The relationship between intelligence and creativity: New support for the threshold hypothesis by means of empirical breakpoint detection

The relationship between intelligence and creativity has been subject to empirical research for decades. Nevertheless, there is yet no consensus on how these constructs are related. One of the most prominent notions concerning the interplay between intelligence and creativity is the threshold hypothesis, which assumes that above-average intelligence represents a necessary condition for high-level creativity. While earlier research mostly supported the threshold hypothesis, it has come under fire in recent investigations. The threshold hypothesis is commonly investigated by splitting a sample at a given threshold (e.g., at 120 IQ points) and estimating separate correlations for lower and upper IQ ranges. However, there is no compelling reason why the threshold should be fixed at an IQ of 120, and to date, no attempts have been made to detect the threshold empirically. Therefore, this study examined the relationship between intelligence and different indicators of creative potential and of creative achievement by means of segmented regression analysis in a sample of 297 participants. Segmented regression allows for the detection of a threshold in continuous data by means of iterative computational algorithms. We found thresholds only for measures of creative potential but not for creative achievement. For the former the thresholds varied as a function of criteria: When investigating a liberal criterion of ideational originality (i.e., two original ideas), a threshold was detected at around 100 IQ points. In contrast, a threshold of 120 IQ points emerged when the criterion was more demanding (i.e., many original ideas). Moreover, an IQ of around 85 IQ points was found to form the threshold for a purely quantitative measure of creative potential (i.e., ideational fluency). These results confirm the threshold hypothesis for qualitative indicators of creative potential and may explain some of the observed discrepancies in previous research. In addition, we obtained evidence that once the intelligence threshold is met, personality factors become more predictive for creativity. On the contrary, no threshold was found for creative achievement, i.e. creative achievement benefits from higher intelligence even at fairly high levels of intellectual ability.

[1]  A Meta-Analysis,et al.  Can Only Intelligent People Be Creative , 2005 .

[2]  Mathias Benedek,et al.  Revisiting Mednick’s Model on Creativity-Related Differences in Associative Hierarchies. Evidence for a Common Path to Uncommon Thought , 2013, The Journal of creative behavior.

[3]  K Ulm,et al.  A statistical method for assessing a threshold in epidemiological studies. , 1991, Statistics in medicine.

[4]  Jordan B. Peterson,et al.  Reliability, Validity, and Factor Structure of the Creative Achievement Questionnaire , 2005 .

[5]  Jonathan A. Plucker,et al.  Is the Proof in the Pudding? Reanalyses of Torrance's (1958 to Present) Longitudinal Data , 1999 .

[6]  R. Sternberg,et al.  The Cambridge handbook of intelligence , 2011 .

[7]  David Lubinski,et al.  Creativity and Occupational Accomplishments Among Intellectually Precocious Youths: An Age 13 to Age 33 Longitudinal Study. , 2005 .

[8]  K. Gilhooly,et al.  Divergent thinking: strategies and executive involvement in generating novel uses for familiar objects. , 2007, British journal of psychology.

[9]  K. McGrew.  CHC theory and the human cognitive abilities project: Standing on the shoulders of the giants of psychometric intelligence research , 2009 .

[10]  A K Wagner,et al.  Segmented regression analysis of interrupted time series studies in medication use research , 2002, Journal of clinical pharmacy and therapeutics.

[11]  Kaoru Yamamoto.  Threshold of Intelligence in Academic Achievement of Highly Creative Students , 1964 .

[12]  H. Akiskal,et al.  Creativity and affective temperaments in non-clinical professional artists: an empirical psychometric investigation. , 2011, Journal of affective disorders.

[13]  J P GUILFORD,et al.  The measurement of individual differences in originality. , 1953, Psychological bulletin.

[14]  Roni Reiter-Palmon,et al.  Assessing creativity with self-report scales: A review and empirical evaluation. , 2012 .

[15]  J. Carroll.  Human Cognitive Abilities-a sur-vey of factor-analytic studies , 1993 .

[16]  Kyung Hee Kim,et al.  Can Only Intelligent People Be Creative? A Meta-Analysis , 2005 .

[17]  Aljoscha C. Neubauer,et al.  BIMODALITY IN THE BERLIN MODEL OF INTELLIGENCE STRUCTURE (BIS): A REPLICATION STUDY , 1996 .

[18]  William B. Michael,et al.  Psychometric Issues in the Assessment of Creativity , 1989 .

[19]  Moritz Heene,et al.  Openness, fluid intelligence, and crystallized intelligence: Toward an integrative model , 2012 .

[20]  Adrian Furnham,et al.  Personality and Intellectual Competence , 2005 .

[21]  D. Lubinski,et al.  Ability Differences Among People Who Have Commensurate Degrees Matter for Scientific Creativity , 2008, Psychological science.

[22]  Szabolcs Kéri,et al.  Solitary minds and social capital: Latent inhibition, general intellectual functions and social network size predict creative achievements. , 2011 .

