A necessary condition for the widely used additive value function is total preferential independence, or somewhat equivalently, total substitutability among the decision criteria. We consider cases where total substitutability is absent, and study the value functions that are applicable to such cases. First we take the case of total nonsubstitutability, and prove that the maximin value function is appropriate for it. This result easily extends to the closely related maximax value function. Next we consider the case where there is neither total substitutability nor total nonsubstitutability, and show how a minsum value function can be applicable. A minsum function is one that uses only addition and minimum extraction operations. We explain how the structure of a minsum function can be inferred from substitutability information. In the process, we encounter certain subsets of criteria which we call chains and cuts.
[1]
John A. Weymark,et al.
Social Choice with Interpersonal Utility Comparisons: A Diagrammatic Introduction
,
1984
.
[2]
W. Edwards,et al.
Decision Analysis and Behavioral Research
,
1986
.
[3]
T. Rader,et al.
The Existence of a Utility Function to Represent Preferences
,
1963
.
[4]
R. L. Keeney,et al.
Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Trade-Offs
,
1977,
IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.
[5]
Z. Birnbaum,et al.
Multi-Component Systems and Structures and Their Reliability
,
1961
.
[6]
P. Farquhar.
Interdependent Criteria in Utility Analysis
,
1978
.
[7]
D. R. Fulkerson.
NETWORKS, FRAMES, BLOCKING SYSTEMS
,
1967
.
[8]
G. Debreu.
Topological Methods in Cardinal Utility Theory
,
1959
.