Quantitative Analysis of Torso FDG-PET Scans by Using Anatomical Standardization of Normal Cases from Thorough Physical Examinations

Understanding of standardized uptake value (SUV) of 2-deoxy-2-[18F]fluoro-d-glucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) depends on the background accumulations of glucose because the SUV often varies the status of patients. The purpose of this study was to develop a new method for quantitative analysis of SUV of FDG-PET scan images. The method included an anatomical standardization and a statistical comparison with normal cases by using Z-score that are often used in SPM or 3D-SSP approach for brain function analysis. Our scheme consisted of two approaches, which included the construction of a normal model and the determination of the SUV scores as Z-score index for measuring the abnormality of an FDG-PET scan image. To construct the normal torso model, all of the normal images were registered into one shape, which indicated the normal range of SUV at all voxels. The image deformation process consisted of a whole body rigid registration of shoulder to bladder region and liver registration and a non-linear registration of body surface by using the thin-plate spline technique. In order to validate usefulness of our method, we segment suspicious regions on FDG-PET images manually, and obtained the Z-scores of the regions based on the corresponding voxels that stores the mean and the standard deviations from the normal model. We collected 243 (143 males and 100 females) normal cases to construct the normal model. We also extracted 432 abnormal spots from 63 abnormal cases (73 cancer lesions) to validate the Z-scores. The Z-scores of 417 out of 432 abnormal spots were higher than 2.0, which statistically indicated the severity of the spots. In conclusions, the Z-scores obtained by our computerized scheme with anatomical standardization of torso region would be useful for visualization and detection of subtle lesions on FDG-PET scan images even when the SUV may not clearly show an abnormality.

[1]  S. Yasuda,et al.  Application of positron emission tomography imaging to cancer screening , 2000, British Journal of Cancer.

[2]  Satoshi Minoshima,et al.  Diagnosis of suspected Alzheimer’s disease is improved by automated analysis of regional cerebral blood flow , 2004, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[3]  J. Keyes SUV: standard uptake or silly useless value? , 1995, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[4]  Xiangrong Zhou,et al.  Model-Based Approach to Recognize the Rectus Abdominis Muscle in CT Images , 2013, IEICE Trans. Inf. Syst..

[5]  D E Kuhl,et al.  Stereotactic PET atlas of the human brain: aid for visual interpretation of functional brain images. , 1994, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[6]  M. Giger,et al.  Digital image subtraction of temporally sequential chest images for detection of interval change. , 1994, Medical physics.

[7]  Naokazu Miyamoto,et al.  Computer-assisted diagnostic system for neurodegenerative dementia using brain SPECT and 3D-SSP , 2009, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[8]  W. Oyen,et al.  SUV: From Silly Useless Value to Smart Uptake Value , 2010, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[9]  Hiroshi Fukuda,et al.  Performance profile of FDG-PET and PET/CT for cancer screening on the basis of a Japanese Nationwide Survey , 2007, Annals of nuclear medicine.

[10]  A. Alavi,et al.  Standardized uptake values of FDG: body surface area correction is preferable to body weight correction. , 1994, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[11]  Lars Edenbrandt,et al.  Quality of planar whole-body bone scan interpretations—a nationwide survey , 2008, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[12]  L. Edenbrandt,et al.  Computer-Assisted Interpretation of Planar Whole-Body Bone Scans , 2008, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[13]  O. Schober,et al.  Is whole-body FDG-PET valuable for health screening? , 2005, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[14]  Fred L. Bookstein,et al.  Principal Warps: Thin-Plate Splines and the Decomposition of Deformations , 1989, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[15]  S. Yasuda,et al.  Cancer screening with whole-body F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron-emission tomography , 1997, The Lancet.

[16]  Kengo Ito,et al.  Analysis of various malignant neoplasms detected by FDG-PET cancer screening program: based on a Japanese Nationwide Survey , 2011, Annals of nuclear medicine.

[17]  Marc Kachelriess,et al.  Procedure guideline for tumor imaging with 18F-FDG PET/CT 1.0. , 2006, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[18]  H. Fujita,et al.  Development and evaluation of statistical shape modeling for principal inner organs on torso CT images , 2014, Radiological Physics and Technology.

[19]  S C Huang,et al.  Anatomy of SUV. Standardized uptake value. , 2000, Nuclear medicine and biology.

[20]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Spatial registration and normalization of images , 1995 .

[21]  Jarrett Rosenberg,et al.  Standardized Uptake Value Atlas: Characterization of Physiological 2-Deoxy-2-[18F]fluoro-d-glucose Uptake in Normal Tissues , 2007, Molecular Imaging and Biology.

[22]  Sung-Cheng Huang,et al.  Anatomy of SUV , 2000 .

[23]  A. Buck,et al.  Whole-body PET: physiological and artifactual fluorodeoxyglucose accumulations. , 1996, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[24]  M. Ide,et al.  Is whole-body FDG-PET valuable for health screening? , 2005, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[25]  R. Koeppe,et al.  A diagnostic approach in Alzheimer's disease using three-dimensional stereotactic surface projections of fluorine-18-FDG PET. , 1995, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[26]  K. Doi,et al.  Development of a computer-aided diagnostic scheme for detection of interval changes in successive whole-body bone scans. , 2006, Medical Physics (Lancaster).