Mechanics of cell spreading within 3D-micropatterned environments.

Most tissue cells evolve in vivo in a three-dimensional (3D) microenvironment including complex topographical patterns. Cells exert contractile forces to adhere and migrate through the extracellular matrix (ECM). Although cell mechanics has been extensively studied on 2D surfaces, there are too few approaches that give access to the traction forces that are exerted in 3D environments. Here, we describe an approach to measure dynamically the contractile forces exerted by fibroblasts while they spread within arrays of large flexible micropillars coated with ECM proteins. Contrary to very dense arrays of microposts, the density of the micropillars has been chosen to promote cell adhesion in between the pillars. Cells progressively impale onto the micropatterned substrate. They first adhere on the top of the pillars without applying any detectable forces. Then, they spread along the pillar sides, spanning between the elastic micropillars and applying large forces on the substrate. Interestingly, the architecture of the actin cytoskeleton and the adhesion complexes vary over time as cells pull on the pillars. In particular, we observed less stress fibers than for cells spread on flat surfaces. However, prominent actin stress fibers are observed at cell edges surrounding the micropillars. They generate increasing contractile forces during cell spreading. Cells treated with blebbistatin, a myosin II inhibitor, relax their internal tension, as observed by the release of pillar deformations. Moreover, cell spreading on pillars coated with ECM proteins only on their tops are not able to generate significant traction forces. Taken together, these findings highlight the dynamic relationship between cellular forces and acto-myosin contractility in 3D environments, the influence of cytoskeletal network mechanics on cell shape, as well as the importance of cell-ECM contact area in the generation of traction forces.

[1]  Ben Fabry,et al.  Single-cell response to stiffness exhibits muscle-like behavior , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[2]  S. Hanks,et al.  Cellular responses to substrate topography: role of myosin II and focal adhesion kinase. , 2006, Biophysical journal.

[3]  B. Geiger,et al.  Assembly and mechanosensory function of focal contacts. , 2001, Current opinion in cell biology.

[4]  P. Chavrier,et al.  Actin dynamics during phagocytosis. , 2001, Seminars in immunology.

[5]  Benjamin Geiger,et al.  Cell spreading and focal adhesion dynamics are regulated by spacing of integrin ligands. , 2007, Biophysical journal.

[6]  Manuel Théry,et al.  The Universal Dynamics of Cell Spreading , 2007, Current Biology.

[7]  A. Curtis,et al.  The influence of microscale topography on fibroblast attachment and motility. , 2004, Biomaterials.

[8]  C. S. Chen,et al.  Geometric control of cell life and death. , 1997, Science.

[9]  P. Janmey,et al.  Effects of substrate stiffness on cell morphology, cytoskeletal structure, and adhesion. , 2005, Cell motility and the cytoskeleton.

[10]  D. Lauffenburger,et al.  Cell Migration: A Physically Integrated Molecular Process , 1996, Cell.

[11]  Peter Friedl,et al.  Mapping proteolytic cancer cell-extracellular matrix interfaces , 2009, Clinical & Experimental Metastasis.

[12]  Manuel Théry,et al.  Cell distribution of stress fibres in response to the geometry of the adhesive environment. , 2006, Cell motility and the cytoskeleton.

[13]  N. Balaban,et al.  Adhesion-dependent cell mechanosensitivity. , 2003, Annual review of cell and developmental biology.

[14]  Simon Schulz,et al.  Early keratinocyte differentiation on micropillar interfaces. , 2007, Nano letters.

[15]  Marion Ghibaudo,et al.  Rigidity-driven growth and migration of epithelial cells on microstructured anisotropic substrates , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[16]  M. Sheetz,et al.  Periodic Lamellipodial Contractions Correlate with Rearward Actin Waves , 2004, Cell.

[17]  Kenneth M. Yamada,et al.  Cell interactions with three-dimensional matrices. , 2002, Current opinion in cell biology.

[18]  Manuel Théry,et al.  Comparative study and improvement of current cell micro-patterning techniques. , 2007, Lab on a chip.

