in the identification of words , 1966 .

[48]  G. McConkie,et al.  The span of the effective stimulus during a fixation in reading , 1975 .

[49]  H. Babkoff,et al.  Lexical Decision Time as a Function of Visual Field and Stimulus Probability , 1983, Cortex.