This Time It's Personal: from PIM to the Perfect Digital Assistant

Interacting with digital PIM tools like calendars, to-do lists, address books, bookmarks and so on, is a highly manual, often repetitive and frequently tedious process. Despite increases in memory and processor power over the past two decades of personal computing, not much has changed in the way we engage with such applications. We must still manually decompose frequently performed tasks into multiple smaller, data specific processes if we want to be able to recall or reuse the information in some meaningful way. "Meeting with Yves at 5 in Stata about blah" breaks down into rigid, fixed semantics in separate applications: data to be recorded in calendar fields, address book fields and, as for the blah, something that does not necessarily exist as a PIM application data structure. We argue that a reason Personal Information Management tools may be so manual, and so effectively fragmented, is that they are not personal enough. If our information systems were more personal, that is, if they knew in a manner similar to the way a personal assistant would know us and support us, then our tools would be more helpful: an assistive PIM tool would gather together the necessary material in support of our meeting with Yves. We, therefore, have been investigating the possible paths towards PIM tools as tools that work for us, rather than tools that seemingly make us work for them. To that end, in the following sections we consider how we may develop a framework for PIM tools as "perfect digital assistants" (PDA). Our impetus has been to explore how, by considering the affordances of a Real World personal assistant, we can conceptualize a design framework, and from there a development program for a digital simulacrum of such an assistant that is not for some far off future, but for the much nearer term.

[1]  Michael G. Lamming,et al.  Activity-based Information Retrieval: Technology in Support of Personal Memory , 1992, IFIP Congress.

[2]  Gordon Bell,et al.  MyLifeBits: fulfilling the Memex vision , 2002, MULTIMEDIA '02.

[3]  Thomas G. Dietterich,et al.  The TaskTracer system , 2005, AAAI 2005.

[4]  Michael S. Bernstein,et al.  Gui --- phooey!: the case for text input , 2007, UIST.

[5]  Margery Eldridge,et al.  PEPYS: Generating Autobiographies by Automatic Tracking , 1991, ECSCW.

[6]  Louis-Philippe Morency,et al.  The effect of head-nod recognition in human-robot conversation , 2006, HRI '06.

[7]  Eric Horvitz,et al.  Principles of mixed-initiative user interfaces , 1999, CHI '99.

[8]  Michael S. Bernstein,et al.  Management of personal information scraps , 2007, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[9]  Henry Lieberman,et al.  Watch what I do: programming by demonstration , 1993 .

[10]  David R. Karger,et al.  Haystack: per-user information environments , 1999, CIKM '99.

[11]  Blair MacIntyre,et al.  Support for multitasking and background awareness using interactive peripheral displays , 2001, UIST '01.

[12]  Max Van Kleek,et al.  A Practical Activity Capture Framework for Personal, Lifetime User Modeling , 2007, User Modeling.

[13]  Susan T. Dumais,et al.  Fast, Flexible Filtering with Phlat — Personal Search and Organization Made Easy , 2006 .

[14]  Thad Starner,et al.  Learning Significant Locations and Predicting User Movement with GPS , 2002, Proceedings. Sixth International Symposium on Wearable Computers,.

[15]  Hao Yan,et al.  More than just a pretty face: affordances of embodiment , 2000, IUI '00.

[16]  Michael S. Bernstein,et al.  Information ! Scraps : ! ! How ! and ! Why ! Information ! Eludes ! our ! Personal ! Information ! Management , 2022 .

[17]  Jakob E. Bardram,et al.  Support for activity-based computing in a personal computing operating system , 2006, CHI.

[18]  Susan T. Dumais,et al.  Personalizing Search via Automated Analysis of Interests and Activities , 2005, SIGIR.