[23]  J. Kaufman,et al.  Beyond Big and Little: The Four C Model of Creativity , 2009 .

[24]  D. Simonton.  Origins of genius : Darwinian perspectives on creativity , 1999 .

[25]  Mark Batey,et al.  Individual Differences in Ideational Behavior: Can the Big Five and Psychometric Intelligence Predict Creativity Scores? , 2010 .

[26]  J. Guilford,et al.  The nature of human intelligence. , 1968 .

[27]  M. Karwowski,et al.  Threshold hypothesis: Fact or artifact? , 2013 .

[28]  L. Johnson,et al.  Creativity and Intelligence in Preschoolers , 1993 .

[29]  J. W. Getzels,et al.  Creativity and Intelligence , 1962 .

[30]  A. Furnham,et al.  Creativity, Intelligence, and Personality: A Critical Review of the Scattered Literature , 2006, Genetic, social, and general psychology monographs.

[31]  Jordan B. Peterson,et al.  PERSONALITY PROCESSES AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES Decreased Latent Inhibition Is Associated With Increased Creative Achievement in High-Functioning Individuals , 2003 .

[32]  M. Benedek,et al.  Differential effects of cognitive inhibition and intelligence on creativity , 2012, Personality and individual differences.

[33]  John Baer,et al.  Essentials of Creativity Assessment , 2008 .

[34]  J. Nijenhuis,et al.  The Relationship Between Diverse Components of Intelligence and Creativity , 2010 .

[35]  Mark A. Runco,et al.  The threshold theory regarding creativity and intelligence: An empirical test with gifted and nongifted children. , 1986 .

[36]  R. Sternberg,et al.  Creativity and intelligence. , 1998 .

[37]  Emily C. Nusbaum,et al.  Are intelligence and creativity really so different? ☆: Fluid intelligence, executive processes, and strategy use in divergent thinking , 2011 .

[38]  Roger E. Beaty,et al.  Making creative metaphors: The importance of fluid intelligence for creative thought , 2012 .

[39]  Michael A. Wallach,et al.  Modes of thinking in young children: A study of the creativity-intelligence distinction. , 1965 .

[40]  M. Benedek,et al.  The road to creative achievement: A latent variable model of ability and personality predictors , 2014 .

[41]  D. Lubinski,et al.  Contrasting Intellectual Patterns Predict Creativity in the Arts and Sciences , 2007, Psychological science.

[42]  M. Muggeo,et al.  segmented: An R package to Fit Regression Models with Broken-Line Relationships , 2008 .

[43]  C. Lance.  Residual Centering, Exploratory and Confirmatory Moderator Analysis, and Decomposition of Effects in Path Models Containing Interactions , 1988 .

[44]  T. M. Amabile.  Social psychology of creativity: A consensual assessment technique. , 1982 .

[45]  R. Sternberg,et al.  The concept of creativity: Prospects and paradigms. , 1998 .

[46]  Sheri J. Broyles,et al.  Creativity and the Five-Factor Model , 1996 .

[47]  R. Davies.  Hypothesis testing when a nuisance parameter is present only under the alternative , 1977 .

[48]  D. Hocevar,et al.  Ideational fluency as a confounding factor in the measurement of originality. , 1979 .

[49]  J. W. Getzels,et al.  Creativity and Intelligence: Explorations with Gifted Students. , 1962 .

[50]  M. Benedek,et al.  Associative abilities underlying creativity. , 2012 .

[51]  J. Kaufman,et al.  Intelligence and creativity. , 2011 .

[52]  Mathias Benedek,et al.  Assessment of Divergent Thinking by means of the Subjective Top-Scoring Method: Effects of the Number of Top-Ideas and Time-on-Task on Reliability and Validity. , 2013, Psychology of aesthetics, creativity, and the arts.

[53]  F. Preckel,et al.  Relationship of intelligence and creativity in gifted and non-gifted students: An investigation of threshold theory , 2006 .

[54]  Testing for a Breakpoint in Two-Phase Linear and Logistic Regression Models , 1997 .

[55]  Gregory J. Feist.  The Function of Personality in Creativity , 2010, The Cambridge Handbook of Creativity.

[56]  Beverly Roskos-Ewoldsen,et al.  Relation of Creativity to Fluid and Crystallized Intelligence , 2005 .

[57]  Mark A. Runco,et al.  The Cambridge Handbook of Creativity: Divergent Thinking, Creativity, and Ideation , 2010 .

[58]  Gregory J. Feist.  A Meta-Analysis of Personality in Scientific and Artistic Creativity , 1998, Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

[59]  H. Eysenck.  Genius: The Natural History of Creativity , 1995 .

[60]  John T. Willse,et al.  Assessing Creativity With Divergent Thinking Tasks: Exploring the Reliability and Validity of New Subjective Scoring Methods , 2008 .

[61]  F. Barron.  Creative person and creative process , 1969 .

[62]  W. Coward,et al.  Linearity of ability-performance relationships: A reconfirmation. , 1990 .