HISTORY AND CURRENT DEVELOPMENT OF A PARADIGM OF PREDATION IN ROCKY INTERTIDAL COMMUNITIES

A paradigm is a set of mutually supportive hypotheses that provides a frame of reference within a field. In 1962, Kuhn proposed that paradigms form within the dual contexts of empirical evidence and intellectual history. Facts potentially contradictory to a paradigm may not be recognized until they are observed repeatedly and incorporated as supportive evidence into a new theory. Support for this interpretation can be found in the history of a paradigm of predation in rocky intertidal communities. Hypotheses were developed in the contexts of innovative field experiments and historical arguments of competition theory. The resulting paradigm proposed that predators restrict populations of competitively dominant prey to refuges. Different types of refuge, or no refuge, prevail in different areas of the intertidal zone, accounting for patterns of prey distribution, the coexistence of natural enemies, and the local maintenance of diversity. An ensuing period of criticism made reference to potential contradictions. Rather than by predation alone, prey abundances are determined largely by an interplay of varying rates of predation and prey production. Furthermore, prey refuges are neither necessary nor sufficient to explain all observed instances of local coexistence of predators and prey. We present a model in which intertidal boundaries of prey are set by equilibria between predation and prey production. Predation and prey productivity vary with environmental gradients and with explicit spatial configurations of the prey. This synthesis relies on insights of the original paradigm, incorporates the contradictory observations, and depends on novel capabilities afforded by spatially explicit computer simulations. The resulting synthesis provides explanations for distinctive aspects of zonation, including abrupt prey boundaries in continuous gradients of predation, and converging upper and lower prey boundaries in gradients of decreasing wave exposure.

[1]  Thomas Park,et al.  Experimental Studies of Interspecies Competition II. Temperature, Humidity, and Competition in Two Species of Tribolium , 1954, Physiological Zoology.

[2]  P. Morin Predation, Competition, and the Composition of Larval Anuran Guilds , 1983 .

[3]  Yoh Iwasa,et al.  Demographic Theory for an Open Marine Population with Space-Limited Recruitment , 1985 .

[4]  F. Egerton Changing Concepts of the Balance of Nature , 1973, The Quarterly Review of Biology.

[5]  M. Turner,et al.  LANDSCAPE ECOLOGY : The Effect of Pattern on Process 1 , 2002 .

[6]  R. Castenholz The Effect of Grazing on Marine Littoral Diatom Populations , 1961 .

[7]  E. Burrows,et al.  Autecology and the species problem in Fucus , 1951, Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom.

[8]  Terry P. Hughes,et al.  RECRUITMENT AND THE LOCAL DYNAMICS OF OPEN MARINE POPULATIONS , 1996 .

[9]  William W. Murdoch,et al.  POPULATION REGULATION IN THEORY AND PRACTICE , 1994 .

[10]  H. G. Andrewartha,et al.  The distribution and abundance of animals. , 1954 .

[11]  P. Dayton Competition, Disturbance, and Community Organization: The Provision and Subsequent Utilization of Space in a Rocky Intertidal Community , 1971 .

[12]  P. Hockey,et al.  The Influence of Primary Production Rate on the Population Dynamics of Patella granulans, an Intertidal Limpet , 1988 .

[13]  J. Lubchenco,et al.  Community Organization in Temperate and Tropical Rocky Intertidal Habitats: Prey Refuges in Relation to Consumer Pressure Gradients , 1981 .

[14]  B. Menge,et al.  Competition for Food between Two Intertidal Starfish Species and its Effect on Body Size and Feeding , 1972 .

[15]  R. Paine,et al.  Size-Limited Predation: An Observational and Experimental Approach with the Mytilus-Pisaster Interaction , 1976 .

[16]  J. H. Petersen ESTABLISHMENT OF MUSSEL BEDS - ATTACHMENT BEHAVIOR AND DISTRIBUTION OF RECENTLY SETTLED MUSSELS (MYTILUS-CALIFORNIANUS) , 1984 .

[17]  J. Wiens,et al.  Perspectives in ornithology: Avian community ecology: an iconoclastic view , 1983 .

