Energy harvesting using semi-active nonlinear control

This paper presents the application of semi-active control for power harvesting using an electromechanical energy harvester. Two semi-active control strategies are proposed in the form of a time-periodic damper and a nonlinear cubic damper. For the periodic time-varying damper the average harvested power and the throw are obtained based on the Fourier series. The semi-active periodic time-varying damper is optimised to maximise the harvested power. The performance of the optimum semi-active periodic damper is compared with the optimum passive and semi-active on-off model at a particular frequency. It is demonstrated that the periodic time-varying damper can significantly increase the harvested power at all frequencies of interest. For the nonlinear damper, the harvested power and the throw are derived using the concept of the describing function. The results are compared with the linear damper. It is demonstrated that the nonlinear damper can significantly increase the absorbed power despite having much lower displacement compared to the linear damper. This makes the semi-active nonlinear damper very attractive for mechanical energy harvesters.

[1]  Shirley J. Dyke,et al.  An experimental study of MR dampers for seismic protection , 1998 .

[2]  Michael J. Brennan,et al.  A comparison of semi-active damping control strategies for vibration isolation of harmonic disturbances , 2005 .

[3]  Yi-Qing Ni,et al.  Cable Vibration Control using Magnetorheological Dampers , 2006 .

[4]  Lei Zuo,et al.  Towards Meso and Macro Scale Energy Harvesting of Vibration , 2009 .

[5]  Jeong Hoon Kim,et al.  Semi-active Damping Control of Suspension Systems for Specified Operational Response Mode: Application to the Quater Car Model , 2002 .

[6]  David J. Wagg,et al.  Generalisation and optimisation of semi-active, on-off switching controllers for single degree-of-freedom systems , 2010 .

[7]  G Chen,et al.  MR damper and its application for semi-active control of vehicle suspension system , 2002 .

[8]  Maurizio Repetto,et al.  Energy harvester for vehicle tires: Nonlinear dynamics and experimental outcomes , 2012 .

[9]  Xingjian Jing,et al.  Theoretical study of the effects of nonlinear viscous damping on vibration isolation of sdof systems , 2009 .

[10]  A. Preumont Vibration Control of Active Structures , 1997 .

[11]  Lei Zuo,et al.  Enhanced vibration energy harvesting using dual-mass systems , 2011 .

[12]  Seung-bok Choi,et al.  Vibration Control of a MR Seat Damper for Commercial Vehicles , 2000 .

[13]  Joseph A. Paradiso,et al.  Energy scavenging for mobile and wireless electronics , 2005, IEEE Pervasive Computing.

[14]  Zi Jing Wong,et al.  A MULTI-DEGREE-OF-FREEDOM ELECTROSTATIC MEMS POWER HARVESTER , 2009 .

[15]  Zi-Qiang Lang,et al.  Application of non-linear damping to vibration isolation: an experimental study , 2012 .

[16]  N. G. Stephen,et al.  On energy harvesting from ambient vibration , 2006 .

[17]  Byeng D. Youn,et al.  Robust segment-type energy harvester and its application to a wireless sensor , 2009 .

[18]  I. Kovacic,et al.  Potential benefits of a non-linear stiffness in an energy harvesting device , 2010 .