[19]  M. Dembo,et al.  Traction force microscopy of migrating normal and H-ras transformed 3T3 fibroblasts. , 2001, Biophysical journal.

[20]  S. Sen,et al.  Matrix Elasticity Directs Stem Cell Lineage Specification , 2006, Cell.

[21]  Dayong Gao,et al.  Platelet retraction force measurements using flexible post force sensors. , 2010, Lab on a chip.

[22]  Marion Ghibaudo,et al.  Traction forces and rigidity sensing regulate cell functions , 2008 .

[23]  Manuel Théry,et al.  The extracellular matrix guides the orientation of the cell division axis , 2005, Nature Cell Biology.

[24]  R. Austin,et al.  Force mapping in epithelial cell migration. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[25]  M. Sheetz,et al.  Local force and geometry sensing regulate cell functions , 2006, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[26]  Daniel A. Fletcher,et al.  Combined atomic force microscopy and side-view optical imaging for mechanical studies of cells , 2009, Nature Methods.

[27]  Wesley R. Legant,et al.  Microfabricated tissue gauges to measure and manipulate forces from 3D microtissues , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[28]  Christopher S. Chen,et al.  Cells lying on a bed of microneedles: An approach to isolate mechanical force , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[29]  M. Sheetz,et al.  Force generated by actomyosin contraction builds bridges between adhesive contacts , 2010, The EMBO journal.

[30]  N. Kirchgessner,et al.  Toward physiological conditions for cell analyses: forces of heart muscle cells suspended between elastic micropillars. , 2008, Biophysical journal.

[31]  P. Hersen,et al.  Strength dependence of cadherin-mediated adhesions. , 2010, Biophysical journal.

[32]  Kenneth M. Yamada,et al.  One-dimensional topography underlies three-dimensional fibrillar cell migration , 2009, The Journal of cell biology.

[33]  Takehiko Kitamori,et al.  Demonstration of a PDMS-based bio-microactuator using cultured cardiomyocytes to drive polymer micropillars. , 2006, Lab on a chip.

[34]  P. Friedl,et al.  The biology of cell locomotion within three-dimensional extracellular matrix , 2000, Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences CMLS.

[35]  Martin Bastmeyer,et al.  Filamentous network mechanics and active contractility determine cell and tissue shape. , 2008, Biophysical journal.

[36]  P. Hersen,et al.  Substrate topography induces a crossover from 2D to 3D behavior in fibroblast migration. , 2009, Biophysical journal.

[37]  Manuel Théry,et al.  Anisotropy of cell adhesive microenvironment governs cell internal organization and orientation of polarity , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[38]  Benjamin Geiger,et al.  Focal Contacts as Mechanosensors Externally Applied Local Mechanical Force Induces Growth of Focal Contacts by an Mdia1-Dependent and Rock-Independent Mechanism , 2001 .

[39]  Benoit Ladoux,et al.  Cytoskeletal coherence requires myosin-IIA contractility , 2010, Journal of Cell Science.

[40]  M. Sheetz,et al.  Nanometer analysis of cell spreading on matrix-coated surfaces reveals two distinct cell states and STEPs. , 2004, Biophysical journal.

[41]  M. Dembo,et al.  Cell movement is guided by the rigidity of the substrate. , 2000, Biophysical journal.

[42]  Manuel Théry,et al.  Experimental and theoretical study of mitotic spindle orientation , 2007, Nature.

[43]  L. Addadi,et al.  Force and focal adhesion assembly: a close relationship studied using elastic micropatterned substrates , 2001, Nature Cell Biology.

[44]  C. Wilkinson,et al.  Reactions of cells to topography. , 1998, Journal of biomaterials science. Polymer edition.

[45]  P. Janmey,et al.  Tissue Cells Feel and Respond to the Stiffness of Their Substrate , 2005, Science.

[46]  Y. Wang,et al.  Cell locomotion and focal adhesions are regulated by substrate flexibility. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.