[18]  Thomas Park,et al.  Interspecies Competition in Populations of Trilobium confusum Duval and Trilobium castaneum Herbst , 1948 .

[19]  B. Menge,et al.  Top-down and bottom-up community regulation in marine rocky intertidal habitats. , 2000, Journal of experimental marine biology and ecology.

[20]  Joseph H. Connell,et al.  A Predator‐Prey System in the Marine Intertidal Region. I. Balanus glandula and Several Predatory Species of Thais , 1970 .

[21]  P. Petraitis,et al.  The Maintenance of Species Diversity by Disturbance , 1989, The Quarterly Review of Biology.

[22]  J. Kitching Ecological studies at Lough Hyne , 1987 .

[23]  Stephen J. Hawkins,et al.  Modelling patch dynamics on rocky shores using deterministic cellular automata , 2022 .

[24]  Joseph H. Connell,et al.  Effects of Competition, Predation by Thais lapillus, and Other Factors on Natural Populations of the Barnacle Balanus balanoides , 1961 .

[25]  R. Livingston,et al.  Ecological Processes in Coastal and Marine Systems. , 1980 .

[26]  D. Sweetnam,et al.  Lobster Predation on Mussels: Shore-Level Differences in Prey Vulnerability and Predator Preference , 1990 .

[27]  J. Connell The Influence of Interspecific Competition and Other Factors on the Distribution of the Barnacle Chthamalus Stellatus , 1961 .

[28]  J. Pawlik Chemical ecology of the settlement of benthic marine invertebrates , 1992 .

[29]  R. Paine Food webs : linkage, interaction strength and community infrastructure , 1980 .

[30]  B. Menge,et al.  Indirect Effects in Marine Rocky Intertidal Interaction Webs: Patterns and Importance , 1995 .

[31]  C. M. Young Novelty of "supply-side ecology". , 1987, Science.

[32]  R. Lewin Supply-Side Ecology: Existing models of population structure and dynamics of ecological communities have tended to ignore the effect of the influx of new members into the communities. , 1986, Science.

[33]  B. Menge Predation intensity in a rocky intertidal community , 2004, Oecologia.

[34]  M. Ba,et al.  Influence of phytoplankton concentration and wave exposure on the ecophysiology of Mytilus californianus , 1996 .

[35]  Andrew D. Taylor Metapopulations, Dispersal, and Predator‐Prey Dynamics: An Overview , 1990 .

[36]  E. Berlow,et al.  The Keystone Species Concept: Variation in Interaction Strength in a Rocky Intertidal Habitat , 1994 .

[37]  G. F. Gause The struggle for existence , 1971 .

[38]  P. Dayton,et al.  ON THE EVOLUTION OF ECOLOGICAL IDEAS: PARADIGMS AND SCIENTIFIC PROGRESS , 2002 .

[39]  C. Robles,et al.  Varied carnivore effects and the prevalence of intertidal algal turfs , 1993 .

[40]  Y. Iwasa,et al.  Dynamics and Evolution of Marine Populations with Pelagic Larval Dispersal , 1984 .

[41]  G B Ermentrout,et al.  Cellular automata approaches to biological modeling. , 1993, Journal of theoretical biology.

[42]  A. J. Underwood,et al.  A refutation of critical tidal levels as determinants of the structure of intertidal communities on British shores , 1978 .

[43]  Raymond B. Seed,et al.  Population and community ecol-ogy of Mytilus , 1992 .

[44]  Optimal Choice in Animals , 1968, The American Naturalist.

[45]  C. Robles Changing recruitment in constant species assemblages: implications for predation theory in intertidal communities , 1997 .

[46]  B. Menge,et al.  Benthic-pelagic links and rocky intertidal communities: bottom-up effects on top-down control? , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[47]  J. Connell The consequences of variation in initial settlement vs. post-settlement mortality in rocky intertidal communities , 1985 .

[48]  Simon A. Levin,et al.  Fragile Dominion: Complexity and the Commons , 1999 .

[49]  Harry Hatton Essais de bionomie explicative sur quelques espèces intercotidales d'algues et d'animaux ... , 1938 .

