International production sharing: A case for a coherent policy framework

This study seeks to clarify what vertical specialization/fragmented production/production sharing is, how widespread it is, how it is organized, its driving forces, and what the policy implications are. It presents six country case studies ( USA, Japan, Germany, Brazil, China and South Africa ) where the importance and nature of production sharing or vertical specialization in the automotive and electronics sectors are studied for each country. The automotive industry has always been a leading industry in terms of organizational innovations and recent developments in the sector raise interesting questions about the limits of vertical fragmentation. Electronics is the sector with the highest extent of vertical specialization among all industries. It is characterized by a high value to weight ratio and production of parts and components can easily be separated in time and space. The driving forces discussed are: technology that allows separation of activities in the supply chain in time and space; organizational innovations that take advantage of such new technologies; the role of services - notably the increasing service content of goods following expanding product diversity and customization to consumer demand - but also the rising demand for sophisticated logistics. It is indeed argued that services links make or break a supply chain. The paper argues that the proliferation of international production sharing requires a coherent policy response, particularly in developing countries, since a chain is as strong as its weakest link. It discusses the complementarities between trade liberalization in goods and services, investment policy, protection of intellectual property and competition policy, where it suggests that there may be a case for looking at the impact of lead firms´ buying power.

[1]  H. Vos Trade and Industry , 1946 .

[2]  Avinash Dixit,et al.  International Trade Policy for Oligopolistic Industries , 1984 .

[3]  Paul R. Milgrom,et al.  The Economics of Modern Manufacturing: Technology, Strategy, and Organization , 1990 .

[4]  Gordon H. Hanson,et al.  Foreign Direct Investment and Relative Wages: Evidence from Mexico&Apos;S Maquiladoras , 1995 .

[5]  Edward L. Glaeser,et al.  Information Technology and the Future of Cities , 1996 .

[6]  K. Maskus The Role of Intellectual Property Rights in Encouraging Foreign Direct Investment and Technology Transfer , 1998 .

[7]  Kala Krishna,et al.  Firm Behaviour and Market Access in a Free Trade Area with Rules of Origin , 2005 .

[8]  G. Gereffi International trade and industrial upgrading in the apparel commodity chain , 1999 .

[9]  Dave Alford,et al.  Mass customisation } an automotive perspective , 2000 .

[10]  Rene Belderbos,et al.  The Location of Japanese Investments in China: Agglomeration Effects, Keiretsu, and Firm Heterogeneity , 2002 .

[11]  Kei-Mu Yi,et al.  Can Vertical Specialization Explain the Growth of World Trade? , 2000, Journal of Political Economy.

[12]  J. McLaren,et al.  "Globalization" and Vertical Structure , 2000 .

[13]  Edward E. Leamer,et al.  The Economic Geography of the Internet Age , 2001 .

[14]  René Belderbos,et al.  Backward Vertical Linkages of Foreign Manufacturing Affiliates: Evidence from Japanese Multinationals , 2001 .

[15]  M. Ismail Foreign Direct Investments and Development: The Malaysian Electronics Sector , 2001 .

[16]  A. Venables,et al.  Infrastructure, Geographical Disadvantage, Transport Costs, and Trade , 2001 .

[17]  L. F. Ng,et al.  Regional division of labor from agglomeration economies’ perspective: some evidence , 2001 .

[18]  Giovani J.C. da Silveira,et al.  Mass customization: Literature review and research directions , 2001 .

[19]  Caroline Freund,et al.  The Internet and International Trade in Services , 2002 .

[20]  B. Hoekman,et al.  Economic Development, Competition Policy, and the World Trade Organization , 2002 .

[21]  E. Thompson Clustering of Foreign Direct Investment and Enhanced Technology Transfer: Evidence from Hong Kong Garment Firms in China , 2002 .

[22]  Gordon H. Hanson,et al.  The Value of Information in International Trade: Gains to Outsourcing through Hong Kong , 2002 .

[23]  Aart Kraay,et al.  Governance Matters Ii: Updated Indicators for 2000-01 , 2002 .

[24]  J. Jiao,et al.  Towards high value-added products and services: mass customization and beyond , 2003 .

[25]  J. Humphrey,et al.  The Global Automotive Industry Value Chain: What Prospects for Upgrading by Developing Countries , 2003 .

[26]  Pol Antras,et al.  Firms, Contracts, and Trade Structure , 2003 .

[27]  Diana Farrell Beyond offshoring: assess your company's global potential. , 2004, Harvard business review.

[28]  Growing Division of Labour Dampening Value Added Growth in Manufacturing Industry , 2004 .

[29]  Wei Li,et al.  The Impact of Privatization and Competition in the Telecommunications Sector around the World* , 2004, The Journal of Law and Economics.

[30]  K. Fukao,et al.  Physical and Human Capital Deepening and New Trade Patterns in Japan , 2004 .

[31]  Sanjaya Lall,et al.  China's Competitive Performance: A Threat To East Asian Manufactured Exports? , 2004 .

[32]  A. Simonazzi,et al.  Patterns of industrialization and the flying geese model: the case of electronics in East Asia , 2005 .

[33]  Ricardo D. Paredes,et al.  Lessons from the deregulation transition in Chile's local telephony market , 2005 .

[34]  C. Mann,et al.  Assessing the Benefits of Trade Facilitation: A Global Perspective , 2005 .

[35]  Kei-Mu Yi,et al.  Vertical specialization and three facts about U.S. international trade , 2005 .

[36]  R. Adlung,et al.  Turning Hills into Mountains? Current Commitments Under the Gats and Prospects for Change , 2005 .

[37]  Michael Engman The Economic Impact of Trade Facilitation , 2005 .