[50]  J. Timothy Wootton,et al.  Local interactions predict large-scale pattern in empirically derived cellular automata , 2001, Nature.

[51]  W. Sousa Disturbance in Marine Intertidal Boulder Fields: The Nonequilibrium Maintenance of Species Diversity , 1979 .

[52]  B. Danielson,et al.  Spatially Explicit Population Models: Current Forms and Future Uses , 1995 .

[53]  N Wade,et al.  Thomas s. Kuhn: revolutionary theorist of science. , 1977, Science.

[54]  T. Kuhn,et al.  The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. , 1964 .

[55]  K. Iwasaki Distribution and bed structure of the two intertidal mussels, Septifer virgatus (Wiegmann) and Hormomya mutabilis (Gould) , 1994 .

[56]  A. Chapman Functional ecology of fucoid algae: twenty-three years of progress , 1995 .

[57]  P. Fairweather,et al.  Supply-side ecology and benthic marine assemblages. , 1989, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[58]  T. A. Stephenson,et al.  The universal features of zonation between tide-marks on rocky coasts , 1949 .

[59]  R. Harger Competitive Coexistence among Intertidal Invertebrates , 1972 .

[60]  B. Menge Components of predation intensity in the low zone of the New England rocky intertidal region , 1983, Oecologia.

[61]  Stoner B. Haven Competition for Food Between the Intertidal Gastropods Acmaea Scabra and Acmaea Digitalis , 1973 .

[62]  Patrick J. Mulholland,et al.  Top‐Down and Bottom‐Up Control of Stream Periphyton: Effects of Nutrients and Herbivores , 1993 .

[63]  A. C. Crombie On competition between different species of graminivorous insects , 1945, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B - Biological Sciences.

[64]  Ivan Valiela,et al.  Marine Ecological Processes , 1984, Springer Advanced Texts in Life Sciences.

[65]  J. Wootton,et al.  The Nature and Consequences of Indirect Effects in Ecological Communities , 1994 .

[66]  R. Macarthur,et al.  The Limiting Similarity, Convergence, and Divergence of Coexisting Species , 1967, The American Naturalist.

[67]  J. Connell Diversity in tropical rain forests and coral reefs. , 1978, Science.

[68]  R. Paine,et al.  Perturbation and Recovery Patterns of Starfish-Dominated Intertidal Assemblages in Chile, New Zealand, and Washington State , 1985, The American Naturalist.

[69]  R. Grosberg,et al.  For adults only? Supply-side ecology and the history of larval biology. , 1992, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[70]  Peter Kareiva,et al.  Spatial ecology : the role of space in population dynamics and interspecific interactions , 1998 .

[71]  T. Malthus An essay on the principle of population, as it affects the future improvement of society , 2006 .

[72]  J. Roughgarden,et al.  Recruitment dynamics in complex life cycles. , 1988, Science.

[73]  P. Dayton,et al.  Ecology: A Science and a Religion , 1979 .

[74]  A. Underwood,et al.  11. Paradigms, Explanations, and Generalizations in Models for the Structure of Intertidal Communities on Rocky Shores , 1984 .

[75]  Donald R. Strong,et al.  Natural Variability and the Manifold Mechanisms of Ecological Communities , 1983, The American Naturalist.

[76]  M. Gilpin,et al.  Perturbation Experiments in Community Ecology: Theory and Practice , 1984 .

[77]  J. Colman The Nature of the Intertidal Zonation of Plants and Animals , 1933, Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom.

[78]  R. P. McIntosh Pluralism in Ecology , 1987 .

[79]  John R. Lewis,et al.  The ecology of rocky shores , 1964 .

[80]  S. Pacala,et al.  POPULATION REGULATION: HISTORICAL CONTEXT AND CONTEMPORARY CHALLENGES OF OPEN VS. CLOSED SYSTEMS , 2002 .

[81]  W. Sousa The Role of Disturbance in Natural Communities , 1984 .

[82]  Jane Lubchenco Menge Prey selection and foraging period of the predaceous rocky intertidal snail, Acanthina punctulata , 1974, Oecologia.

[83]  J. Roughgarden,et al.  Larval settlement rate: A leading determinant of structure in an ecological community of the marine intertidal zone. , 1985, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[84]  J. Stimson The Role of the Territory in the Ecology of the Intertidal Limpet Lottia Gigantea (Gray) , 1973 .

[85]  R. Paine,et al.  Wave energy and intertidal productivity. , 1987, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[86]  C. Robles,et al.  Responses of a Key Intertidal Predator to Varying Recruitment of Its Prey , 1995 .

[87]  M. Doty Critical Tide Factors that are Correlated with the Vertical Distribution of Marine Algae and Other Organisms along the Pacific Coast , 1946 .

[88]  P. Hockey,et al.  Life-history patterns of populations of the limpet Patella granularis: the dominant roles of food supply and mortality rate , 1988, Oecologia.

[89]  B. Menge,et al.  Rocky intertidal oceanography: An association between community structure and nearshore phytoplankton concentration , 1997 .

[90]  Joseph H. Connell,et al.  Community Interactions on Marine Rocky Intertidal Shores , 1972 .

[91]  R. Macarthur,et al.  Population Ecology of Some Warblers of Northeastern Coniferous Forests , 1958 .

[92]  J. Lawton,et al.  Declining biodiversity can alter the performance of ecosystems , 1994, Nature.

[93]  S. Mcgrorty,et al.  Population dynamics of the mussel Mytilus edulis along environmental gradients: spatial variations in density-dependent mortalities , 1993 .

[94]  T. Wolcott,et al.  PHYSIOLOGICAL ECOLOGY AND INTERTIDAL ZONATION IN LIMPETS (ACMAEA): A CRITICAL LOOK AT "LIMITING FACTORS" , 1973 .

[95]  R. Paine,et al.  The Pisaster-Tegula Interaction: Prey Patches, Predator Food Preference, and Intertidal Community Structure , 1969 .

[96]  P. Doherty Tropical Territorial Damselfishses: Is Density Limited by Aggression or Recruitment? , 1983 .

[97]  B. Victor Recruitment and Population Dynamics of a Coral Reef Fish , 1983, Science.

[98]  L. Birch,et al.  Experimental Background to the Study of the Distribution and Abundance of Insects: I. The Influence of Temperature, Moisture and Food on the Innate Capacity for Increase of Three Grain Beetles , 1953 .

[99]  T. Hughes,et al.  Recruitment Limitation, Mortality, and Population Regulation in Open Systems: A Case Study , 1990 .

[100]  J. Connell Chapter 2 – Ecology: Field Experiments in Marine Ecology , 1974 .

[101]  C. Robles Predator Foraging Characteristics and Prey Population Structure on a Sheltered Shore. , 1987, Ecology.

[102]  K. Tenore,et al.  Marine Benthic Dynamics , 1980 .

[103]  J. H. Petersen Larval settlement behavior in competing species: Mytiluscalifornianus Conrad and M. edulis L. , 1984 .

[104]  R. Paine Food Web Complexity and Species Diversity , 1966, The American Naturalist.

[105]  J. Kitching,et al.  The Ecology of Lough Ine: VIII. Mussels and Their Predators , 1959 .

[106]  A. Kohn DIVERSITY, UTILIZATION OF RESOURCES, AND ADAPTIVE RADIATION IN SPIALLOW‐WATER MARINE INVERTEBRATES OF TROPICAL OCEANIC ISLANDS1 , 1971 .

[107]  T. Reusch,et al.  PERSISTENCE AND SPACE OCCUPANCY BY SUBTIDALBLUE MUSSEL PATCHES , 1997 .

[108]  Jane Lubchenco,et al.  Algal Zonation in the New England Rocky Intertidal Community: An Experimental Analysis , 1980 .

[109]  J. Castilla,et al.  Human exclusion from the rocky intertidal zone of central Chile: the effects on Concholepas concholepas (Gastropoda) , 1985 .

[110]  Alan Hastings,et al.  Spatial heterogeneity and ecological models , 1990 .

[111]  C. Huffaker Experimental studies on predation : dispersion factors and predator-prey oscillations , 1958 .

[112]  J. D. Reeve Stability, Variability, and Persistence in Host‐Parasitoid Systems , 1990 .

[113]  Donald R. Strong,et al.  ARE TROPHIC CASCADES ALL WET? DIFFERENTIATION AND DONOR-CONTROL IN SPECIOSE ECOSYSTEMS' , 1992 .

[114]  R. Holt Predation, apparent competition, and the structure of prey communities. , 1977, Theoretical population biology.

[115]  L. Birch,et al.  EXPERIMENTAL BACKGROUND TO THE STUDY OF THE DISTRIBUTION AND ABUNDANCE OF INSECTS: III. The relation between innate capacity for increase and survival of different species of beetles living together on the same food , 1953 .

[116]  W. Wilson,et al.  Abrupt population changes along smooth environmental gradients , 1996 .

[117]  R. Paine,et al.  Intertidal Landscapes: Disturbance and the Dynamics of Pattern , 1981 .

[118]  J. Stimson Territorial Behavior of the Owl Limpet, Lottia Gigantea , 1970 .

[119]  J. Roughgarden,et al.  Spatial variation in larval concentrations as a cause of spatial variation in settlement for the barnacle, Balanus glandula , 1985, Oecologia.

[120]  D. Strong 3. Exorcising the Ghost of Competition Past: Phytophagous Insects , 1984 .

[121]  S. Gaines,et al.  Fish in Offshore Kelp Forests Affect Recruitment to Intertidal Barnacle Populations , 1987, Science.

[122]  Alison L. Bosman,et al.  Seabird guano as a determinant of rocky intertidal community structure , 1986 .

[123]  B. Menge,et al.  Community Regulation: Under What Conditions Are Bottom‐Up Factors Important on Rocky Shores? , 1992 .

[124]  R. Paine,et al.  ADVANCES IN ECOLOGICAL UNDERSTANDING: BY KUHNIAN REVOLUTION OR CONCEPTUAL EVOLUTION? , 2002 .

[125]  Joseph H. Connell,et al.  On the Prevalence and Relative Importance of Interspecific Competition: Evidence from Field Experiments , 1983, The American Naturalist.

[126]  P. Holgate,et al.  Matrix Population Models. , 1990 .

[127]  Bernard Barber,et al.  Resistance by scientists to scientific discovery. , 1961, Science.

[128]  Yoh Iwasa,et al.  Dynamics of a metapopulation with space-limited subpopulations , 1986 .

[129]  D. Dittman,et al.  Diel variation of intertidal foraging by Cancer productus L. in British Columbia , 1989 .

[130]  J. McClintock,et al.  Size Selective Predation by the Asteroid Pisaster ochraceus on the Bivalve Mytilus calif ornianus: A Cost‐Benefit Analysis , 1986 .

[131]  B. Menge Predation intensity in a rocky intertidal community , 2004, Oecologia.

[132]  P. W. Frank The Biodemography of an Intertidal Snail Population , 1965 .

[133]  M. Power,et al.  TOP-DOWN AND BOTTOM-UP FORCES IN FOOD WEBS: DO PLANTS HAVE PRIMACY? , 1992 .

[134]  S. Baker ON THE CAUSES OF THE ZONING OF BROWN SEAWEEDS ON THE SEASHORE , 1909 .

[135]  C. Darwin The Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, Or, The Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life , 1859 .

[136]  K. L. Cottingham National Center for Ecological Analysis and Synthesis, Santa Barbara, California 93101 and Center for Limnology, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin 53706 , 1999 .

[137]  M. Hixon,et al.  Synergistic predation, density dependence, and population regulation in marine fish , 1997 .

[138]  Prey selection and the impact of the starfish Marthasterias glacialis (L.) and other predators on the mussel Choromytilus Meridionalis (Krauss) , 1984 .

[139]  E. Ólafsson,et al.  Does recruitment limitation structure populations and communities of macro-in-vertebrates in marine soft sediments?: the relative significance of pre and post-settlement processes , 1994 .

[140]  R. Paine,et al.  Intertidal community structure , 1974, Oecologia.

[141]  P. Hockey,et al.  A model describing the interactive roles of predation, competition and tidal elevation in structuring mussel populations , 1987 .